Channel
@b_speculant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001604214296 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @b_speculant |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/b_speculant |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 211 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 212 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 212 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 62.2% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC 📌В пятницу цена опустилась до зоны POI (1h FVG)? закрыла его и показала сильный импульс-отскок 📍Как и ожидал, после флэта на выходных, сегодня произошел откат, на котором есть возможность брать в лонг Зона интереса - 2h OB ордерблок, снявший локальную ликвидность, в который сейчас цена возвращается Отскок ожидается от зоны ордерблока Цели - те же самые, в районе $69k
🔥2😁1
BTC 📌Ситуация - выход из боковика 📍На 4ч ТФ выше текущих есть значимые уровни - $65,600, $67,200, $69,100 - максимумы прошлых недель и 1W имбаланс соответственно. Последнюю неделю цена болталась в боковике, сейчас - прорывает его верхнюю границу, и выглядит это с заявкой на успех. 📍От вчерашнего движения остался здоровенный 1ч имбаланс, и было бы неплохо, если перед продолжением буллрана цена к нему вернулась - был…
🔥5
безостановочный ран кто успел, тот молодец😄 по моему мнению - цель 1D FVG, частичное или полное перекрытие
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2
BTC в боковом движении, как и ETH Тест ордерблока 1h, перекрытие имбаланса - картина похожая Как торговый актив BTC не рассматриваю, исключительно в качестве "не помешает ли он ETH"
🔥1
ETH Сегодня ночью на фоне локального падения цена опустилась до POI - 1h FVG и успешно перекрыла его Более того, на графике мы видим локальный слом структуры на восходящую = предпосылка к походу на $1850 (EQH - двойная вершина) Сейчас цена "упирается" в уровень $1792, если пробивает его - то есть большая вероятность, что достигнет $1850 в ближайшем времени После этого следующий уровень (FVG 1h) - в районе $1900-1950…
🔥1
Тут мы тоже почти у цели
🔥2😁1
1812 ✊🏻
👏1
Искал сегодня бензин, пол-города объездил. С*ка, даже по 100 рублей закончился😡 Люди стоят в очереди, ждут бензовоза🤯 Хоть ночью едь заправляйся🫠
😁2⚡1👀1👏1🔥1
ok lets go закреп получен цели - $1812, $1834, $1850
🔥2👍1
реакция от имбаланса получена, есть варик что я думаю в верном направлении
🔥1
ETH Глобально - мы в боковике нисходящего тренда На больших ТФ сильно рассматривать график нет желания, работаем локально, в рамках боковика 1h Локальный тренд - восходящий. Видно, что цена сняла внешнюю ликвидность, захватив последнюю вершину графика, и образовала паттерн трех движения TDP (разворотный). Также имеем локальный уровень 1755, закрепившись выше которого будет подтвержден аптренд, и цена сможет пойти …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @b_speculant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БИРЖЕВОЙ СПЕКУЛЯНТ” (@b_speculant), 211 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b_speculant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.