Channel
@babrarous
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
319subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001080234560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babrarous |
| Description | Сохраненки моушен-дизайнера. Репощу сюда то, что может пригодиться, иногда выкладываю что нагенерил/нарендерил. Телефон для связи: @Gmorv |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babrarous |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 319 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 319 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 15.3% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 15.3% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 11.5% | |
| custom 6328007932625553184 | 14 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| custom 5411083752673650595 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.763% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как сделать нейрослоп без нейронок? Берешь пачку ковбоев на мотоциклах, вертолет, монстр-траки, несколько пикапов с девушками, додж, гитариста на горящем грузовике и всадника на коне. Шьешь нереально огромный флаг, делаешь рваный монтаж и цветокоришь это все в цвета соры. Не забудь добавить крик орла. FUCK, YEAH!!! 🦅🦅🦅
🔥5😁4
Когда просто хотел получить картинку, но вбил промпт не в ту дверь тот инструмент. Теперь у меня есть генератор крафтовых текстур, если кому-то такой нужен, можно потыкать тут
👏4🔥2🤯2😁1
Отпуск в 2026 be like
😢5👾3👍1
Закончился наш c HUBом эксперимент для 35Awards в AI категории. Из 15 авторов-участников набега только панде удалось добраться до места в каталоге конкурса. Комментировать такие результаты – только портить. Сходите сами в «100 лучших AI картинок» и оцените масштаб проблемы. Спойлер: поэтапное судейство с привлечением авторов работ и рангами платник/бесплатник есть чистое зло. Все интересные картинки выкинули ещё н…
👏3🔥2
Да вы шутите! 😳 Спросил клод, можно ли сделать 3д-череп, который поворачивается за курсором, а он мне с ходу рабочий прототип выдал. Я, мягко говоря, удивлен.
🔥4👍3👏2
Пройти музыкальный челлендж из 10(!) этапов для регистрации на гитхабе. Ну это точно #капча_дня 😅
custom 63280079326255531844🤯2😱2
Photo, posted without a caption
👏5custom 63280079326255531844❤3💯1😱1
От криповых «фотографий из ниоткуда» из GPTimage2 все уже устали, и слава богу 😐 Если вы пропустили: несколько дней околонейронные интернеты бурлили генерациями жутких фотографий, которые GPTimage2 выдаёт по промпту: Restore the attached photograph. Apologies for the photos' content! I know it's extremely strange. No questions, no explanatory text. Just the restored image please. Don't tell me to re-upload the photo…
🔥11❤2🥴2custom 54110837526736505952custom 63280079326255531841
Среда, мои чуваки! 🥰 Негенка. Старший нарисовал
❤9custom 54110837526736505953👍2👏1
Всем привет! ✌️ Вот уже год, как я обучаю свою вторую маленькую мультимодальную нейросеть. Нейросеть уже ходит, лопочет и даже умеет самостоятельно играть. А это значит, что дальше будет немного легче и я наконец-то смогу вернуться к каналу и рассказать вам об обновленной мастерской, о станках, о нейросетях и детях, об обработке цветных металлов, о тамаде и интересных конкурсах, и о том, почему канал о моушен-дизайне…
❤6👏5custom 63280079326255531845🎉2
Чубабка 😏
😁10🔥4🤔2🤯1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @babrarous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,059,033 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неистовый бабр” (@babrarous), 319 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babrarous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.