Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дивовижний світ веброзробки

@babichdev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,938subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002631530540
TypeChannel
Username@babichdev
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/babichdev

Growth

2,9362,9382,9377 August 2026 — 2,936 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,936 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,938 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,936–2,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:422,938+2
7 Aug 2026, 20:162,936no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:022,936first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.8%
avg views ÷ 2,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total13,420
Reactions total342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

741 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38051.3%
😁16021.6%
🔥14920.1%
👍405.40%
🤔121.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 741reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,110 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Маю надію, всі в порядку після цієї ночі. Задонатьте пару гривень сьогодні на якийсь збір.

34

29 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,310 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Товариство, тут завтра у Львові буде тусовка, тож, як маєте час і натхнення — долучайтесь! Буде смішний (сподіваюсь) стендап — про айтішників і їхню любов до ШІ; Буде збір коштів на потреби ЗСУ; Будуть танці — DJ set і літній open air, де можна просто відпочити, познайомитися з новими людьми та класно провести вечір. 30 липня, 17:00 «ПРОСТІР», Парк Культури Участь за донат від 300 грн у фонд KOLO Отут реєстрація

👍63

28 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,340 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По ходу люди ображаються, що я їх на чебуреки не покликав.

😁59🤔3

27 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC≈1,470 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дощ, чебуреки і розмови про ШІ на березі озера. Після допису про любімих абізян, себто про ШІ-агентів, мій давній знайомий, а за сумісництвом і постійний читач, запропонував зустрітися і потеревенити на цю тему. На що я з величезним задоволенням погодився. Це був дуже цікавий вечір, скажу я вам: ми вечеряли чудовими чебуреками під дощем, неспішно прогулювалися стежкою понад берегом, повільно намотуючи кола, і увесь

55🔥10👍3

24 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,560 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шини оплачено, дякую усім! Вийшло навіть трошки менше, 17356грн, тож решту поки переклав в постійну банку до наступного збору. Ще раз усім дякую, і гарних вам вихідних!

12🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,580 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Товариство, лишилось буквально трошечки добить. https://send.monobank.ua/jar/4w4LYbMRdy

11

23 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,750 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За смішний мем з вас по дві гривні на збір.

🔥23🤔5

23 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC≈1,770 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Останнім часом на роботі я дрєсірую любіму абізяну. Навіть не одну, а ціле стадо. Я розробляю набір LLM агентів під мої власні задачі, і це стало одним з найцікавіших проєктів. Тривалий час саме написання коду в рамках роботи перестало приносити задоволення, тому я зміщую свій фокус в сторону продуктового мислення та розробки рішень проблем, які переді мною стоять. Так, та сама "продуктова інженерія". Будемо відвер

71👍12

22 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,530 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Товариство, вітаю. По-перше, хочу поділитися хорошою новиною — РЕБ, на який ми з вами збирали кошти, уже місяць захищає бійців 115 ОМБр, дозволяючи їм безпечніше виконувати бойові завдання, зокрема з матеріально-технічного забезпечення підрозділів на передовій. Дякую усім, хто допоміг з цим збором! А по-друге, знову маю до вас прохання. Підрозділ з 65-ї бригади просить допомогти з придбанням позашляхових шин для пік

25🔥7

6 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC≈2,130 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доброго понеділкового ранку, товариство! Поки канал активно набирає нових відписників, приймаю ваші побажання щодо дописів на цей тиждень. Буду відвертим, особиста фантазія дещо підводить останнім часом, зокрема через несумісність погоди і моїх планів сходити повудити карасів. Тому делегую на вас контент-план ) До речі, хтось ще цими вихідними робитиме собі вікенд ментального здоровʼя на Карибах разом з Едвардом Ке

40

3 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC≈2,180 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#партнерський_допис Товариство, тут SKELAR проводить завтра конференцію Code2Lead, головними темами якої є поточні події в tech-світі та яким буде код завтра. Вони зібрали інженерів з найсильнішою експертизою у BigTech і стартапах, аби вони поділилися з вами свом досвідом та знаннями. Формат дуже цікавий — такий собі телеміст між Києвом та Варшавою. Відвідати подію можна буде як офлайн в одному з цих міст, так і дол

🔥113

1 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC≈2,180 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#про_інтернет Одного погожого ранку Джон Сміт вирушив у мандрівку усього свого життя — він почав своє паломництво до Єрусалиму. Узявши до рук патерицю та перекинувши через плече дорожню сумку, він запитавсь в алдермена: "Як мені дістатися Єрусалиму?". На що отримав відповідь: "Спочатку дійди до Некствілю та запитайся там". Джон докрокував до містечка, де його спрямували до Сімплтонського абатства, а там — до міста Б

🔥355👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @babichdev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTCAnonymous Poll463 voters

Через які теми ви слідкуєте на цим каналом?

  1. Нові відео на YouTube24%
  2. HTML & CSS48%
  3. JavaScript59%
  4. Роздуми про нелегку долю айтівця48%
  5. Софт-скіли36%
  6. Мудрі проповіді про всяку архітектуру63%
  7. Меми26%
  8. По приколу просто, зараз відпишусь16%

The shares total 320%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 207,391 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дивовижний світ веброзробки” (@babichdev), 2,938 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babichdev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.