Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Екатерина Балтер | Бизнес-психолог

@balter_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001730054587
TypeChannel
Username@balter_psy
DescriptionБизнес-психолог для лидеров в кризисе и неопределенности Как выдерживать кризисы и найти силы действовать дальше EdTech-инвестор, альпинистка, женщина-марафонец и мама троих детей Консультация со мной @ekaterina_balter
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/balter_psy

Growth

2237 Aug 2026, 16:20 — 223 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:31 — 223 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:208 Aug 2026, 10:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:31223no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:20223first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total641
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
198
Videos
56
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7040.9%
🔥5230.4%
👍3319.3%
🎉137.60%
😍31.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC48 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь проходит так, как ты ее проводишь *только на фото увидела, что радуги было две

8😍3👍1

30 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC60 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы часто сожалеем о том, какой выбор делаем и какую жизнь не успели прожить... Австралийская паллиативная медсестра Бронни Вэр в своей книге «Пять откровений о жизни» описала пять главных сожалений умирающих людей: "Мне бы хотелось иметь смелость жить так, как хотел я сам, а не так, как ожидали другие" ... "Я бы хотел не работать так много" ... "Я бы хотел иметь смелость выражать свои чувства" ... "Я бы хотел остав

6👍6🔥5

20 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC88 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Внутренние метания съедают много энергии. И в итоге не остается ни желания, ни сил действовать: - посты не написаны - продукт так и не запущен - тренировку снова отложили - на отпуск деньги не накоплены - новая жизнь с понедельника так и не началась. Чтобы перестать сливать энергию на эти метания, нужно сначала понять их причину. А в следующем посте дам действия. Внутренние метания - это непринятие решения, когда е

👍4🔥41

19 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Эта песня случайно попала в мой плей-лист несколько месяцев назад. Я могу только догадываться, что примерно так ощущается кризис смыслов у мужчин (кризис 30 лет, экзистенциальный или кризис среднего возраста). И девять утра, ты давно на ногах Мегаполис отражается в потухших глазах Ты один из миллионов, ты так сильно устал И всю радость из жизни этот город забрал Женщинам тоже будет полезно послушать и задуматься

🔥32

19 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fmusbotFile

🔍 Найти любимую песню!

17 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC74 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6

17 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC71 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍5

17 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мужчины в России стали страдать от кризиса среднего возраста уже в 28–30 лет. Теперь экзистенциальное переосмысление наступает на 10 лет раньше. Сдвиг произошёл из-за культа успеха, достигаторства и перфекционизма, отмечают психологи. Из-за этого число обращений мужчин за психологической помощью за последние 5 лет взлетело в 4 раза. @bankrollo

5

16 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC81 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

инсайты не меняют жизнь! Пока ты не начнешь делать, ничего не поменяется. Можно ходить по астрологам, тарологам, психологам, читать книги, восхищаться от своих осознаний и ничего не менять при этом. Разве мы не знаем про правильное питание, и что заедать стресс фастфудом приведет к лишнему весу? Но сколько из нас реально питается по методу гарвардской тарелки? И так в любой сфере. Наш результат тормозит бездействи

🔥74👍3

11 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC91 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Обещала — выполняю. Разбор Кристины: почему «начинаю вести блог и снова бросаю». В такой ситуации многие считают, что это лень и отсутствие дисциплины. Но суть намного глубже и дисциплина тут не поможет. В подкасте разобрала четыре причины этого конфликта «хочу, начинаю, но бросаю». У Кристины была самая незаметная из них. Послушайте — возможно, узнаете себя. Ставьте 🔥, так я пойму, что идем в эту тему дальше.

🔥72👍2

25 Jun 2026, 19:13 UTC143 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Решила завести рубрику РАЗБОРЫ СИТУАЦИЙ. Как бы вы поступили на месте Кристины? Кристина пришла ко мне с запросом: «Хочу разобраться, почему я не могу вести соцсети регулярно. Начинаю и снова бросаю. И каждый раз виню себя за то, что обещала себе делать контент, но снова пропала.» Она хочет вести соцсети, чтобы приходили клиенты. У кого такая же проблема? Как думаете, почему так получается? Пишите свои варианты

🔥53👍3

23 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC122 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну, что… Сегодня важный день. Я стала магистром психологии 😎👩‍🎓🥳 Защитила свою магистерскую работу на «отлично». 2 года очного обучения в Московском Институте Психоанализа подошли к концу. Это был очень серьезный и ценный опыт - в личностном и профессиональном плане. Спасибо всем, кто был рядом со мной ❤️❤️❤️ - семью (особенно мужа, который терпел мои перфекционистские загоны), друзей и близких, одногруппников, по

15👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @balter_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

ПЕРЕХОД К СЕБЕ

  1. Больше не оправдываться за свои желания и выборы33%
  2. Говорить «нет» тому, что разрушает или истощает67%
  3. Выбирать свои интересы без чувства вины и стыда67%
  4. Свой вариант (напишу в комментарии)0%

The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Екатерина Балтер | Бизнес-психолог” (@balter_psy), 223 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/balter_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.