Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ɞ•.•Aմditi𐐫ᥰ : 𝑩u𝕓bl͟͟𝖾𝚜 ୧୨

@b1bloi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003722438326
TypeChannel
Username@b1bloi
Description𝑩u𝕓bl͟͟𝖾𝚜 |пузыри|— новая женская кавер группа под прототипом «ᴋɪɪɪᴋɪɪɪ» fᥲᥒɗ᧐ⲙ : bubzi Sereliz | ??? | ??? | | ??? | ??? | prod : @jinnieprod @yu_prod @fiasprod design : @s1rpo tt : xisolgg connection : @F5avebot start : 12.06.2026
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 14 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/b1bloi

Growth

297 August 2026 — 29 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:3129no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3029first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53911439332102978621327.7%
custom 5391080457888630125817.0%
custom 5389079260826733012714.9%
custom 5391006120594674848612.8%
custom 539092745397367736848.51%
custom 538909013997889320036.38%
custom 538873954179852312824.26%
custom 538878945361346473424.26%
custom 539103462629261528024.26%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC49 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребят, я понимаю что вы ждёте резов и я сейчас всë готовлю к ним, так что пожалуйста попрошу у вас чуточку терпения, скоро выйдут резы в профайлах

custom 53890792608267330122custom 53890901399788932002custom 53911439332102978622custom 53910346262926152801custom 53910804578886301251

19 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC58 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤫

custom 53911439332102978628custom 53910061205946748485custom 53887395417985231282custom 53887894536134647342custom 53890792608267330121custom 53909274539736773681custom 53910804578886301251

18 Jun 2026, 17:30 UTC67 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

На кого вы подали заявку?

  1. Джию25%
  2. Кия19%
  3. Лисоль19%
  4. Суи50%
  5. Кнопка серелиз19%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53890792608267330121custom 53890901399788932001custom 53909274539736773681custom 53910346262926152801custom 53911439332102978621

17 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC71 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @KISSLINEEPhoto

. ݁ ˖ 🐈‍⬛ 🎀αgυrα 🥹ρrꭷdυcer 🦴 ➿➿ . * ➿ * . ➿➿ 🐰 . * >> 🎀udition ! ! 🥹 0/1 solo . 0/1 group 🎁 0/1 port . 0/1 journ <<< 💬 >>> info <<< 🐾 bot :: [ @Kaguraprod_bot ] — true wonhee ? Yes , Kαgurα #kagura #audition #newprod

17 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC59 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @FranchescaEvryPhoto

🎀😻#p𝚛᧐𝚍ᥙᥴ𝚎r 🎀🎀🎀🎀𝙰𐌵𝙳ITI𐌏𝙽 🎀🎀🎀 ᏵR𐌏𐌵P 0/3 𐍃𐌏𑀉𐌏 0/1 🎀🎀 🎀 🎀🎀🎀J𐌏𐌵R𐌽A𑀉I𐍃T 0/2 P𐌏RT 0/2🎀 🎀🎀🎀 🎀🎀𐌏T𐋏ER 0/3 κ᧐᧘ᥙчᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ ⲙᥱᥴᴛ ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ δыᴛь уʙᥱ᧘ᥙчᥱн᧐ 😻🎀🎀 ᥲнκᥱᴛᥲ & ᥰρᥲʙᥙ᧘ᥲ ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙ 🥹🎀 '𝖢𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗍'𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖽 份愛,個家🎀🎀 🎀@FranchescaEvry 🥹 𝖥𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾

17 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC43 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Mega set under the wing of producer Dina 🪼 ⌗ . --- ୨ ! ୧ 2 solo 2 jour 1 group 1 graphic designer 1 text designer репост к себе в канал!! анкеты в коммах, резы будут в профайлах писать - @Dinkiibot look at me, look at me! 🫐

17 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @MirayProdPhoto

⠀💋➎ M𝕚ִray Pr𐐫d菜 .. ത ——⠀thׄe bᧉst pr𑄜d! 𝕚ִt’s mᧉ " 🎀 𝗔υᦔit𝕚ִoꪀ : ‧ ₊ 🏝 2 gr𐐫ups 1 j𐐫ur 1 s𐐫lо 🎀 🎀1 𐐫ther🎀 𐐼‌ׄнκᥱᴛᥲ ᥙ ᥰρ𐐼‌ׄʙᥙ᧘𐐼‌ׄ ʙ инф𐐫‌ׄ « ➿➿·➖·➿➿ » 𝖻𝗈𝗍 — @aud_miraybot. & chanel : @MirayProd .

16 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026

Все проходим!! Кто будет активничать есть шансы что вы попадете в группу

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @b1bloi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 17:30 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

На кого вы подали заявку?

  1. Джию25%
  2. Кия19%
  3. Лисоль19%
  4. Суи50%
  5. Кнопка серелиз19%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 21 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 502,205 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ɞ•.•Aմditi𐐫ᥰ : 𝑩u𝕓bl͟͟𝖾𝚜 ୧୨” (@b1bloi), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b1bloi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.