Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bonnan゚.*・。゚

@b0nNaN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

167subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003465536419
TypeChannel
Username@b0nNaN
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/b0nNaN

Growth

1671691686 August 2026 — 169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 169 subscribers14 August 2026 — 167 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:58167-2
8 Aug 2026, 15:16169no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:04169first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3435.4%
custom 52536279022551874652121.9%
🍓1212.5%
custom 545429888038235460888.33%
❤‍🔥77.29%
🔥77.29%
custom 531929922352133829322.08%
🎉22.08%
custom 539323437969260369811.04%
custom 539536065908706713711.04%
🥰11.04%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @b0nNaN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC119 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я их людьми ни разу не рисовала, время пришло 😼

8🎉2❤‍🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC113 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну это 🤩 продолжаю собирать все проекты с радиостатиками ✋

8❤‍🔥1🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @murdermediaZINEPhoto

Ключевые фигуранты установлены. Каждый из них — звено в цепи, ведущей к двум подозреваемым мужчинам😀😀, исчезнувшим сразу после совершения убийства. Степень их причастности к преступлению подтверждена полностью 🌟 ХУДОЖНИКИ: FunMeds тгк чукумубр тгк viksally тгк Ruslan787RX тгк/твиттер(Х) Rayhara тгк/твиттер(Х) ajyyna_8 тгк Kio тгк Сенча тгк тат, Росси фаблизз тгк Rzhkch тгк OldVideotape тгк Nemi тгк/твиттер(Х) сырник

custom 54542988803823546083custom 53192992235213382932❤‍🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC109 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот кусочки карточки и брелков для https://t.me/kartodelnya фулом выложить пока не могу 🌟 #АдскаяКартодельня_zine

9🍓4custom 52536279022551874654❤‍🔥1🥰1custom 53932343796926036981

12 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я чувствую себя мерчеделом без мерча ᯣ_ᯣ

6

12 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC70 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kartodelnyaPhoto

❤️ ➿➿ ПРЕДЗАКАЗЫ АДСКОЙ КАРТОДЕЛЬНИ ОТКРЫТЫ ➿➿❤️ Даты: 11 июля - 11 августа (включительно) Мы наконец готовы представить вам фотокарточки колоды и мерча и, конечно, возможность их приобрести \(≧▽≦)/ Форма предзаказов: https://forms.gle/XQYVj9WjoH9kbr2m8 После её заполнения обязательно (!!!) отпишитесь в лс группы ВК или в директ нашего ТГК для оплаты ⚡ Доставка осуществляется через Яндекс, самовывоз в СПБ ⚡ Мини

custom 545429888038235460853

3 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC≈1,030 views35 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой день рождения подкрался незаметно 😱, мне twenty one Это первая днюха с момента создания тгк, спасибо всем, кто всё время был здесь. Мне очень приятно, что людям интересны мои каракули, правда🤩🤩🤩 Ну по классике лучший подарок это репост работ или комментик 🙂

custom 525362790225518746517🍓8🔥6❤‍🔥3custom 53953606590870671371

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @b0nNaN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,487 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bonnan゚.*・。゚” (@b0nNaN), 167 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b0nNaN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.