Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Axsy art✏️

@axelaxsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

323subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321359893
TypeChannel
Username@axelaxsy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/axelaxsy

Growth

322323322.56 August 2026 — 322 subscribers6 August 2026 — 322 subscribers13 August 2026 — 323 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 322–323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:38323+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:00322no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:25322first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8572.6%
🙏2017.1%
🥰1210.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 12:49 UTC172 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lateshiftzinePhoto

🌸🌸🌸🌸 🌸🌸🌸🌸 Last few copies of Late Shift! We only have 7 printed copies left, all in A4 format. If you still want to get your hands on our fanzine and missed out during the preorder, this is your last chance! 🥹 The A4 book costs €40 + shipping, and shipments will be sent out in the first half of June. Contact @OctomonoDM to get your copy!

25 Feb 2026, 11:24 UTC351 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖍️NFC was lovely! Specially this year✨ Hope you all had a great time too and thanks everybody for the warm compliments or trusting me for commissions, supporting my art and work means so much!!🥹🎨🩷 #NFC2026

4

21 Feb 2026, 13:53 UTC420 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Crayon #badge at NFC for @hazel_noods !🤎🧡💚

11🙏7

21 Feb 2026, 13:45 UTC613 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Portrait commission at NFC for @Karbikworks ❄️🩵💙

🙏116

20 Feb 2026, 13:29 UTC301 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Second day at NFC! Here’s some more clay I have available :) #clayfigure

7🙏1

19 Feb 2026, 14:00 UTC281 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Find me at this booth (B6) at NFC! ;) I have some new stuff and I’m very excited🩵💙

5

18 Feb 2026, 17:10 UTC257 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Calico critters also available at NFC! ❤️🧡🩵🖤 #clayfigure

10

18 Feb 2026, 09:37 UTC259 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Look at some of these clay ringholders / little plates I made for NFC! :) #clayfigure

13

18 Feb 2026, 09:33 UTC221 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

See you this week at NFC2026 Dealer’s Den!! ❄️🧣 Tabling at B6🩵 #NFC

7

14 Feb 2026, 12:25 UTC323 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Happy Valentines everyone💌🏹🩵🧡

12🙏1

25 Nov 2025, 19:01 UTC≈3,140 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏰I was also honored to work on the cover for @lateshiftzine myself! I hope you liked it as much as me❤️‍🔥 Physical and digital copies are available so dont miss the preorder! https://www.furryych.com/en/store/?filter%5B12943%5D=106405

🥰12

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @axelaxsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 98,114 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Axsy art✏️” (@axelaxsy), 323 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/axelaxsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.