Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آذر نسرا

Channel

آذر نسرا

@az_nasra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

833subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451738123
TypeChannel
Username@az_nasra
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/az_nasra

Growth

8338358346 August 2026 — 835 subscribers6 August 2026 — 835 subscribers27 August 2026 — 833 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 21 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 833–835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:08833-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:06835no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:24835first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.73%
avg views ÷ 833 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.4
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (20 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total197
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC25 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📊 اینفوگرافی ⚠ جعل هویت و کلاهبرداری در شبکه های اجتماعی ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

5 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC31 viewsread 6 August 2026

*🚨هشدار امنیتی به خانواده‌ها درباره بازی‌های موبایلی کودکان* ‌ 🔹برخی بسترهای بازی آنلاین و موبایلی که به‌طور گسترده در میان کودکان و نوجوانان تبلیغ می‌شوند، می‌توانند به‌عنوان ابزار جمع‌آوری داده، هدایت رفتاری کاربران کم‌سن و سال و یا در معرض قرار دادن آنان با محتوای نامناسب مورد سوءاستفاده قرار گیرند. ‌ 🔹بر اساس رصدهای فنی انجام‌شده در فضای مجازی، بخشی از این بازی‌ها و تبلیغات مرتبط با آن‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های رو

2 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC47 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🟣 شایعه : واردات برنج آمریکایی با پولهای بلوکه شده ✅ پاسخ : دروغ است 🔸 هیچ پولی آزاد نشده و هیچ وارداتی از گمرک انجام نشده 🔸 آمریکایی بودن برنجها درست است اما برای بازار عراق است که به صورت کوپنی توزیع شده 🔸به علت ارزان بودن به داخل ایران قاچاق شده 🔸فضاسازی این روزها برای بی اعتماد سازی مردم ایران به تیم مذاکره کننده است ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

1 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC51 viewsread 6 August 2026

💠 مهندسی ناامیدی؛ چرا اخبار تلخ، ابزار اصلی جنگ شناختی است؟ در جنگ‌های کلاسیک، هدف دشمن تصرف زمین است؛ اما در جنگ‌های نوین، هدف، تصرف «ذهن» است و یکی از مرگبارترین ابزارهای این جنگ، چیزی نیست جز تولید «یأس». در فضای رسانه‌ای امروز، یک الگوی تکرارشونده وجود دارد؛ اخبار مربوط به چالش‌های اقتصادی، تنش‌های اجتماعی یا نقص‌های مدیریتی، با سرعتی خیره‌کننده و شدتی بی‌سابقه بازنشر می‌شوند، در حالی که پیشرفت‌های زیرساختی و مو

30 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC43 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎮معرفی بازی تونیک(Tunic) 🔻برای کودکان بالای۷ سال مناسب است. #کلیپ #معرفی_بازی #بازی #کودک ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

29 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC65 viewsread 6 August 2026

چرا دروغ‌های کارشناس شبکه اینترنشنال را باور کردیم؟ تاملی بر فاش شدن دروغ اینترنشنال ⭕شبکه اینترنشنال پیش از این مدعی شده بود، جمهوری اسلامی ایران در وقایع دی‌ماه 1404 چهل هزار نفر را کشته است. ولی اخیرا مراد ویسی کارشناس ارشد شبکه اینرنشنال اعلام کرده تعداد کشته شدگان 3 هزار نفر بوده است. اما سوال اینجاست که چرا مردم چنین دروغ بزرگی را باور کرده اند؟ 1- هیجان بالا وقتی یه اتفاق تلخ رخ میده، عقل منطق رسما تعطیل می

28 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC65 viewsread 6 August 2026

آنچه اینترنشنال از جنایت میدان علیخانی به شما نمی‌گوید ▪️جنایتکارانی که صبح امروز در اصفهان اعدام شدند چه کرده بودند؟ 🔸در حالی که رسانه‌ها و شبکه‌های وابسته به ضدانقلاب تلاش کرده‌اند از ابوالفضل سپاهی و امیرحسین صفری چهره‌ای متفاوت از واقعیت، ارائه دهند، محتویات پرونده، روایت دیگری از نقش این ۲ نفر در جنایت میدان شهید علیخانی اصفهان ارائه می‌دهد. 🔹براساس محتویات پرونده، ابوالفضل سپاهی از نخستین افرادی بود که با

27 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC63 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✍فعال رسانه‌ای آمریکایی : به همه کسانی که می‌پرسند چرا ایران ویدیوهای لگو می‌سازد… آیا نرخ باسوادی در ایالات متحده رو می‌دونید؟ ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

26 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC61 viewsread 6 August 2026

💠نیویورک‌تایمز و پروژه شناختی ایرانِ چندپاره گزارش اخیر نیویورک‌تایمز درباره سفر نخست‌وزیر عراق به تهران و ادعای انتقال پیام آمریکا به سپاه پاسداران برای برقراری آتش‌بس، اگر در کنار روایت‌های هفته‌های اخیر دیده شود، دیگر یک خبر مجزا محسوب نمی شود بلکه قطعه‌ای از یک عملیات بزرگ‌تر برای مهندسی ادراک به شمار می رود. 🔹حدود دو هفته پیش، پس از هدف قرار گرفتن نفتکش‌های متخلف در تنگه هرمز، رسانه‌های معاند از "نیروهای خودسر

25 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

چرا ریلز اعتیاد آور است؟! #تولید_اختصاصی #آلبوم ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

24 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌄 #پوستر | آموزشی سواد رسانه 🔸 آشنایی با اصطلاحات سواد رسانه و جنگ روایت‌ها ▫️ تکنیک "گیش گالوپ" #سواد_رسانه ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

23 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC63 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

معجزه‌ای ایرانی! 🔹️ فعال رسانه‌ای ایرانی‌؛ ٢۴ ساعته آب شیرین کن ایران به مدار برگشت، تونل بندرعباس باز شد، دکل بالا رفت. اصلا عادی نیست. باید در فضای مهندسی ایران باشید که لشکر آدمهای با تجربه بومی رو ببینید. این ویژگی کشوریه که خودش پل و جاده و نیروگاه میسازه، این دلیل اصرار رهبر شهید برای نانو و هسته ایه: توانایی. ┄┅═✧✺🇮🇷✺✧═┅┄ ✅ نسرا؛ محفلی برای نخبگان رسانه ای 🌐 @az_nasra

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @az_nasra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 576,304 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آذر نسرا” (@az_nasra), 833 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/az_nasra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.