Channel
@aygul_production
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
252subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002141531323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aygul_production |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aygul_production |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 252 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 251 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 255 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 256 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
154 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 37.0% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 10.4% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 6.49% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5346192260029489215 | 4 | 2.60% | |
| custom 5348277750119538174 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.649% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда я снимала 30 рилс за 1 день, я увидела, что мои рилсы не набирают просмотры и мне пришлось пойти во-банк Я поняла, что нужно снять один залетный рилс, который подтянет другие. 25-й рилс я сняла не о себе, и не на тему моего блога, он залетел на 150 тыс просмотров, и как ожидалось, поднял активность на странице. Но аудитория (+500 человек) по итогу пришла разная, не только моя ЦА. Я сама выбрала такой вариа…
❤4🔥2💯1
Плюсы челленджа 30 рилс за 24 часа 1) Новая аудитория, подписки, + более 500 человек в блоге 2) Этот челлендж разблокировал меня, убрал некоторые мои страхи и перфекционизм. Не было времени думать над сценарием и я просто говорила) А после челленджа мой мозг понял, что можно выкладывать всё, что хочешь и мир не рухнет. Я то, конечно, это понимала и раньше, но мой мозг нет😀 3) Высвободилась энергия. Давно хотела уп…
❤4🔥2💯1custom 53461922600294892151
Я сняла 30 рилс за 24 часа! Какие минусы? - отписки (даже подружки жаловались, что в ленте только я 🤪) - физически тяжело. Нужно закладывать время не только на съемку, пересъемку и монтаж, но и на выкладку ⚠️ Легла спать в 2 часа ночи. 😪 Но плюсов гораздо больше, о них в след посте.
❤4custom 53482777501195381741
Сегодня провожу челлендж 30 рилс за 1 день! 🔥🔥🔥 Это совсем непросто, как оказалось. Но мне нравится 👍 Люблю я челленджи, готова не спать 😀 https://www.instagram.com/aygulmukhitova?igsh=MzZoMTdjeDU4cTF2
❤4😍2custom 53482777501195381741
File, posted without a caption
❤6🔥5🥰5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥6👍5
Есть идея создать комьюнити проявленных, для тех, кто ведет свой блог или хочет регулярно его вести
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Теперь нужна распаковка😀
💯4🔥3😁3
Наградой за задачи прошлой недели я ставила себе новый лук! После такой награды с энтузиазмом принимаюсь за задачи следующей недели.
🔥4❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
А вы заметили, что я стала вести телеграм регулярно? И не только телегу! В инсте +1800 подписчиков за три месяца! Еще и ВК, и Тредс, и Max, и ютуб 😀 Раньше столько себя ругала, что не веду соц. сети. Прежде бывали вспышки активности, а потом снова всё бросала. Но я нашла решение, как не бросать. 💕Я собрала сообщество девочек, которые хотят вести свой блог регулярно, мы встречаемся еженедельно, прописываем план н…
❤4👍3🔥3💯1
Сходили на футбол ⚽️ Муж и сын обожают смотреть футбол по телевизору, но ни разу не были на матче. Я всё организовала 👌 Атмосфера 🔥🔥🔥
🥰5❤4👏4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aygul_production. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть идея создать комьюнити проявленных, для тех, кто ведет свой блог или хочет регулярно его вести
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,081,034 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продюсер. Айгуль Мухитова” (@aygul_production), 252 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aygul_production.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.