Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

база от бабазза

@babazzak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002372327740
TypeChannel
Username@babazzak
Descriptiontis a pity she was a whore
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/babazzak

Growth

2511 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:03 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 03:4611 Aug 2026, 10:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:0325no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:4625first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.2%
avg views ÷ 25 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total551
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,290
Videos
245
Links
349

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳18100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

а вообще, Мисима — это такой апгрейд Достоевского, которому повезло жить в более удачное время и пораньше пройти метаморфозу духа, потому и финальным аккордом явился малость пафосный суицид, а не старческий извод тела

7 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026

относительно интересной я считаю скорее его личность, а точнее ее положение в культуре. всеми почитаемый, его наследие — низкого пошиба мысли, среднего пошиба провокация, высокого пошиба смерть. но заслуживает ли он массу различных почестей? подается он в среднем как последний самурай, с которым завершилась веха традиционной Японии, то есть просто Японии(ведь с духом капитализма традиции не прижиться). 35 романов, м

7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026

что же насчет последней части тетралогии, чье название и побудило меня купить книгу, то нет совершенно никаких новых мыслей на ее счет, кои не были высказаны относительно более ранних ее частей. по-идиотски подлые герои, глупые худ. образы(мой любимый — несколько раз повторившаяся креветка), отсутствие хоть какой-то релевантной мысли. и вправду происходит процесс Падения, коий связан у него с падением не только духа,

7 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

спустя приблизительно год закончилось мое путешествие в литературном мире мисимы. начиналось оно в не наилучшие времена (прошлый август был проклят, как и каждый последующий день, впрочем), но именно обстоятельства тех дней послужили причиной для скорейшего прочтения его произведений. понравились ли бы прочтенные тогда произведения в этот день — понятия не имею, но его деструктивное начало и извращенные проявления вм

🐳1

7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

читать дальше

  1. соколова11%
  2. набокова89%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026

я сейчас подумал уэльбек не смешной сообщения выше нарочиты как можно шутить об успешном инцеле который ебется потому что написал как бабы не дают вымышленному еблану. эээ ниггерские и мусульманские хуи забирают у меня малышек плак-плак что же мне делать...

4 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

мужчины би лайк я инцел не потому что скучный идиот работающий в офисе и теребящий член вместо знакомства с малышками а потому что ниггеры ниггеры ниггеры ну почему у них такой огромный хууууй...

4 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

малышка взгляни я покрасил член в черный тебе же нравятся ниггеры теперь мы сможем завести ребе что значит у них головка розовая и они не обрезаны что значит ты меня блокируешь прошу ах ебаные либералы из-за вас сыновья блядей у меня нет секса

4 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

впрочем, при прочтении Пруста откуда-то узнал, что он описывал различные растения в Болонье благодаря другу оттуда, который в письмах рассказывал о всех этих буржуазных вещах. к чему это я. уэльбек изобилует техническими сухими выкладками, иногда даже отстраненными от повествования, в общем повыебываться хотел. еще после прочтения пруста я начал говорить, что подобные описания не имеют сейчас никакого смысла. нельзя

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @babazzak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

читать дальше

  1. соколова11%
  2. набокова89%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 404,770 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“база от бабазза” (@babazzak), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babazzak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.