Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🐞brio$h🍌

Channel

🐞brio$h🍌

@bananaBugpoop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003329870321
TypeChannel
Username@bananaBugpoop
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bananaBugpoop

Growth

109112110.58 August 2026 — 110 subscribers8 August 2026 — 109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109 subscribers1 September 2026 — 112 subscribers8 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:25112+3
9 Aug 2026, 07:46109no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:58109-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:32110first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52153590177983563442324.5%
💅1617.0%
custom 54341383983842004341414.9%
🌚1010.6%
custom 531914018517735491699.57%
custom 533687639865508844699.57%
😘77.45%
custom 500130139540868381244.26%
❤‍🔥22.13%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC31 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bigwhitedog1074Photo

сегодня у меня день рождения и мне исполнилось 1(один)7(семь) лет. Репостните мои картинки пожалуйста 😎

💅3custom 53368763986550884461custom 54341383983842004341

4 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026

ВСЕМ ПОЗДРАВЛЯТЬ И ОБОЖАТЬ ЭТОГО ДЖЕНТЕЛЬБЛЕНА🤩🤩🤩🤩💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘🤤🤤🤤🤤👍👍👍👍

29 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTC88 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Приятного аппетита сосунки... (ФЕМ СПАЙ ЕС ЧО)))

💅13custom 53191401851773549167custom 52153590177983563446❤‍🔥1custom 54341383983842004341

28 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC85 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Слыхали о сэндвиче со

🌚10custom 53368763986550884462custom 53191401851773549161

22 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC130 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ой и ещо будет вторая часть реквестов ес чо💘

custom 543413839838420043410

22 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC123 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лучше поздно чем никогда...💘

custom 521535901779835634417😘7custom 53368763986550884466custom 50013013954086838124custom 54341383983842004342❤‍🔥1custom 53191401851773549161

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @bananaBugpoop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐞brio$h🍌” (@bananaBugpoop), 112 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bananaBugpoop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.