⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌟 𝖼𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗇 ✅ welcome to my new channel! — 💙. ‘ Manners Maketh Man is a new daily magazine with all news, spots and releases about Chris Baizen. for more informations, use all links in the fixed post! ㅤ⠀ ➿➿ ˓ 💙 ˒ ➿➿ ㅤ
❤🔥1

Channel
@baizenupdates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001331547987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baizenupdates |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baizenupdates |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 108 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 108 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 19 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5172503902838326751 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5172508309474773222 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5172776981153973968 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5172907174497617924 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5172409559586702631 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌟 𝖼𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗇 ✅ welcome to my new channel! — 💙. ‘ Manners Maketh Man is a new daily magazine with all news, spots and releases about Chris Baizen. for more informations, use all links in the fixed post! ㅤ⠀ ➿➿ ˓ 💙 ˒ ➿➿ ㅤ
❤🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hello, Chrislovers! Passando aqui pra deixar um recado importante: como alguns de vocês já sabem o Chris infelizmente perdeu o acesso à conta antiga e não é mais o dono deste canal. Ele já está criando um novo canal e em breve vai estar de volta por lá compartilhando todas as novidades com vocês. Por enquanto deixem nos comentários o @ de vocês e também o @ dos canais! Assim que tudo estiver pronto, ele vai passar…
💘3⚡2❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝖠𝖭𝖨𝖳𝖳𝖠 𝗪𝗶𝗧𝗵 𝖩𝖠̃𝖮 𝖱𝖮𝖬𝖠𝖭𝖨𝖠 𝗣𝗜𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗔 ✶ 𝟤𝟫.𝖮𝟣 𝖺𝗌 𝟤𝟣𝖧
custom 51725039028383267513custom 51727769811539739682
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ─────━ 🌟 𝖼𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗇 ✅ # newpost on IG. 🌐 come with me to the @ prada show in Milano. it’s PRADA FW26! - 🖤 ㅤ⠀ ➿➿ ˓ 💙 ˒ ➿➿ ㅤ
custom 51725083094747732222custom 51729071744976179242custom 51724095595867026311
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅟᅟ ᅟᅟ 🤩 . . . ﹫𝗷𝗮̃𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝗎𝗉𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾 ᠉ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗶𝗀 𝗳𝖾𝖾𝖽 ◟💬 : 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗎 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂. 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖾̂. 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖾̂ 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎. 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈. 𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐, 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝗅𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂,
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @baizenupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,423,551 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⬫ ۟ ۪ ៹ 𝗕𝗮𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗻updates 🎧” (@baizenupdates), 108 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baizenupdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.