Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

баранки и любовь

@barannushka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

427subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001608110828
TypeChannel
Username@barannushka
Created13 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/barannushka

Growth

4278 Aug 2026, 09:00 — 427 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:55 — 427 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:008 Aug 2026, 19:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 426–428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:55427no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:00427first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
97.1%
avg views ÷ 427 subscribers
Avg views / post
415
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held11 (25 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,074
Reactions total254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

613 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529853425064611414621735.4%
custom 534620274833965332715224.8%
custom 534847287048382644910016.3%
custom 5300900738971503226497.99%
custom 5298612702518742264487.83%
custom 5300781510679366349477.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 613reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC247 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

date idea: 30 июля поехать в могилёв на могилу некого рэпера

custom 530090073897150322633custom 52985342506461141467custom 53462027483396533275custom 53007815106793663491custom 53484728704838264491

22 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC518 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💫🔩 #ваняцест

custom 534847287048382644934custom 529853425064611414617custom 53462027483396533276custom 52986127025187422641custom 53007815106793663491

21 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC667 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

с др, братан 👼👼 как говорится, всех кайфов! и возвращайся к жизни 🥺 #ванясветло

custom 529853425064611414633custom 534620274833965332711custom 53009007389715032268custom 53007815106793663491custom 53484728704838264491

21 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC333 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

доброе утро, страна, с праздником

custom 529853425064611414616custom 53009007389715032265custom 53462027483396533273custom 53484728704838264491

20 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC309 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ноль дней без депрессии из-за группы трансмиссия, а мне похуй, я люблю их всем своим сердцем 🌟 а ещё кое во что верю

custom 534620274833965332742custom 534847287048382644917custom 52985342506461141469custom 53007815106793663491

27 Jun 2026, 18:31 UTC541 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

моя жена + вино от рудбоя + вкусные роллы 🍱❤️

custom 534620274833965332739custom 529853425064611414617custom 53484728704838264497custom 53009007389715032263custom 53007815106793663492

25 Jun 2026, 17:24 UTC781 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💋 #ваняцест

custom 529861270251874226435custom 529853425064611414611custom 534847287048382644911custom 53007815106793663491custom 53462027483396533271

18 Jun 2026, 12:42 UTC837 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

glow up о котором никто не подозревал 😳 (но я любила его любым ☕️) #ванярудбой

custom 534620274833965332727custom 529853425064611414615custom 534847287048382644910custom 53007815106793663493

14 Jun 2026, 14:03 UTC723 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

причина неконтролируемой улыбки на сегодня: нойз ака фанатка рудбоя 😁

custom 529853425064611414651custom 530078151067936634911custom 53462027483396533279custom 53484728704838264492

30 May 2026, 13:23 UTC963 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

я сошла с ума 🤯 #ваняцест

custom 529853425064611414640custom 529861270251874226412custom 53484728704838264498custom 53007815106793663492custom 53462027483396533271

25 May 2026, 20:04 UTC694 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

это был мой самый классный др, я в восторге, очень люблю эту точку в которую привела меня жизнь и людей рядом спасибо моей даше, вете и вокально-инструментальному ансамблю дух старого джавиаша а ещё ваняцестам благодаря которым все эти люди появились в моей жизни 😐 джубов сказал мне «анечка, сияй» и кто я такая чтобы хотя бы не попытаться

custom 530078151067936634924custom 53462027483396533278custom 53484728704838264498custom 52985342506461141461

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @barannushka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,717 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“баранки и любовь” (@barannushka), 427 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barannushka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.