Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52445639836623278016custom 53976304290438948994custom 53189086005407414362custom 53192444412134848631custom 53256767259698913871

Channel
@azerchay_fm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
128subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002043318205 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @azerchay_fm |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/azerchay_fm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 128 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 128 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
335 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5244563983662327801 | 39 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5323765667386634154 | 39 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5397630429043894899 | 39 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5325676725969891387 | 36 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5319244441213484863 | 33 | 9.85% | |
| custom 5318877659596341477 | 32 | 9.55% | |
| custom 5397585374836959572 | 31 | 9.25% | |
| custom 5319102269206051851 | 27 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5325989489783352052 | 25 | 7.46% | |
| custom 5397794522564404707 | 13 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5319258047669878556 | 12 | 3.58% | |
| custom 5318908600540741436 | 8 | 2.39% | |
| custom 5235526745406315646 | 1 | 0.299% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2024 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52445639836623278016custom 53976304290438948994custom 53189086005407414362custom 53192444412134848631custom 53256767259698913871
📢 〰️〰️🔵 Всем салам, мы ищем активных Нью в Азерб кф!!! 🇦🇿 @azerchay_fm Связь:: @mowqerr 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ #Ꭺzᴇr_ᴄhᴀy_rᴩ 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
custom 53192580476698785564custom 53976304290438948994custom 53191022692060518513custom 53189086005407414362custom 53237656673866341542custom 52355267454063156461custom 52445639836623278011custom 53192444412134848631
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53189086005407414364custom 53237656673866341544custom 53192580476698785563custom 53191022692060518512custom 53256767259698913872custom 53259894897833520522custom 52445639836623278011custom 53188776595963414771
Signed Miranda
Тоже мучаетесь вопросом что же происходило на вечеринке Дидди? 🌟Вся правда тут. Ребята, не стоит верить в этот пиздеж в тик токе про Дидди и про других Голливудских звёзд. На самом деле вечеринки проводятся в кф под названием "чайхана". И ещё один факт - настоящее имя его не Дидди, а Реана. Вот и настоящий список. Всё не поместилось, точно увидите все в "чайхане". Чтобы узнать все поближе и ясно идите в чайхану, а не…
custom 539758537483695957210custom 53256767259698913875custom 53237656673866341544custom 53259894897833520524custom 53976304290438948994custom 53188776595963414773custom 53191022692060518513custom 53192444412134848633
Signed Mírándazch.
ахуенная кф ищет ахуенных ньюшек😏
custom 53256767259698913876custom 52445639836623278014custom 53192444412134848634custom 53976304290438948993
Signed флор⁵¹⁰
( ⭐️ ) #Azᴇr_ᴄhᴀy_vidᴇᴏ by: @mirandansrl 🌟
custom 53237656673866341549custom 53192444412134848635custom 53188776595963414774custom 53976304290438948994custom 52445639836623278013custom 53191022692060518513custom 53256767259698913873custom 53259894897833520523
Signed Mírándazch.
ай бля мэйви такая ахуенная
custom 53188776595963414772custom 53237656673866341542
Signed mv 510
Кончаю с каждого эдита
custom 52445639836623278012custom 53188776595963414771custom 53191022692060518511
Signed lourens ⁵¹⁰
У нас в Чайхане самый лучший Эдитор.
custom 53237656673866341543custom 52445639836623278012custom 53191022692060518511custom 53192444412134848631
Signed Mírándazch.
( ⭐️ ) #Azᴇr_ᴄhᴀy_vidᴇᴏ by: @sebians 🌟
custom 52445639836623278013custom 53188776595963414772custom 53191022692060518512custom 53192444412134848632custom 53237656673866341542custom 53259894897833520522custom 53975853748369595722custom 53976304290438948992
Signed Mírándazch.
Я секс
custom 53256767259698913872custom 53976304290438948992custom 53188776595963414771custom 53191022692060518511custom 53192444412134848631
Signed mv 510
Джей мой муж🤩
custom 52445639836623278012custom 53976304290438948992custom 53191022692060518511custom 53237656673866341541custom 53256767259698913871
Signed флор⁵¹⁰
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @azerchay_fm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,256,081 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@azerchay_fm named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘼𝙕𝙀𝙍 𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙔” (@azerchay_fm), 128 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azerchay_fm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.