Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کانال کارگاه مرمت بهارستان قم

@baharestanqoom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

511subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387526338
TypeChannel
Username@baharestanqoom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/baharestanqoom

Growth

51112 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 511 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:55 — 511 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:1612 Aug 2026, 21:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 510–512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:55511no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:16511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.8%
avg views ÷ 511 subscribers
Avg views / post
423
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 November 20257 August 2026)
Views total2,116
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 40s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2343.4%
👍1935.8%
🔥59.43%
😢35.66%
👏23.77%
🥰11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC347 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

گذار فرش دستباف ایرانی به عصر دیجیتال ضرورت برندسازی، تولید محتوای تخصصی و اعتمادسازی در بازار معاصر @baharestanqoom

1 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC364 viewsread 12 August 2026

isna.ir/xdWNgg بررسی یک ماده طبیعی تازه برای تغییر در بافت فرش ظرفیت‌های «نخ بامبو» برای تولید فرش دست‌باف ایرانی ......................................... خیانت خیانت خیانت . . . @baharestanqoom

31 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC491 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbdSazro05P/?igsh=MTk4dGUyMTZhd2VrMA== @baharestanqoom

7 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 12 August 2026

یک تختش کم هست ! #قم #کاشان #خانه_تاریخی_عطارها #آموزش #هنر #کارگاه #فرش #قالین #زیبا #فرهنگ #هادی_پورجهان #پژوهشکده_فرش #پژوهشکده_فرش_ایران #پژوهش_فرش #هوش_مصنوعی #هوش_مصنوعی_و_آینده #هوش_مصنوعی_فرش https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDYyRmXIclZ/?igsh=YzEzb25wNnVvd2Rm

4 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC284 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

دانش فرش، به اندازه خودِ فرش ارزشمند است. هر واژه‌ای که نادرست به کار رود، می‌تواند سال‌ها به یک باور اشتباه تبدیل شود. هدف از این ویدئو، نقد افراد نیست؛ بلکه دعوتی است به دقت بیشتر در بیان مفاهیم و پاسداری از دانش اصیل فرش دست‌باف ایران. اگر قرار است از این میراث ارزشمند سخن بگوییم، بیایید آن را درست و مستند روایت کنیم. قالی را پاس بداریم. @baharestanqoom

👍10🔥3

11 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,060 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

قالیچه ابریشمی زربفت بافت: تبریز دوره فرهنگی: صفوی قدمت: سده‌های ۱۰ و ۱۱ هجری قمری اندازه: بلندا: ۲۱۳ سانتی‌متر پهنا: ۱۵۸ سانتی‌متر شماره اثر در موزه ملی ایران: ۲۳۰ هنر فرشبافی در سده‌های دهم و یازدهم هجری قمری، هم‌پای سایر هنرهای تزیینی، از حمایت و توجه ویژه دربار صفوی برخوردار بود. بی‌شک، عالی‌ترین و چشمگیرترین قالی‌های ایرانی در این سده‌ها، به‌ویژه در عصر حکومت شاه‌طهماسب و شاه‌عباس، خلق شدند. در این دوره، سبک‌ها

5🔥2

9 Jun 2026, 18:55 UTC878 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

روز ملی فرش (قالی)را به همه دوستان، هنرمندان، استادان و دلدادگان قالی ایرانی تبریک می‌گویم. قالی، تنها تار و پود نیست. روایت عشق، صبوری، هنر و هویت این سرزمین است. امیدوارم همواره پاسدار این میراث ارزشمند باشیم و نقش‌های زیبای زندگی را در کنار یکدیگر ماندگار کنیم. روز ملی قالی مبارک 🌹 @baharestanqoom

8🥰1

9 Jun 2026, 16:43 UTC834 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔶️ شماره پنجم نشریه «دستباف» منتشر شد. روایتی از آینده قالی ایرانی در دست نسل نو؛ آینده ای که در دستان نسل نو شکل می‌گیرد. ر‌وایت ها را بخوانید صداها را بشنوید و همراه این مسیر باشید. ✔️ نسخه آنلاین و پادکست نشریه در لینک زیر 👇 https://guereh.com/pdf-reader/dastbaf-05 ..... @baharestanqoom

👍4

5 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC811 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

این یک ویدئوی آموزشی است ویژه حرفه ای ها! رفوگری فقط ترمیم یک فرش نیست.روایت دوباره‌ی خاطراتی‌ست که میان تار و پود زمان گم شده‌اند. رفوگر با صبر و عشق، زخمی را می‌بندد که سال‌ها بر جان فرش نشسته است. آن‌چنان که گویی هیچ‌گاه گره‌ای از هم نگسسته و هیچ خاطره‌ای از دست نرفته است. #رفوگری #مرمت_فرش #فرش_دستباف #هنر_ایرانی #هادی_پورجهان https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZLDqB2IeF_/?igsh=MW1yb2VieHl4dmxlc

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @baharestanqoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 920,120 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال کارگاه مرمت بهارستان قم” (@baharestanqoom), 511 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baharestanqoom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.