Channel
@bachekhaani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
640subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003929356413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bachekhaani |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 6 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bachekhaani |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 640 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 640 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,491 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
69 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 13.0% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این به لحاظ خیالپروری و پرورش خلاقیت موردعلاقهی منه. اگر کتابهای پیتر اچ رینولدز رو دیده باشین این شبیهترین نمونهی ایرانی بهشه از نظر من (اگر ندیدین هم تسلیت میگم، چون اکثرشون الان دیگه مدتهاست چاپتمومن و خیلی کاری از دستتون برنمیاد😆، ولی خیلی معرکهن. «نقطه» رو لااقل ببینین ازش.) شخصیت اصلی داستان، راز، بچهایه که هی توضیف میکنه یه چیزهایی رو دیده که خیلی جالبن و هیچ بزرگتری نمیبیندشون و بچه هی اصرار میکن…
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
این هم به نسبت جدیده، تو خوبها جدیدترینه یعنی فکر کنم. یه ذره هم نامحسوس تم فکری-فلسفی و شینسوکهای داره. کلا هم کارهای دالوند هرکدوم یه خلاقیت و ژانگولری دارن که من میپسندم، قبلی هم مثلا «غولبوسکن حرفهای» بود که تصویرگرش البته دالوند بود، و نوع کاغذش یکی درمیون پوستی بود و بازیش با تصویرهای کتاب بود که یه جور متفاوتی میشدن طی اون فرآیند و خیلی جالب بود، هرچند داستان چیز خاصی نداشت. (عکس الان ازش ندارم، بعدا م…
❤4
«هیچکس حیوون حسابتون نمیکنه.»😆
❤3
یکی این. تم کلی داستان کلیشه و تکرارشونده ست، مدرسهی حیوانات مختلف جنگل. ولی زبانش و معاصر و شبیهما بودن دیالوگهای داستان باعث میشه من خیلی بخندم باهاش، عکس یک صفحهش رو میذارم بهپیوست حالا. مناسب بچههایی که تازه میخوان برن مدرسه و بزرگترهایی که میخوان با کتاب کودک تالیفی بخندن. برای ۵-۶ سال به بالا خوبه، نشر طوطی(فاطمی)
❤5
امشب اومدهم چندتا کتاب کودک فارسی و تالیفی معرفی کنم. اگر من رو در دنیای بیرون از این کانال بشناسید (نه که خیلی سلبریتی هستم😆 یعنی اگر از دوستان و آشنایان جهان بیرون از اینجا باشید) میدانید که کار و زندگی اصلیم داستان معاصر فارسیه، کتاب کودک اونیه که در کنارش ادامهش میدم. ولی حتی من (که یعنی فازم این نیست که کلا ایرانی رو چه به نویسندگی مثلا و برعکس از اونام که «فاکنر چیه ما خودمون گلشیریمذگان داریم» #مقایسه…
👍5🤨1
این دوتا هم موضوعشون یک مسئلهایه که مهمه بسیار و با جنگ پیوند خورده بسیار، مسئلهی مهاجرت ناخواسته، آوارگی، پناهندگی. خیلی دیدهم که گفتهن اینها به بچهها یاد میده که ترسو بودن و فرار رو بر قرار ترجیح بدن. که آخه این چه حرفیه. چطور واقعا از کتابی با محتوای آوارگی ناشی از جنگ میتونی به این برسی. بنظرم هردوی اینها دوتا ارزش همزمان دارن، یکی اینکه با پیامدهای ناگزیر جنگ آشنا میکنن بچهها رو و این در راستای توضیح این…
❤4
این یکی تا جاییکه میدونم چاپتمومه و کلا هم علمیفرهنگیهای کودک (پرنده آبی)بهنسبت سخت گیر میان یه ذره در سالهای اخیر، ولی معرکه ست و هرجا دیدین در تهیهش شک نکنید. یک داستان نسبتا طولانی طنز و بسیار بامزه ست، که به بهترین شکل برای کوچیکترها و حتی بزرگترها تبیین میکنه بیمعنایی کل پروسهی جنگ رو. یه اردک میره تو لولهی توپ و اینا نمیتونن درش بیارن و تا درنیارن نمیتونن شلیک کنن و اون م خودش درنمیاد و خلاصه انواع …
❤4🕊1
یه دونه جنگ هم چشمه زده، این بیشتر به درد بزرگسالان بهدنبالکپشنقصاراینستا میخوره راستش بنظرم.😆 ولی خب والدین از ما خیلی میخرنش، درنتیجه نمیدونم شاید بچهها هم چیزی درش میبینن که من نمیبینم. داستان به اون معنا نداره، یه سری گزارهی ضدجنگه.
❤3💔1
اولین چیزی که همه میشناسن قاعدتا اینه، بنظر من یکی از بهترین کارهای دیوید کالی که خودش یکی از بهترینهای حوزه کتاب کودک و حومه ست. :)) درباره سرباز تنهایی که تو ذهنش یه تصوری از دشمن و آرمانهای جنگی که وسطش گیر افتاده ساخته، تا اینکه یک وقتی متوجه میشه دشمن روبهروش هم شباهتهای زیادی به خودش داره، مثل خودش آدمه و مثل خودش تنهاست و مثل خودش نمیدونه چرا داره میجنگه و کل قضیه براش میره زیر سوال.
❤4💔1
این تذکر مهم رو باید بدم که این کتابها انتخاب کسیه که تحت هر شرایطی بنظرش باید و باید و باید با بچهها بد بودن جنگ و پرهیز ازش و لزوم حرکت به سمت صلح حرف زد. یعنی اصل اول برای من اینه، اینکه ما جنگجو بار بیاریم و وقتی دولت متخاصم حمله کرد چی و لزوم دفاع از خانه و وطن و همهچیز «در مورد کودکان» بنظرم در درجهی دوم اهمیت قرار میگیره و بخصوص در این پهنهی جغرافیایی در بزرگسالی به اندازهی کافی فرصت خواهند داشت که با ا…
❤6👍3👏1
مدتی که این مثنوی تاخیر شد اولش بخاطر زیرورو شدن زندگی شخصی بنده بود (اسبابکشی داشتم، مشکل حادتری متصور نشوید😆)، ولی بعدتر هم بخاطر زیرورو شدن وضعیت جایی که داریم توش زندگی میکنیم و یکدفعه صلح نیمبند و نهچندانجدیش یکشبه تبدیل میشه به جنگی که هنوز به خونهی تو نرسیده، ولی میدونی تا دو وجب اونورتر پیش اومده و اونقدری هست که همهی کارهای عادی روزمرهت رو در یک بیمعنایی مطلق فرو ببره. و آدم اصلا نمیدونه دیگه …
❤4😭2👍1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bachekhaani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,306,887 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بچهخوانی” (@bachekhaani), 640 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bachekhaani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.