오늘 200M 간다!

Channel
백감님의 미니홈피
@bacgammini
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003820123681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bacgammini |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bacgammini |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 66 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 66 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 65 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 291.1%
- avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 192
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.625%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (7 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,690 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 641
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 112
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
[💜 테스트넷에서 잉크스테이킹, 바이백라우터 발견] 지금 INK 테스트넷 에서 잉크 스테이킹과 바이백라우터의 트렌젠션이 발견되었습니다 Tydro측 발언과 테스트넷 트렌젝션을 종합해 봤을 때 진짜 곧인가?라는 생각이 드네요 NADO야 가보자 Tydro야 가보자 KRAKEN아 가보자
자 또 한 명 낚았구요~
👎1
하리 EVM 죽고있어! 에디슨: 유저 평균 수준
👀
※Stonkbroker 파운더 @OxSimpleFarmer ✅Stonkbroker NFT, $STONKBROKER 수요 - NFT: 주식 에어드랍, 이더리움 익스포저, 런치패드 에어드랍 - 토큰: 파멸적인 소각 메커니즘, NFT 가격 추종 (ETF성격), CEX 상장 (ERC-20 token임 NOT ERC-404) ⚫주식 에어드랍 재원 1. Anvil AMM Swap: NFT <-> 토큰 거래 수수료의 70% 2. NFT Sales Royalties <-> NFT 판매 로열티의 50% 3. Stonk Launcher <-> 런치패드 수수료의 70% 4. Stonk Exchange / V-DEX <-> V-DEX 수수료의 50% 5. Lending Fees (Anvil) <-> 대출 수수료의 100% NFT를 보유한다고 해서 주식이 …
🔥 F.U.E.L {커뮤니티 주최 이벤트} 팀 구성 : 2인 1팀 (5라운드 진행) 총 상금 : 100,000 $FOGO (130만원 상당) 날짜 : 8월 12일 13:00 UTC (한국시간 8월 12일 22:00) 장소 : 슈퍼루미날 월드 상금 분배 🥇 1위 30,000 $FOGO 🥈 2위 20,000 $FOGO 🥉 3위 15,000 $FOGO 4위 10,000 $FOGO 5위 7,000 $FOGO 🎁 그 외 모든 참가자 남은 18,000 $FOGO 분배 게임 미리보기 : https://x.com/0x_snatch/status/2085731820340232401
.....? 내가 콜한건가
⚫나온지 3주 됨 ⚫벌써 로빈후드 체인 수익 3등 ⚫1 Stonkbroker NFT = 666,666 $Stonkbroker 토큰 ⚫이더 강세가 될 것으로 예상되는 가운데 이더리움 가격이 오르면 토큰과 NFT 가격 전부 올라갈 예정 ⚫벌써 $Stonkbroker 토큰 공급량의 18%를 소각 완료 ⚫LP 수수료 NFT홀더에게 배분 & 토큰 바이백 ⚫4일 뒤 런치패드 오픈예정 해당 런치패드 발생 수익 토큰 바이백 ⚫$Clockin이라는 토큰이 런치패드로 나올 건데 이것도 Stonkbroker NFT 보유자에게 수수료 주고 마켓캡 일정 수준 달성시 NFT 보유자에게 $Clockin 에어드랍 ⚫파운더가 어제, 오늘 계속 팟캐스트 진행, 목소리 너드같고 디스코드에서 활발함. 유쾌함 ⚫오늘 옥스포드 사전에 "Stonkbroker" 등재하…
Stonkbroker 옥스포드 단어 등재
1 StonkBrokers = 1 ape Still early
🌪️ 쉬었습니다 네 뭐요
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bacgammini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 393,942 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“백감님의 미니홈피” (@bacgammini), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bacgammini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.