4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 407–416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 08:20
408
-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:33
413
-2
26 Aug 2026, 18:45
415
no change
26 Aug 2026, 18:30
415
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
97.3%
👎
2
2.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السَلام عليكم شلونكم بنـات
اني ايــة صاحبة هَــآي القناة حالياً القناة مو يمي صديقتي سويتها مشـرفة قبل لا احذف حسابي كلت من اسوي جديد ترجع تسويني مشرفة بس ما صارت والقناة مااكدر بـ؏ــد اصير بيها مشرفة وهاي الرسالة صديقتي حتنشرها الكم
اني سويـت قناة جديدة بالضبط مثل هَــآي وراح انشر مثل النشر بيها وهاي القناة راح يتوقف النشر بيها لأن بـ؏ــد مو يمي ومااكدر انـشر
الي تحـب تنظم بالقـناة الجديدة اهلاً بيكم
وهسه راح تن…
قد يسأل سائل أنه لماذا سُمي الإمام الصادق بالصادق مع أنهم كلهم صادقين؟.
فهذا هو الجواب : وإنما هذه الاختصاصات بالألقاب ، إنما هي ألقاب احترامية خصهم بها رسول الله"ص وآله" ،أو قل خصهم بها الله سبحانه وتعالى عن طريق رسوله الذي لا ينطق عن الهوى إن هو إلا وحي يوحى لأبراز وبيان فضل كل منهم"ع" لأنه إذا كانوا بلقب واحد لا نميز بعضهم عن بعض.
°الشهيدالسيدمحمدالصدر"قدس سره".
°منبر الكوفة المعظم/الجمعة ٤٤.
السَّلامُ على الغريب المَظلوم
المدفون فِي أرضِ البقيع
جعفَر بن مُحمد الصادِق .
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ayaooq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Physiology @Physiology_videos · 71,279 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“﴿وَلِتَطْمَئِنَّ قُلُوبُكُم﴾.” (@ayaooq), 408 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayaooq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.