Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฐ๐‘ฉ๐‘ณ๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘บ๐‘ด๐‘ฐ๐‘จ

Channel

๐‘ฉ๐‘ฐ๐‘ฉ๐‘ณ๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘บ๐‘ด๐‘ฐ๐‘จ

@b1bliosmia

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,073subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002023853913
TypeChannel
Username@b1bliosmia
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/b1bliosmia

Growth

1,0731,0771,0759 August 2026 โ€” 1,077 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 1,076 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 1,073 subscribers9 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,072โ€“1,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:581,073-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:531,076-1
9 Aug 2026, 19:151,077first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜3332.0%
๐Ÿ‘1918.4%
โšก1413.6%
โค1413.6%
๐Ÿ”ฅ109.71%
๐Ÿ‘Ž98.74%
๐ŸŒš32.91%
๐Ÿ†’10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 16:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,150 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

โ€œBloopersโ€ (bluperlar) โ€” bu film, serial, TV-shou yoki video olish jarayonida yuz beradigan kulgili xatolar va tasodifiy sahnalar. Bu atama XX asr boshlarida AQSh radiosida paydo boโ€˜lgan. Keyinchalik Kermit Schafer uni mashhur qilib, radio va TV xatolarini yigโ€˜ib ommaga taqdim qilgan. โ€” Koโ€˜plab filmlar oxirida aktyorlarning kulgili xatolari qoโ€˜shib beriladi โ€” Maxsus โ€œgag reelโ€ yoki โ€œblooper reelโ€ videolar sifatida โ€ฆ

โค9๐Ÿ‘4โšก3๐Ÿ‘Ž2

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:32 UTC972 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Javob: Bluperlar (bloopers)

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:29 UTC954 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Freyd xatosi - inson gapiryotganda bir soโ€™zning oโ€™rniga boshqa soโ€™zni adashib aytib yuborishini anglatadigan termin boโ€™lib Ular haqidagi maqolada uchraydi. โ€œYana bitta kadr olsak boโ€™ladimi?โ€ nomli qisqa film ham Ularga bagโ€™ishlangan. D/s: ular oโ€™rnidagi inglizcha soโ€™zni ayting.

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:28 UTC911 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Javob: Leonardo Di Kaprio Izoh: Renevnant (Omon qolgan) filmida DiCaprio qahramoni sovuqdan omon qolish uchun ot jasadi ichiga yashirnishga majbur bo'lgan.

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:26 UTC881 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Bir suratda G'arbiy Berlinga o'tmoqchi bo'lgan ikki qochqin sigir terisiga yashirinib o'tyotgani tasvirlangan. Buni ko'rgan Reddit foydalanuvchisi izohlarda bu aktyor ismini tilga olgan. Kim?

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:25 UTC806 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Javob: Sikst II. Izoh: Tartini mashhur skripkachi. Papa Sikst 2 ning 6ta barmogโ€™i bor deb gumon qilingan.

๐Ÿ‘4

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:22 UTC725 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Savol matnida ikki oโ€™rinda ikki so'z boshqa ikki so'zga alishgan. Virtuoz skripkachi Juzeppe Tartinining mahoratiga shubha qilib unda uchinchi ko'z bor deb gumon qilgan. D/s: Uchinchi asrda yashagan yana kimda uchinchi ko'z bor deb gumon qilinadi.

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:21 UTC684 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Javob: qora bozor Izoh: dastlab u yerda niggalar sotilgan deyildi savolda.

๐Ÿ‘Ž6๐Ÿ˜2โšก1๐Ÿ†’1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC653 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Bir versiyaga ko'ra, X deb atalishining sababi u yerda sotilgan qullar bilan bog'liq. Qorong'uda ham faoliyat yuritgan "Ipak yo'liniโ€ ham X desak boโ€™ladi. X oโ€™rnidagi ikki soโ€™zni yozib bering.

๐Ÿ‘Ž1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:19 UTC608 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Javob: gravitatsiya Izoh: brat stakanni qoyvorsayam havoda qobketaverishiga oโ€™rganib qolgan.

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

30 Mar 2026, 16:17 UTC691 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Tom Marshburn intervyu berayotganda tasodifan qo'lidagi narsalarni bir necha marta tushirib yubordi. Tomning bu xatti-harakatlarining sababi biron bir kasallikdan emas, balki odat bo'lib qolgan. Tomning bu odatiga nima sabab bo'lganini bir lotincha so'zda ayting.

๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

28 Mar 2026, 11:52 UTC730 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

na issiqqa, na sovuqqa chidoladi bu Toshkenni elektri

๐Ÿ˜16

Signed ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’š๐’š๐’๐’›๐’‚

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @b1bliosmia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,464,234 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฐ๐‘ฉ๐‘ณ๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘บ๐‘ด๐‘ฐ๐‘จโ€ (@b1bliosmia), 1,073 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b1bliosmia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.