Channel
@axror_ai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002173510971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @axror_ai |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/axror_ai |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 44 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 46 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 49 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 48 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 49 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 49 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 23.1% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 7.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ultra realistic cinematic portrait of the SAME man, preserve exact identity, identical face, same facial structure, same eyes, same nose, same lips, same hairstyle, no face distortion young man sitting confidently on a chair in a completely dark studio, wearing elegant black suit and black turtleneck, legs crossed, hands resting naturally on chair arms single overhead spotlight directly above, strong top-down lightin…
🖕1
In Last Slide and Text attachment in the Comments below. midjourney prompt, red gradient silhouette, dark profile portrait, crimson backlight photography, thriller poster aesthetic, film grain portrait, rim light silhouette, moody red background, shadow portrait Al, noir profile shot, dark cinematic portrait, red wall photography, lo-fi portrait aesthetic, dramatic backlit portrait, single cover art Al Наш канал: …
❤🔥1👍1😡1
PROMPT A panning shot of a blurry man portrait silhouette, soft focus, film grain, against a orange gradient background, motion blur stylize 700 --ar 4:5 --profile ghy9fcl --v 7 2/2 Наш канал: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Telegram https://t.me/axror_ai
👍1🔥1🖕1
Portrait of the same man from the reference image, matching his face exactly. He sits confidently in a refined private office, photographed from a three-quarter angle. He wears a tailored charcoal gray three-piece suit with a subtle texture and a black tie. He sits in a polished mahogany armchair, one arm resting on the armrest. Warm ambient light from a desk lamp highlights his features. Наш канал: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Telegram…
👍1🔥1🖕1
Prompt: Use my face with same hairstyle to generate the image with this prompt “A stark, high-contrast, black-and-white (monochromatic) side-profile portrait of a person (gender-neutral, perhaps male or ambiguous) emerging from absolute darkness. The figure is almost entirely a silhouette, defined solely by a very intense, narrow rim light (edge lighting) that traces the outline of their head, back, and arm. Наш ка…
❤🔥1🔥1🖕1
Bugundan boshlab sizlarga SUN’IY INTELLEKT boyicha tayyor “Prompt” tashlab boraman🤝🏻👨🏻💻
Assalomu alekum
📸Hayotingizni eng gozal lahzalarini jonli vinetkamizga muhrlashingiz mumkin! Murojat uchun Tel: +998993139100 +998993461234 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 Telegram kanal: https://t.me/memoriesjonlifoto
🔥3❤1
🍲SUSHI PANDA🍱 Restaurant uchun tayyorlangan maxsus MENYU🤩🤩🤩 https://t.me/adobe_desinger/30
File, posted without a caption
👏3
File, posted without a caption
👎3👏2❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @axror_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@axror_ai named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Axror_Yuldashev Portfolio” (@axror_ai), 44 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/axror_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.