Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Девчачья барахляндия

Channel

Девчачья барахляндия

@barahlyandiya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

49,393subscribers

+5,184 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001333458266
TypeChannel
Username@barahlyandiya
Created27 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/barahlyandiya

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

43,34049,85646,59849,3936 August 20267 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net +5,184. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,363–50,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 08:3849,393-463
6 Nov 2026, 07:1949,856+3,585
5 Nov 2026, 07:1646,271+853
4 Nov 2026, 09:3145,418+1,278
3 Nov 2026, 11:4844,140+127
2 Nov 2026, 12:5544,013+183
1 Nov 2026, 13:2643,830+107
31 Oct 2026, 15:0643,723+117
30 Oct 2026, 16:1943,606+107
29 Oct 2026, 19:0043,499+79
28 Oct 2026, 18:2743,420-7
27 Oct 2026, 21:4643,427-12
26 Oct 2026, 19:1043,439-9
25 Oct 2026, 19:1743,448+31
24 Oct 2026, 22:0843,417+41
23 Oct 2026, 21:0043,376+32
22 Oct 2026, 20:5743,344-18
21 Oct 2026, 17:4043,362-5
20 Oct 2026, 13:3043,367+2
19 Oct 2026, 14:4743,365first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.96%
avg views ÷ 49,393 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,450
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
74
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held109 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total181,423
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Advertising

Ad load
41.3%
45 of 109 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
45
posts carrying an erid · 25 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,440
over 45 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,340
over 64 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
F7NfYUJRWmqqH7eNuaVh211 August 20265 November 2026
2SDnjboNrfe16 November 20266 November 2026
2SDnjcEzGnf114 October 202614 October 2026
2SDnjcGKCDh115 October 202615 October 2026
2SDnjcLtjr4127 October 202627 October 2026
2SDnjcPRaG3129 August 202629 August 2026
2SDnjcSQC7W14 November 20264 November 2026
2SDnjcikQHA12 November 20262 November 2026
2SDnjcu5Pvs15 October 20265 October 2026
2SDnjcvUDqN125 October 202625 October 2026
2SDnjd2yTh5119 August 202619 August 2026
2SDnjd5cH3a13 November 20263 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 13 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 74 posts held from the last 30 days (10.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC403 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Две мои экстрашикарные находки: — портсигар, буду носить в нём миниатюрки парфюма, проводные наушники и другую мелочь. — брюки tiger, тут без лишних слов.

6 Nov 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Со временем напитки в пятницу вечером приобретают совсем иной характер… Подсела вот на горячий шоколад с магнием Re-Feel и вам советую, вкусный.

6 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

На тренировках всегда получаю миллион комплиментов и вопросов «откуда?», когда я в Almond Crew. Это правда идеальная спокойная база и quiet luxury в мире спортивной одежды. Никакого чрезмерного пуш-апа и резинок в неудобных местах, а припылённые оттенки розового, голубого и сливового просто идеально миксуются между собой. (Некоторые позиции выгоднее брать на Lamoda).

6 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈3,400 viewsread 7 November 2026

Розыгрыш ECRU × DORA WITH LOVE завершился! Победитель: 1. TG: Ник Морган

6 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC≈2,150 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вау-дроп! Любимые Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 Paraty теперь с меховой отделкой и складным задником, превращающим кроссовки в подобие мюлей. Срочно хочу этих пушистиков в розовом цвете! Нашла их по самой приятной цене на Poizon, но размеры улетают быстро.

6 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 6 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjboNrfePhoto

Уже показывала вам, где купить ювелирный пирсинг (пост здесь), а сегодня у нас варианты доступнее. Roxi — здесь классические пусеты, сияющие колечки, подвески с каплями и цепочками и еще много красивого в пределах 10$. Всё из серебра 925 пробы.

5 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 6 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnje9s6DrPhoto

Продолжаем утепляться по мотивам Paloma Wool: нашла нам похожие гетры на пуговицах и розовый воротничок.

5 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Тем временем в TikTok вирусится тренд на gem nails — маникюр с крупными разноцветными камнями. Давняя любовь азиатских нейл-мастеров теперь добралась и до наших лент. Судя по этим видео, останавливаться на одном камушке никто не собирается. Сама пока просто разглядываю, но уже с подозрительным интересом.

5 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Находки находками, а за идеями, как всё это носить, заглядываю к Свете. Очень люблю её стилизации: • База на холода от бренда Voishe • Осенние покупки на 10 из 10 • Обзор новинок Befree • Удобная обувь на осень и зиму А еще Света прекрасная мама и часто оставляет детские бренды 🤍

5 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 6 November 2026
Advertisementerid F7NfYUJRWmqqH7eNuaVhPhoto

А вот мои роскошные находки в том же настроении. Шерсть, кашемир, мохер — всё нежное, тонкое и чуть просвечивающее. Ame, Aliexpress, Crarmstore, Love Republic, Ugly sweater club.

5 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Inspiration: нежный трикотаж в сливочных и пудровых оттенках. Тонкие кардиганы, вязаные шортики и длинные рукава, чтобы прятать ладони. Хочется всё это носить прямо на голое тело.

4 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Маленькая красивость в сумочку. Органайзер с натуральным тигровым глазом из коллекции Zarina Iconic.

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @barahlyandiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@barahlyandiya edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 November 2026
Most recent edit
2 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @barahlyandiya as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Девчачья барахляндия” (@barahlyandiya), 49,393 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barahlyandiya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.