Channel
@baitlv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
912subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001145426430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baitlv |
| Description | Канал Даниила Баева из солнечного Тель-Авива 🇮🇱 Написать в личку: @the500th |
| Created | 30 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baitlv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 912 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 912 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 28 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
153 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 51.6% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 22.2% | |
| 🗿 | 13 | 8.50% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 7.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.23% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 3.27% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2024 to 15 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сталин? серьезно? вы б сразу путину бы ставили иногда я привожу москву в пример крутого транспорта. понятная навигация, удобная оплата, светофоры, праздники а потом вы находите в кладовке запылившегося вождя и ставите его обратно спасибо! спасибо что не даете забыть что это все только ради маскарада... ну вы даже удивили, я такой быстрой деградации не ждал
😁16❤7🗿4😈3😢1
Video, posted without a caption
😁5
Блин, даже эти тик-ток ребята из метро зетнулись, ну пизда…
😁10🤔3😢3❤1❤🔥1😈1
Слов недостаточно, чтобы описать эту боль… 🎗️🎗️🎗️
❤9😢6🗿3😈1
Материалы по теме, если кому интересно тред у меня в твиттере на иврите: https://x.com/the500th_/status/1839307918929441158
Вот оригинальное тактовое расписание 1982, как тут видно, далеко еще не везде пересадки удобные Но этот план потребовал увеличения расходов SBB (Жд Швейцарии) всего на 1.5%, тогда как количество километро-поездов увеличилось на 31%, а пассажиров в течении 15 лет стало на 40% больше Проект был настолько успешен, что позже лег в более обширную программу Bahn 2000, которая включала в себя и строительство новых тоннеле…
❤7
А придумали и реализовали это все три специалиста, одного из которых зовут Ханс Майнер Вместе с коллегами они организоали "Кружок мечтателей" и сидели по понедельникам придумывали новое расписание, чтобы доказать старшему поколению, что идея работае Интерьвью с Хансом Майнером на немецком https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtrEf22gK5s
❤11
Вот как поезда InterCity прибывают на Bern Hauptbahnhof одновременно, стоят несколько минут и едут дальше Знакомый принцип? Его модно уивдеть часто на ночных маршрутах во многих города Но он также применется и на железной дороге
❤9❤🔥3
Я думаю вы все хоть раз слышали про «тактовое расписание» Во-первых, существует два уровня тактовых расписаний. Первый, когда просто транспорт ходит в такте «каждые 15 минут» и так далее и Integraler Taktfahrplan, Интегрированное Тактовое Расписание, когда несколько линий транспорта друг с другом синхронизированы Но во вторых, я ни раз ни от кого не слышал раньше эту историю и узнал о ней сам буквально на прошлой н…
❤15
Бывший глава MI6 (британской Секретной разведывательной службы), сэр Ричард Дирлав, призвал австралийское правительство под руководством Энтони Албанезе приостановить свою визовую программу для Газы, предупреждая, что эта программа может привести к импорту террора в Австралию. Также, Дирлав заявил, что среди новоприбывших из Газы могут фигурировать и члены иранских разведслужб. Восточный Синдром ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🗿4😁3😢1
А еще когда мы меняли ночной н3, мы заранее сделали вот такие аудиобьявления потому что даже если 12919291 обьявлений повесить, кто-то рандомно может не туда поехать и текст тоже был четкий, ясный, короткий все просрали :) или я ошибаюсь?
❤4
Вот как тексты писать нужно, ёмаё
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @baitlv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 969,045 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бай в Тель-Авиве 🇺🇦🇮🇱” (@baitlv), 912 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baitlv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.