Channel
@babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
243subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001002456246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 243 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 244 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 247 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 246 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 247 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 247 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2017. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
دوستان عزیز سلام اول بگم بلا نسبت دوستانی که این کارا رو نمی کنن ، که هی نگین ما این کارو نمیکنیم . روی صحبت من با اون عده ایه که این کار و میکنن و تعدادشونم کم نیست ... میشه لطف کنین انقد تو مسائل خصوصی و زندگی شخصی بابک جهانبخش کنکاش نکنید . میشه بفهمین معنیه حریم خصوصی یه هنرمند یعنی چی ؟ میشه درک کنید هنرمند هم آدمه مث همه حق عادی زندگی کردن داره؟ میشه از گرفتن فیلم و عکس و یواشکی از بابک جهانبخش و انتشارش تو فضا…
Photo, posted without a caption
دوستان عزیز ضمن عرض سلام و عذر خواهی دقیقا لحظه ی آخر اداره اماکن مجوز صادر شده ی برگزاری میتینگ و باطل کرد و از اونجایی که یکی از نماینده گان هم برای جمع آوری رای از اسم بابک جهانبخش سواستفاده کرده بود اعلام کردند که تو این میتینگ امکان فعالیت حذبی وجود دارد و برگزاری میتینگ و کنسل کردن و ما اگر بخواهیم در تاریخ اعلام شده و بدون مجوز این دور همی رو برگزار کنیم امکان دارد اداره اماکن وارد دور همی شده و با اَنگ فعالیت…
شاید نمی دونی ولی🙌خیلی مُهِمه بودنت👌 که عشق غوغا میکنه لحظه ی نابِ خوندنت🎤 امشب که یک ساله1⃣میشه معجزه ی هَشتمِ تو8⃣ عاشق تر از عاشق تریم🙈از شوقِ دوست داشتن تو💞 صدای تو زیباترینِ آنِ توی ترانه هاست🎵 «حضورِ تو مسببِ نفیس ترین خاطره هاست»😍 سیصد و شصت و پنج شب و روزهِ که حالمون خوبه✌ فقط تویی👑دلیلِ هرچی عشق و احساسِ خوبه💎 بیست و یک اردیبهشت سالروز انتشار آلبوم به یاد ماندنی #حالم_خوبه مبارک❤️ #بابک_جهانبخش #سلطان_احساس…
Photo, posted without a caption
فردا عصر راس ساعت ۵ عصر اتحاد داریم برای یک سالگی آلبوم "حالم خوبه" ۱۰ دیقه مانده به ساعت ۱۷ عکس و طرح را روی همین چنل و اینستای کانون هواداران قرار میدم تا لطفا با هشتگ #bjb و تگ صفحه بابک جهانبخش روی عکس ، عکس را روی صفحه تان قرار دهید تااتحادی زیبا ایجاد شود . پیشنهاد این طرح را دوست عزیز بابکیمان آقای محمد حسین عزیز دادن قدر دان ایشان هستیم @babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans
هم اكنون هتل صفويه يزد ديدار با هواداران
ویدئوی کوتاهی از دیدار هواداران در یزد با سلطان احساس
Photo, posted without a caption
خدا رو شکر خیلی زودتر از موعد ظرفیت تکمیل شد
دیدار با هواداران... @babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans
دوستان عزیز سلام و عرض ادب خدمت شما همیشه تا جایی که حیطه اختیاراتم بوده وآگاه بودم پاسخ پیام ها و دایرکت هاتون رو دادم بی منت چون وظیفه بوده و متقابل مهر شما رو در صفحات مجازیم لمس کردم اما امروز روی سخنم با دوستانیست که همیشه از شرایط ناراضی بودن قبل از این همه هجمه ها به طرف جناب خانزاده وشرکت محترم اکسیرنوین بود که چرا هزینه بلیت ها گران شده ، حالا به هردلیلی که به ما مربوط نیست که قطعا بی دلیل هم نیست ! قبل تر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“babak_jahanbakhshfans” (@babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans), 243 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babak_jahanbakhshoriginalfans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.