Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Backend Арбитража

@backend_vietami

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

637subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003062742646
TypeChannel
Username@backend_vietami
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/backend_vietami

Growth

5496375936 August 2026 — 549 subscribers6 August 2026 — 549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 562 subscribers14 August 2026 — 637 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 536–650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:25637+75
7 Aug 2026, 09:37562+13
6 Aug 2026, 18:18549no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:36549first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.1%
avg views ÷ 637 subscribers
Avg views / post
453
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,790
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5641.2%
🔥3626.5%
🤣1511.0%
😁1410.3%
👀118.09%
🤪32.21%
🙈10.735%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC129 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @affsagemodeFile

NUTRA PLAYBOOK Аналіз ЦА, типи та структура промок, підходи до креативів і ГЕО-стратегії. Інформація здебільшого для новачків, але в кінці 25-го джуни з моєї команди норм так забустили перформанс, просто дотримуючись базових речей, описаних у цьому мануалі. Аля, улю! 📣 Підписатись на канал | Google White Pages

🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❗️ Подгон для нутристов Знаю, что у нас сидят ребята из разных вертикалей, но для тех кто льют 💊 у коллеги по цеху вышел целый плейбук (11 страниц презенташки с годнотой по нутре) Если что, вирусов там нет, я проверил на себе)) Для новичков или практикующих обязательно сохраните и подпишитесь на канал!

8

5 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC234 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Также, ребята, не забываем про наш чатик, где можем задавать вопросы и просто общаться: https://t.me/+3vPZGcedjhNlN2Ri

4

5 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC258 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Апдейт по Лебовскому: скамерский бот выдал админку и обошел 2FA 🤯 Вадим вышел в кружке с деталями, и наша гипотеза про не проверенный скилл с GitHub полностью подтвердилась. Но вскрылись новые интересные подробности, о которых не знали: 1. Попытка угнать Binance была ещё позавчера Скамеры не сразу выкатили спам. Ещё два дня назад они пытались вывести деньги с его Бинанса, но тогда Вадим перепроверил все активны

11

5 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC349 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ: Как не стать следующим Лебовским: мини-гайд по железу и безопасности в 2026 году 🛡 После поста про взлом в комментах сразу полетели вопросы: "А как себя обезопасить, если постоянно юзаешь нейронки, вайбкодишь?" Рассказываю, как устроен нормальный сетап, при котором даже если ты случайно зальешь себе вирусняк или кликнешь по фишинг ссылочке) 🖥 Комп: сносим Windows или ставим 2-й системой Linux В 2026

🔥161

5 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,250 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

☠️ Хакнули Лебовского (заскамили $3 000+ на безобидных скиллах для Claude) ☠️ Ребят, сегодня с утра в арбитражном комьюнити произошел классический, но от этого не менее болючий факап: Вадима, автора канала Де депи, Лебовські!? ломанули. С канала пошел спам фишинговыми чеками на 150 USDT, а подписчики, решившие успеть на "халяву", суммарно занесли скамерам больше $3 000. Там вынесли все: куки, сессии TG, Discord, In

10

3 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC352 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Дефолтный вечер уставшего вайбкодера) 💀

🤣15🔥3🤪3

2 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC462 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Также не забывайте делиться в чатик получилось или нет) https://t.me/+3vPZGcedjhNlN2Ri

4

2 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC730 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Здарова Вьетнам! 🇻🇳 В прошлом году Гугл уже раздавал халяву для студентов в виде подписке Google AI PRO, а в этот раз чуть попроще, но тоже полезно для тех, у кого вообще никакой подписки нету. На этот раз раздают Google AI Plus также на 12 месяцев с такими плюшками: - Gemini 3.1 Pro из 2x лимитами(но не для Antigravity) - Фото и видео генерация (Nano Banana, Omni) - Gemini в Gmail, Docs і Slides - NotebookLM с пов

🔥122

31 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC439 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ребята, хочу также вам напомнить за наш чатик, в котором можем общаться и задавать интересные вопросы: https://t.me/+3vPZGcedjhNlN2Ri

30 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC475 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вечер Вьетнам! 🇻🇳 🔈 Сегодня пришёл с хорошей новостью для любителей автоматизации рутинных задач: моя любимая компания OpenAI решила выпустить апдейт цен на свои последние модели GPT-5.6. Так что ситуация сейчас следующая: - Цену Luna снизили на 80%, из-за чего эта модель становится ещё вкуснее для простых задач: $0,20 за 1 млн входных токенов и $1,20 за 1 млн выходных. Разницу можно увидеть на графике) - Цену Te

12

29 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC671 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁14👀4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @backend_vietami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,278 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Backend Арбитража” (@backend_vietami), 637 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/backend_vietami.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.