Channel
@badthingsconfdaily
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
276subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003778266937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @badthingsconfdaily |
| Description | ะะพั ะดะปั ัะตะนะบะพะฒ: @badthingscftakes_bot |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/badthingsconfdaily |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 276 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 276 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 August 2026 โ 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,007 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
134 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 64 | 47.8% | |
| customย 5296760605246525427 | 32 | 23.9% | |
| customย 5294368759434218249 | 22 | 16.4% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 4.48% | |
| customย 5294327029531972500 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 2.24% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.746% | |
| ๐ฅ | 1 | 0.746% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉskllmnia ๐ผ๐ป X #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
โค1๐1๐1๐ฅ1customย 52967606052465254271
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉmalslovelybunny ๐ผ๐ป TT #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
customย 52943687594342182491
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
ะ ะทะฐะผะตัะบะฐั ัะธัะพะฒะฐะป #ัะตะนะบ @badthingscftakes_bot
customย 52943687594342182494โค1
Signed takes bad things cf
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉxDoono7_7 ๐ผ๐ป X #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
customย 52943687594342182493โค1
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ๐ง๐ช/๐๐ช๐ะณััะพ โผ๏ธ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉloveiock ๐ผ๐ป TT #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
โค3customย 52967606052465254271
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉyayak1_things ๐ผ๐ป TT #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
โค3customย 52943687594342182491
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉivan.irl_ ๐ผ๐ป TT #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
customย 52967606052465254274โค3๐1customย 52943687594342182491
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
ะะธะฝะธ ะฐะฝะธะผะบะฐ ะฟะพ ะธะฒะฐะฝะดัั ะขะณะบ @lincoartchn #ัะตะนะบ @badthingscftakes_bot
โค7๐2customย 52967606052465254272๐1
Signed takes bad things cf
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉcloudystormy98 ๐ผ๐ป X #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
customย 52967606052465254278โค4customย 52943270295319725001customย 52943687594342182491
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉzbxllmfylig ๐ผ๐ป TT #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
โค3customย 52943270295319725001
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
๐คฉ๐คฉ โค๏ธ ๐๐ cr๐คฉmisdao_27 on tt #ะดะตะนะปะธ @badthingsconfdaily
customย 52967606052465254279โค2
Signed http
๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ใ ค๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐:๐คฉk9yllaryx ๐ผ๐ป X #ะดะตะนะปะธ๐คฉ@badthingsconfdaily
โค5customย 52943270295319725003
Signed ๐ฅป ื ื ๐ต๐๐ผ_๐๐ผ ! ื ื
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @badthingsconfdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 251,903 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@badthingsconfdaily named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโ ๐๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ฐ๐ณ | ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ ใโ (@badthingsconfdaily), 276 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/badthingsconfdaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.