Channel
@aw2025withx3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
421subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003207169789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aw2025withx3 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 4 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aw2025withx3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:26 | 421 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 422 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 423 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 423 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 94.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Vậy là 2 ngày Affiliate World 2025 đã hoàn thành hết sức năng suất và trọn vẹn. Chưa dừng lại ở đó, những gì tiếp theo sẽ là phép cộng tất cả những giá trị trong vài ngày qua. Hãy duy trì thông báo và cùng X3COM đón chờ…
❤16
Video, posted without a caption
Khu vực gian hàng sự kiện lúc này
Video, posted without a caption
❤2🥰1
Content "Rác" (Invalid) vs. Content "Ra Tiền" (Effective): Tại sao phải đầu tư chất lượng? Carmen Muley vừa vạch trần lý do nhiều shop đăng video mãi không ra đơn. Có 2 loại content bạn cần phân biệt rõ: Content "Invalid" (Vô giá trị): Vi phạm chính sách, chất lượng thấp. Đặc biệt là dạng "Huopan" (nội dung công nghiệp, sản xuất hàng loạt, không có người thật/thiếu tính người). Content "Effective" (Hiệu quả): Tuân …
❤3🔥1
Turning TikTok Views into $: How to Create Content That Sells Diễn giả là Carmen Muley (CEO, Paragon Social Commerce) – một "nữ tướng" thực chiến trong mảng Social Commerce. Thay vì nói về những con số ảo, session này đánh thẳng vào bài toán đau đầu nhất của anh em làm TikTok: Làm sao để Video không chỉ Viral mà phải "Sell" được hàng?
❤2
Một trong những nhận định sắc bén nhất của Agnė tại phiên chia sẻ: Cách người dùng tìm kiếm thông tin đã thay đổi vĩnh viễn. Từ "Search" sang "Ask" (Từ Tìm kiếm sang Hỏi đáp) Trước đây, chúng ta gõ từ khóa vào Google và tự lọc qua hàng chục đường link (SEO). Nhưng ngày nay, người dùng đã quá quen thuộc với việc "hỏi AI" (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) để nhận về một câu trả lời duy nhất, trực tiếp và tổng hợp. "SEO truy…
❤2
Những key “hack” trong nội dung ad
AW 2025 with X3 Com pinned a photo
“Chúng ta có cơ hội X3 mỗi năm thông qua việc Đa dạng hoá”
Nếu "Stress" là vấn đề, thì đâu là giải pháp? Agnė khẳng định kỷ nguyên của "Tech that calms" (Công nghệ xoa dịu) đã đến, thay thế cho các phương pháp truyền thống. Giải pháp mới: Nhanh - Hiệu quả - Không dùng thuốc Người tiêu dùng hiện đại không đủ kiên nhẫn cho thiền định lâu dài hay lo ngại tác dụng phụ của thuốc an thần. Slide của Pulsetto chỉ ra 3 USP (Lợi điểm bán hàng) vàng mà Affiliate cần nhấn mạnh: - Fast (…
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @aw2025withx3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AW 2025 with X3 Com” (@aw2025withx3), 421 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aw2025withx3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.