Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✨Thesaurus thaumasion✨

Channel

✨Thesaurus thaumasion✨

@babylontimes60

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

370subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003983605241
TypeChannel
Username@babylontimes60
DescriptionИсторик древности, лингвист и вообще "гуманитарный Бэтмен". 🤭 Здесь делюсь своими идеями, знаниями и найденными гемами из Ютуба и книг со своими комментариями. 🤌 История, языки, наука, философия и этика, мировая (не пост-СССР) политика. 📖
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/babylontimes60

Growth

3707 Aug 2026, 19:35 — 370 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:20 — 370 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:358 Aug 2026, 06:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 369–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:20370no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:35370first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.1%
avg views ÷ 370 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (27 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,738
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67
Videos
1
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5750.9%
🔥2522.3%
❤‍🔥119.82%
👀54.46%
👍43.57%
💯43.57%
32.68%
🐳32.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC50 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О буквенном принципе письма и происхождении алфавита 🔤 Буквенный (фонографический) принцип письма не является, вопреки расхожему предубеждению, какой-то логической и обязательной стадией эволюции письменности – и произошел практически единственный раз акцидентально ("случайно") и в одном единственном месте – у того самого народа. ✡️ Это произошло после многих столетий взаимодействия египетской и месопотамской (клин

33💯2👍1

6 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC82 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✍️💓🤭 Заметил, что в полумертвом ВК некоторые паблики жанра "литературные подборки" до сих пор делятся моими старыми постами без указания авторства – да ещё и редактируя текст (сами или нейронкой) под нейтральный стиль, выхолащивая что именно я хотел сказать о книгах. А легко определяется, что взято почти полностью у меня, потому что там есть иногда не самые известные работы. ☠ Тогда уж! – буду постить сам снова, уже

6👀3

6 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Медаль в честь Египетского похода Наполеона 😊💜🤩 «Между тем 5 июля в Каир пришла весть, что армия неверных провела высадку, штурмовала и взяла Александрию, что армия эта имеет весьма многочисленную пехоту, но лишена кавалерии. Беи и их киашифы испускали крики радости. В Каире устроили иллюминацию. "Это арбузы, которые надо разрезать", — говорили они. Не было мамлюка, который не обещал себе срезать сотню голов; эта ар

🔥64

4 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC110 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем хорошего вечера! ✨ Подписывайтесь ещё на мой Твиттер и Инстаграм, сейчас пощу из музейного и прогулочного. 🏛️💞🫯

9🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто вероятнее построил египетские пирамиды? 🤩

  1. Инопланетяне 👽49%
  2. Рабы 👸51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC146 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Жила в Китае одна женщина, которая свыше 20 лет помогала одному монаху. Она построила ему небольшую хижину и кормила его, тогда как он занимался медитацией. Наконец ей захотелось узнать, насколько он продвинулся за это время. Чтобы определить это, она заручилась помощью одной очень чувственной девушки. "Подойди и обними его, – сказала женщина, – а потом внезапно спроси его: Что теперь?" Девушка пригласила монаха к

🔥12❤‍🔥71

1 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC182 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О разговорах с рыбой, и о пришедших из моря людях-рыбах – которые, по мнению месопотамцев, научили их уму-разуму, цивилизации. 🤩☃😋 «В городе Эреду, да прославится его имя среди черноголовых, жил искусный руками и чистый духом Адапа. Каждый день в любую погоду рыбу он ловить отправлялся. Были ею сыты служители храма Эйа, кормились ею все жители города, мужи и жены, старики и дети. В то утро море еле плескало волнами

7🐳3

30 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC187 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Было? 🤔 Воистину: вельможи голодны и в отчаянии. Слуги обслуживаются [...] из-за жалоб. Воистину: человек ожесточенный говорит: если бы я знал, где бог, то я принес бы ему жертву. Воистину: [право] в стране (существует лишь) по названию своему. [Г]рех это то, что творят они (т. е. люди), говоря ложь во имя его. Воистину: воины бегут к мешкам (купца), подобно грабителям;; расхищается все имущество того. Воистину: жив

6💯2

29 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC170 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О постсоциалистическом творчестве Как состояние выжженной пустыни после профанации форм (соцреализм, сталинский классицизм) указывает, на самом деле, на нечто первичное в языке и творчестве: любое высказывание и так уже стоит в ряду других — и потому не обязано нарочито противопоставлять себя имеющемуся многоголосию, чтобы быть по-своему оригинальным. В тему советую посмотреть страничку и работы Марии Пишвановой.

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @babylontimes60. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz35 voters

Кто вероятнее построил египетские пирамиды? 🤩

  1. Инопланетяне 👽49%
  2. Рабы 👸51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 391,536 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨Thesaurus thaumasion✨” (@babylontimes60), 370 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babylontimes60.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.