Потратил на этот веер 2 месяца жизни, стоило того же?
❤🔥12❤4🤔2🐳1💯1

Channel
@backpalm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
248subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001626360895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @backpalm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/backpalm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 248 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 251 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 252 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 252 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
254 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 27.6% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 23.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 53 | 20.9% | |
| 🐳 | 30 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 3.15% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 3.15% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 2.76% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.36% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.57% | |
| custom 6325636659706594831 | 2 | 0.787% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.787% | |
| custom 6325709223179060935 | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.394% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Потратил на этот веер 2 месяца жизни, стоило того же?
❤🔥12❤4🤔2🐳1💯1
Коллапс метавселенных - это когда в одном ролике пересекаются Илья Сатир, фокусы и циан 🤝🏼
❤7🐳4❤🔥2
Кибертраколук
❤11❤🔥2custom 63256366597065948312🏆1🐳1🔥1
Примерно такие штуки происходят на наших close-up шоу после каждого показа)
🐳2
В среду наш киноклуб #НеДляВсех отправляется в миры Вуди Аллена! Мы покажем фильм «Магия лунного света» и вместе с главным героем картины, выдающимся иллюзионистом, попытаемся разоблачить очаровательную шарлатанку, якобы умеющую вызывать духов умерших. Визуальная красота «Магии лунного света» завораживает, а сюжет романтической комедии скрывает тонкое философское высказывание режиссёра о человеческой природе. Это од…
🐳3👍1👻1
Что здесь происходит?
❤🔥22😍5🐳3🔥2
Отрывок нашего лайва с показа фильма «Shade»
🔥19❤7🐳3
11.02 (послезавтра) состоится показ фильма Shade (Ловкие руки) с разбором отсылок, исторических фактов, шулерских приемов от иллюзиониста и карточного техника/консультанта казино. После фильма - небольшое иллюзионное шоу в close-up формате. За билетами - в личные сообщения канала (либо ко мне напрямую)
❤12🤝4🐳2
Появились билеты на наш магический перформанс + показ «Иллюзии обмана 3» Для приобретения пишите в личные сообщения канала, либо мне напрямую)
❤5🐳3❤🔥2
Один из моих любимых трюков и принципов в ментализме
🔥12💯6🐳3❤2
Желающие прийти - пишите в личные сообщения канала, ну или мне напрямую)
👍4
Вчера посмотрели ужасно-прекрасный фильм "Орудия", который подобрал для нас куратор Иван Пуляев в рамках концепции Кино Не Для Всех. Следующая встреча с Иваном назначена на 4 февраля. Какую кинокартину он предложит нам оценить - скоро узнаем... НО! никто не мешает нАм, помимо регулярных - раз в две недели - показов, иногда устраивать иные киновкрапления. Иногда это делает Александр Мачевский, который очень любит…
🔥10👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @backpalm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 404,779 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cardician” (@backpalm), 248 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/backpalm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.