Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

bahda •

@bahdadot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489353301
TypeChannel
Username@bahdadot
DescriptionДроп треків, усіляка пиздатня про музику, іноді про літературу, іноді про кіно, а іноді і закрий єбало (це я собі). Ідентифікую себе як цифровий синтезатор Yamaha DX7.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bahdadot

Growth

239 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:3223no change
9 Aug 2026, 08:4623first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.7%
avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total55
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
368
Videos
14
Links
365

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
525.0%
🔥525.0%
15.00%
🆒15.00%
👍15.00%
💯15.00%
😁15.00%
😈15.00%
😨15.00%
😭15.00%
🥰15.00%
🥴15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎞 КІНО 🎞 Creep (2014). Побачив смішний мємєс і вирішив написать про цей фільм, який дивився майже рік тому (у мене кста є неопубліковані відгуки з 2024 лол🥴) Кажуть, шо фаунд футаге здох. Я вважаю, шо ситуація з ним, як і з будь-яким жанром/піджанром... будь-чого - у нього було гучне народження, свій прайм, потім комерційне гамно, а зараз штиль, де-не-де вспливають hidden gems для поціновувачів. От Кріп це ось ця

🥴1

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

😌 https://youtu.be/jm5CQ02UO5k?si=lf0dazRViBNfkIX6

🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

навалив собі пам'ятку улюблених альбомів. шось я думав буде більше🥲

2

12 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вініл (2016). Вчора додивилися серіал Вініл - і це було шикарно🤌 Шкода, звичайно, що його скасували після 1 сезону, але перед закриттям там були якісь мутки з заміною шоураннера (який між іншим рулив Підпільною імперією і Кланом Сопрано), "творчими розбіжностями", коротше, може і добре, шо сірік помер, а не здох і згніл к хуям на 2 сезоні і проіснував в такому стані ще парочку сезонів. Історія залишилася не до кінця

1💯1

12 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Дія відбувається у Нью-Йорку 1973 і крутиться навколо музичного бізнесу. В західній музиці того періоду бажано бути хоч трохи підкованим, бо герої весь час неймдропят так нещадно, наче ми всіх тих артистів і їхню творчість мали всмоктати разом з молоком матері. Тим не менш, більшу увагу серіал приділяє саме персонажам, їхнім взаємодіям, боротьбі з власними демонами, подоланню криз і реалізації амбіцій. Актори на своє

1👍1

12 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Музика Р О З Й О Б (очевидно). Я очікував більше хард РОКА і КОКА, але я забув, шо 70-ті це бум чорношкірої музики, тому левова частка серіалу присвячена саме їй. Ну і аналогічній музиці до 70-их. В цьому я вбачаю ґадєнкіє загравання з лівацькою повісткою, яка у роки створення шоу як раз набирала оберти (в сюжеті навіть присутній nigga, шо став жертвою музичної індустрії), але на цьому нема якогось тупорилого пропага

🔥1🥰1

12 Jun 2026, 19:48 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Лишилось тільки одне піво https://youtu.be/4lBvkbtBYjU?si=m9Eqc5J1cT0611lQ

1

26 May 2026, 16:01 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я здєсь чісто по фанухайпіть😭 https://youtu.be/qHh-E8wQ36k https://youtu.be/qHh-E8wQ36k https://youtu.be/qHh-E8wQ36k

1

21 May 2026, 15:03 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мій самий довгий сценарний контент so far🔥 Розповідаю про фільм, який відкрив в мені кіноЄссеіста. Лайки, репости, коменти - робіть шо хочте, не соромтеся😘 https://youtu.be/dL7bIVp_5DM https://youtu.be/dL7bIVp_5DM https://youtu.be/dL7bIVp_5DM

🔥1

17 May 2026, 06:54 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Прекрасна музика для ДТП блядь чілової поїздки на самокаті☺️ https://music.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaxj2mcFHdVKeKz4b6SdzFqrs5pl1fQs-&si=Nsa-bE1me2lS2UBd

😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bahdadot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 743,048 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bahda •” (@bahdadot), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bahdadot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.