Channel
@b14g_network
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
452subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002015892918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @b14g_network |
| Description | Lower capital barriers to Bitcoin staking at app.b14g.xyz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/b14g_network |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 452 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 452 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
163 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 45.4% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 23.3% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 19.6% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 7.98% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.613% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2025 to 6 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Everyone sees the “45% APR” headline and thinks there’s some secret trick behind it. There isn’t. It’s just how dual-staking works on Bitcoin-aligned chains like Babylon and Core. 👉 Here’s the breakdown
❤7🔥3
Most systems break when they force users into fixed parameters. Until now, BTC stakers in co-staking marketplace had a static reward split. If conditions changed, markets didn’t adapt. We’re fixing that. Today we’re shipping dynamic reward sharing for BTC co-staking orders. BTC stakers can now update their reward ratio directly inside their order. No cancellations. No restaking. No breaking the staking flow. Thi…
👍2❤1🔥1
Most people see the 45% APYs. Few understand the engine behind them. Let’s fix that. Learn more
👍1🔥1🥰1
Babylon x b14g AMA is happening! Babylon Co-Staking just became way more accessible, and we’re going live to walk you through it. 🔹 How to unlock boosted Babylon yields, up to 80% APR. 🔹 Co-staking with just one asset 🔹 New strategies powered by Merge Marketplace 🔹 What’s next for BTCFi on Babylon 📍https://x.com/i/spaces/1lPKqvwPdgQGb/peek?s=20
👍4🔥2
BTC staker? BABY staker? Degen looking for 80% APR? INTRODUCING: Better Yield with Co-Staking. b14g Merge Marketplace is now live on Babylon. It lets you earn: 🔹 BTC APR: 1.8% 🔹 BABY APR: 80% Learn more
🔥4❤1
Service Notification: Display Issues Due to Cloudflare We are aware of widespread UI issues affecting our website and many others, caused by a current Cloudflare issue. Important: This is only a display/front-end issue. All smart contracts and user funds remain completely safe and secure. We are monitoring the situation and will provide updates here. Thank you for your patience.
❤7
dualCORE is now tradable on Glyph Exchange. What does this mean for you? 🔹Swap dualCORE back to CORE instantly—no need to wait for the 1-day redemption period. 🔹Provide liquidity and earn b14g points & G-Points. 🔹Use dualCORE/CORE arbitrage to maximize your earnings ~APY 50%. Here's how🧵https://x.com/b14g_network/status/1901607465613189134
👍20❤4👏3🔥1
你好！ Excited to join the CORE Fengchao Community AMA tomorrow! We know that our success wouldn’t be possible without the incredible support from Chinese communities. We’re honored to be part of this AMA, answering your questions in Chinese and connecting with you all. 很高兴受邀参加明天的 CORE Fengchao 社区 AMA！ 我们深知，b14g 之所以能走到今天，离不开中国社区用户的支持。因此，我们非常荣幸能参加这次 AMA，用中文解答大家的问题，并与社区互动交流。 🎁 500 points to 5 lucky winners! How to Pa…
❤12👏2
b14g 🤝Sumer Money #dualCORE is now available to be used as collateral on Sumer Money More utility. More opportunities to earn. Important Links: Sumer App - app.sumer.money/?chain=1116 dualCORE Staking - app.b14g.xyz/vaults/core https://x.com/sumermoney/status/1898419188378865709?s=46&t=D63FweYWbJ7dKTZ97UiZ8A
❤4
From 0 to 10M CORE staked. Thanks for making it happen, mah frens. 💙🧡 Bigger things ahead. Turn on notifications. You won’t want to miss this. 👀 Luv u all.
❤7🔥2👏1
b14g x Xverse Integration Maximize your BTC yield while enjoying a seamless staking experience with XVerse wallet integration. 🍻 Nearly 320 #Bitcoin already staked on our platform. With XVerse, will there be even more?
❤8👍1👏1🔥1
We’ll have a demo today on CoreDAO Discord. Check it out to learn how to participate in b14g 🍻 Join us
❤5👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @b14g_network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,043,269 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“b14g Announcement” (@b14g_network), 452 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b14g_network.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.