Channel
@az09bw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519424383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @az09bw |
| Description | die letzten Geheimnisse |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/az09bw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 20 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 16 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
☠️ Das Jenke Experiment: Wie viel Gift ist wirklich in unserer Nahrung? 🍌 Jenke ernährt sich mehrere Wochen lang von den am stärksten belasteten Lebensmitteln. Wie verändern sich seine Blutwerte? Und wie geht es ihm dabei? 💥 FOLGE 1: GIFT in Lebensmitteln - so gefährlich sind Pestizide für unsere Körper! 💥 FOLGE 2: Die "Dirty Dozen": Diese Lebensmittel sind stark Schadstoffvergiftet! 💥 FOLGE 3: 3000 Tonnen Glypho…
Signed Johannes Kulmer
⚠️Glyphosat in Luxemburg wieder zugelassen Luxemburg hatte das Pflanzenschutzmittel als erstes EU-Land verboten und wurde daraufhin von Bayer verklagt. Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof entschied nun in zweiter Instanz, dass das Mittel wieder verwendet werden darf. Pflanzenschutzmittel mit dem Wirkstoff Glyphosat sind seit dem 30. März in Luxemburg wieder zugelassen. Das ist nach einer Pressemitteilung des Landwirtschafts…
Signed Johannes Kulmer
Klima-Card: die neue Eintrittskarte für Flüchtlinge. Wir sollen die Willkommens-Arme noch weiter ausbreiten. Ein „Wir schaffen das“ für Klima-Flüchtlinge? Der Sachverständigenrat will ein Aufenthaltsrecht für Menschen, die vom Klimawandel betroffen sind. Deutschland soll dabei eine Vorreiterrolle einnehmen. Wie immer. Von Daniel Weinmann. https://reitschuster.de/post/klima-card-die-neue-eintrittskarte-fuer-fluechtlin…
Signed Johannes Kulmer
Haben Sie die Pest angegriffen?!? Ich glaube,ja! Und die Pest schlug zurück. Wahrheit macht frei und Freiheit macht wahr 👉 https://t.me/FrMaWa Denk selbst und informiere Dich 🧩
Signed Johannes Kulmer
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @az09bw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@az09bw named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIE NEUE WELTORDNUNG” (@az09bw), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/az09bw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.