Posted without readable text
Signed Dekins

Channel
@bananday
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
297subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003665984492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bananday |
| Description | Новости про telegram / подарки / прочее ——————————————————————— Ссылка для друга: https://t.me/+tubnTxFwWcM4MzIy ——————————————————————— По всем вопросам пишите @dekins_bro |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bananday |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 297 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 297 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 582 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474202342947560999 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5188636268153546744 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5336867894619810730 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5350733419145894947 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5404547177521373112 | 1 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
Signed Dekins
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Dekins
Оказывается fragment просто поменял местами доллары и gram, а ничего не убирал
Signed Dekins
Не вместо, просто местами поменяли, раньше сначало gram был потом usdt, теперь наоборот. Если уменьшить шрифт то видно будет 😅
Signed Dekins
Telelakel рассказал о будущем обновлении telegram. Перевод: 🤖 Вот что появится в следующем стабильном обновлении Telegram (v12.10.0): — Встроенный кошелек TON (Gram) в Telegram. Встроенный кошелек будет представлять собой отдельный раздел в приложении. По моим наблюдениям, он разработан с нуля, а не использует существующий сторонний кошелек, хотя окончательная реализация еще не завершена. [Подробнее] — Поддержка к…
Signed Dekins
Колобка смотрели? Говорят лучше чем челопуки всякие
Signed Dekins
Fragment теперь показывает доллары вместо gram (ton) при выборе количества звёзд для покупки. То есть вы не сможете понять хватит вам gram или нет пока не нажмёте кнопку купить, только тогда fragment покажет количество gram для покупки Все фигня, он просто поменял доллары и gram местами, а у меня почему-то gram не отобразились
Signed Dekins
Posted without readable text
Signed Dekins
МАГИЯ УЛУЧШЕНИЙ В ТЕЛЕГРАМЕ 🪄 ➡️ В прошлом году популярный дата-майнер наткнулся на интересную закономерность, при которой один и тот же аккаунт в Telegram забирает подарки #XXXXX и т.п. После расследования оказалось, что аккаунт довольно схож с одним аккаунтом разработчиков Telegram (а в прошлом и VK). Аккаунт с такой же фамилией, городом и разницей в ~5 лет. Возможно, это ЖЕНА разработчика. Сегодня, во время улу…
Signed Dekins
⚡️ Карточка готовности улучшений Мы собрали свежую карточку с предполагаемой готовностью улучшений для подарков. Она основана на последних сливах, намёках и слухах от сообщества. upd: Карточка будет обновлятся один раз в 8-9 дней.
custom 53368678946198107302custom 53507334191458949472custom 54742023429475609992
Signed Dekins
Мы продолжаем задавать вопросы дизайнерам Telegram-подарков и следующий вопрос такой: 😎 — Есть ли отсылка, которую хотелось бы реализовать, но пока не было возможности? 😎 Paul ✏️_Creates — В этом скине 🎁 очень хотелось сделать белку из Ice Age но увы.. 🤗 OLGAGLOW — Не думала над этим вопросом и так с ходу не могу ответить Пока что удавалась реализовать все желаемые отсылки 😇 KOGOS.tgs — Колибри, видимо)) 🤩 Potot…
Signed Dekins
Обновление про эффекты на сообщениях (в мае 2024) взяли в качестве иллюстрации португальских гусей когда над ними пролетел метеор и это попало в кадр
Signed Dekins
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bananday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Banana News” (@bananday), 297 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bananday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.