Channel
@axet_erer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
234subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001469850898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @axet_erer |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/axet_erer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 234 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 234 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (7 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 818 |
| Reactions total | 146 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
359 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91 | 25.3% | |
| custom 5328024007201537959 | 68 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5377316444914599275 | 47 | 13.1% | |
| 💘 | 32 | 8.91% | |
| custom 5210713843164001844 | 27 | 7.52% | |
| custom 5319191595935882563 | 26 | 7.24% | |
| custom 5327972892795755718 | 25 | 6.96% | |
| custom 5210720831075792647 | 19 | 5.29% | |
| custom 5192786327547971128 | 11 | 3.06% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 2.51% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.11% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @axet_erer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
птица секретарь интересно выглядит, поэтому захотелось нарисовать а еще кот нарыгал на мой скетчбук, поэтому полного листа с рисунком не будет! хорошо что это был последний лист, поэтому уже не жалко, а на место "росписи" кота вклею «ЛДПР»
❤16custom 53773164449145992752💘1custom 53191915959358825631custom 53279728927957557181
игнатик, еще одно мое детище❤️❤️❤️ #Безлюдье #ИгнатХаммальский
💘12custom 53280240072015379595custom 53773164449145992754❤1custom 52107208310757926471custom 53191915959358825631
это моя детина любите его, он классный #Безлюдье #МакарКроткий
custom 521071384316400184412❤8custom 53280240072015379595custom 52107208310757926471
своих персов рисую они балбесы #Безлюдье #МакарКроткий #ИгнатХаммальский
custom 52107208310757926477❤6custom 53773164449145992753custom 53191915959358825631
впервые скачал хоррор моды, визжу как свинья резанная типа "смешной" сдвг-монтаж ЕСЛИ ЧТО в конце обрезанные кадры с каких-то нсфв, без наготы, но предупреждаю
custom 532802400720153795911custom 53773164449145992755🔥3custom 52107208310757926471custom 53191915959358825631
шутка, которая продолжится, но не имеет смысла не нравится как вышел кениг, будто штаны где-то там на лямках держатся, но в любом случае - мужчина должен быть фоном, чтобы красить женщину я продолжу делать хуйню, на более не способен, главное не воспринимайте всерьез 😁 #callofduty #brawlstars
❤17💘9custom 52107208310757926477🔥1custom 52107138431640018441custom 53191915959358825631custom 53280240072015379591
🌟🌟🌟 С ДНЕМ РОЖДЕНИЯ МЕНЯ 😛 по моему времени уже наступило 9 июля, поэтому могу позволить выложить этот пост 🧍♂️ всем известно, что лучший подарок художнику - это минет, но можно и просто репостнуть 😁👍 #axet
custom 532802400720153795915custom 53191915959358825637❤6custom 52107138431640018441custom 53773164449145992751
я разъебу крипера в бадминтон
custom 53280240072015379598custom 53773164449145992754custom 52107208310757926472custom 53279728927957557182custom 52107138431640018441
это оооочень давний киган, которого закончил чисто из уважения к скетчбуку, ибо живет он свой последний понедельник ребятки, которые тут ради колды - еще будет контент, фд не брошен реквесты тоже рисуются, я просто все еще не разобрался с учебой, неделька осталась еще наконец-то!!!! все таки отвечаю на анонку, а то момент проебал, потом забыл всех люблю 🤩🤩 #callofduty
❤15custom 53280240072015379598custom 52107138431640018444custom 53279728927957557181custom 53773164449145992751
еще реквест
custom 537731644491459927524custom 532802400720153795910custom 51927863275479711287❤2💘2custom 52107138431640018441custom 53279728927957557181
афигеть реквест
custom 532797289279575571820💘8❤5custom 53773164449145992753custom 53280240072015379592custom 52107138431640018441custom 53191915959358825631
ну да ну не вчера а вчера это было сегодня сегодня тоже сегодня, поэтому вот процесс сегодня #brawlstars
❤15custom 531919159593588256313custom 52107138431640018446custom 53280240072015379592custom 51927863275479711281
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @axet_erer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 728,466 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“axe.t” (@axet_erer), 234 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/axet_erer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.