Channel
@banikandishan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
937subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001006682927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @banikandishan |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/banikandishan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 937 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 931 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 932 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 934 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 934 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
177 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 83.6% | |
| 🙏 | 19 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از این ۳ روز چقدر تونستی برای خودت وقت بذاری؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📝 تمرین روز سوم | فاصله گرفتن از فکرها یکی از فکرهایی که جلسهی دوم نوشتی رو انتخاب کن. مثلاً: «نکنه دیگه دوستم نداشته باشه.» حالا فقط این ۳ کار رو انجام بده: ۱. فکر رو از خودت جدا کن به جای اینکه بگی: «دیگه دوستم نداره» بگو: «الان ذهنم داره این فکر رو میسازه که شاید دیگه دوستم نداشته باشه.» ۲. یک قدم فاصله بگیر از خودت بپرس: «این چیزی که ذهنم میگه، یه واقعیت قطعه یا فقط یه فکریه که ذهنم ساخته؟» ۳. برگرد …
👍5❤1
📚روز سوم | ذهن یه کارخونه فکرسازیه اگه تمرین جلسهی قبل رو انجام داده باشی، احتمالاً متوجه شدی که این همه فکر کردن، اون امنیتی و اطمینانی که ذهنت دنبالش بود رو بهت نداده. احتمالا با خودت فکر میکنی مشکل اینه که ذهنت زیاد از حد فکر میکنه. اما ذهن دقیقاً برای همین کار ساخته شده! یعنی از وقتی بیدار میشی تا وقتی میخوابی، ذهنت لحظهای از فکر ساختن دست برنمیداره. همهی افکار ما، چه مثبت چه منفی محصول طبیعی ذهنن. …
❤4
اگر دوست داشتید، تمرینهاتون رو با ما به اشتراک بذارید. تجربه شما شاید چراغ راه کسی باشه که همین مسیر رو داره طی میکنه ♥️
❤4
📝 تمرین روز دوم | کشف نگرانی پنهان امروز هر بار متوجه شدی دوباره وارد نشخوار فکری شدی، این سه سؤال رو جواب بده: ۱. اگر الان به این موضوع فکر نکنم، میترسم چه اتفاقی بیفته؟ مثلاً: نکنه اشتباه کنم. نکنه از دستش بدم. نکنه اتفاق بدی بیفته. ۲. ذهنم با ادامه دادن این فکر، داره سعی میکنه از من در برابرِ چی محافظت کنه؟ مثلاً: اشتباه کردن قضاوت شدن از دست دادن یک رابطه اتفاق بد ۳. آخرش از خودت بپرس: «این همه فکر کرد…
❤7
روز دوم | پشت نشخوار فکری چی پنهانه؟ جلسه اول یاد گرفتی نشخوار فکری رو تشخیص بدی. امروز قراره یک چیز مهمتر رو بفهمی: اگر نشخوار اینقدر خستهکنندهست، چرا ذهنت دوباره سراغش میره؟ چون ذهن، نشخوار فکری رو یک راهحل میبینه، نه یک مشکل. ذهنت فکر میکنه اگر بیشتر فکر کنه، میتونه ازت محافظت کنه؛ مثلاً نذاره دوباره اشتباه کنی، نذاره اتفاق بدی بیفته یا کمک کنه جواب سؤالت رو پیدا کنی. به همین خاطر، هر بار دوباره تو ر…
❤6
📝 تمرین روز اول | شکارچی نشخوار شو امروز قرار نیست جلوی نشخوار رو بگیری یا افکارت رو عوض کنی. هر بار که متوجه شدی ذهنت روی یک موضوع گیر کرده، چند ثانیه مکث کن و این ۳ سؤال رو از خودت بپرس: ۱. محرک چی بود؟ قبل از اینکه این فکرها شروع بشن، چه اتفاقی افتاد؟ یه پیام دیدم؟ یه خاطره یادم اومد؟ استرس گرفتم؟ حالم بد شد؟ ۲. ذهنم دور چه فکری داره میچرخه؟ فقط موضوع رو توی یک جمله بنویس. مثلاً: «چرا اون حرف رو زدم؟» ی…
❤13👍3
این چرخه معمولاً اینطوری شروع میشه: 🔹 یه اتفاق استرسزا یا یه احساس ناخوشایند پیش میاد. 🔹 کمکم توجهت روی چند تا فکر خاص قفل میکنه و ذهنت فقط همونا رو مرور میکنه. 🔹 بعد شروع میکنی به تحلیل کردن: «چرا این اتفاق افتاد؟» «مقصر کی بود؟» «اگه اون موقع یه کار دیگه میکردم چی میشد؟» ممکنه حس کنی داری مسئله رو حل میکنی، اما در واقع ذهنت توی همون چرخه گیر افتاده. 🔹 هرچی بیشتر این فکرها تکرار میشن، حالت بدتر میشه. …
❤12
روز اول | نشخوار فکری رو بشناس ❌️ اول از همه یه باور اشتباه رو کنار بذاریم. خیلی وقتها فکر میکنیم: «اگه بیشتر بهش فکر کنم، بالاخره یه راهحل پیدا میکنم.» اما تحقیقات نشون میدن چیزی که بهش میگیم نشخوار فکری، معمولاً حل مسئله نیست؛ بلکه گیر افتادن توی یک چرخه از افکار تکراریه. نشخوار فکری یعنی ذهنت مدام دور یک موضوع میچرخه؛ معمولاً اتفاقهای گذشته، احساسات منفی، اشتباهها یا پیامدهای اونها. @banikandishan
❤8
حالا اگر آمادهای، روز اول رو پرقدرت شروع کنیم این پست رو ♥️ کن یا کامنت بذار: «من آمادهام.»
❤31
قبل از اینکه شروع کنیم، یه معرفی کوتاه از این دوره داشته باشیم 👇 📌قراره طی ۷ روز، قدمبهقدم با نشخوار فکری آشنا بشیم، چرخه شکلگیری اون رو بشناسیم و مهارتهایی رو یاد بگیریم که کمکمون کنه کنترل بیشتری روی ذهنمون داشته باشیم. 🗓 از امروز، به مدت ۷ روز، هر روز با یک آموزش کوتاه + یک تمرین کاربردی همراه شما هستیم. @banikandishan
❤8
درود به همراهان همیشگی نیکاندیشان 👋 خیلی خوشحالیم که تصمیم گرفتید در این دوره آموزشی رایگان همراه ما باشید. همچنین به دوستانی که بهتازگی به جمع همراهان مسیر رهایی از نشخوار فکری پیوستن، صمیمانه خوشآمد میگیم.♥️ @banikandishan
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @banikandishan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
از این ۳ روز چقدر تونستی برای خودت وقت بذاری؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آمادهای توی این مسیر ۷ روزه همراهمون باشی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️تا حالا نشخوار فکری رو تجربه کردی؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیک اندیشان” (@banikandishan), 937 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/banikandishan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.