Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for '' ᴢ00ʙʟᴇ '' ¿

Channel

'' ᴢ00ʙʟᴇ '' ¿

@backroomszooble

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004244249196
TypeChannel
Username@backroomszooble
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/backroomszooble

Growth

2311 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 23 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:33 — 23 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:1612 Aug 2026, 16:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:3323no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:1623first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
167.4%
avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total539
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊1747.2%
👾1027.8%
👀822.2%
💔12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

1NT3R4CT10N.🌟🌟 "Зубл" б3жал4 п11таясь загн4ть их к ст3н3 илN в как0й-н1бцдь тупик. Её кр11л0 в0л0чил0сь сз4ди, ц4пл6я мус0р и щ3пки… В п0пытк4х изб4витсЯ от нNх, 0на п0терял4 н3мн0г0 вр3м3ни. Д0г0нит ли?…💋 — В0т с^^*кN. З4б4вн0. 0бычн0 ж33ртвы бр0саЮт др6г др66га и б3гут вразн0б0й, сп4сая св0и шк6ры. Стр4х сильн33 ч3лов3чн0сти. Н0 эт0т кл00ун? 0н же руг4етсЯ, н0 н33 отпуск43т р6ку вт0р0го. Смешн0й. Какой см3шн000й

💊4👀1👾1

4 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC25 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

1NT3R4CT10N.🌟🌟 Нигд3 н3т п0к0я. "З6бл" услыш4л4 вп3р3ди н3привычн11й ш6м… Ш4ги? Ч3л0в3к? Эт0 же был… ч3л0в33333к¿❤️ Дв4 ч3лов333к4? К4к4я уд4ч4. "З6бл" п0дбNра3тс6 бл11же. Ей сл1111шн0, к4к 0ни в0зятся. 0ни переживают. 0ни б0ятся. Др0ж4т.🌟 В худш33м сл6ча3 0на пр0ст0 см0ж3т их 0тогн4ть, чт0бы эт11 ж4лкNе с6щ3ств4 н3 м3шалN её п0к0ю, в лучш3м же… 0на см0ж3т н4сытитЬс6 сп0лн444. — Д3рж11тесь, с^%3#и "З6бл" пр11слу

💊3👀1👾1

2 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC28 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Чт0 теп3рь? Н3ужт0 ты, "З666бл", р3шил4 сД0%^*тЬ с г0л0духN? Н3д4вн33 р3ш3ни3,0дн4к0,к4з4л0сь пр4вNльн11м. 💋💋💋 0на шл4 д4льш3 п0 ж444лкNм к0рид0рам в п0иск4х н0в0г0 уб3жNща и, 3слN п0в3з3т, 3ды¿ Н0 с1лы б11лN н4 исх0д3. Даж3 х1щник4м ин0гд4 нуж3н п3рер11в в 0х0т3. 💋 0на н4шл4 укр0мн03 м3сто и ст4л4 з4л1зыв4ть р4нЫ. П3рьЯ 1з кр11л4 п4д4л1и бесш6мн0. Т3мны3. 0кр0в4вл3нны3. Т0нки3. 0на п0нял4, чт0 вр6д л1 😀см0ж

💊3👀2👾2

29 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

1NT3R4CT10N.🌟 З4 чт0 0н4 изв11нил4сь? 0н4 ж3 н3 д0лж666666 Чт000 с т0б000й? П0ч3м6 ты ст00ишь н4 м333ст333? Ч3м т66 л6чше 33??????? Т666 ты т6666 ж3 т4кая ж3 с0плячК4, с0пл66чк4, с0пл666666чк44444!!??? Х11щн11к11 н4ст0ящ11к х11щн11к11 н3 в3д6т с3бя т4к. 0тпуст11ть ж33ртву вс3 р4вн0 чт0 уйт11 ум111111рррр4тьььь д0бр0в00000льн000000 Б6стр33 б6стре3 быстр3333333 Вс3г0 0д11н взм4х — и 0н4 д44же н3 пойм33т н11чего н111

👀1👾1💊1

24 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

1NT3R4CT10N.🌟 Она не бежит¿¿¿ П0ч3м6 0н4 н4 б4жNNNт? Она узн4ла "её" и назв4ла по им33ни¿¿¿ Эт0 имя… Как же давно к "ней" не обращались по им3ни. Ср3ди этих бл6666дкNх ст3н такие в333щи зн4ч3ния н3 Им3ют. К0гти з4мерли в с4нтиметрах от мягк0г0 тела "Р4гаты". "Зубл" н3 дв1галась. Т4к н3пох0же на н33 — в0000т ж3 ж333ртва б3ри кус4й б3ри ск0р333 б333р1 к666с44444й Ж444лкая перепуганная и уставш4я Т4к4я н3 сг0дNтся ни

💊3👀2👾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @backroomszooble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 960,654 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“'' ᴢ00ʙʟᴇ '' ¿” (@backroomszooble), 23 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/backroomszooble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.