Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Avysscriptum

@avysscriptum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001277644243
TypeChannel
Username@avysscriptum
DescriptionУчусь программировать на html и облизываю нейросети
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/avysscriptum

Growth

812 Aug 2026, 10:02 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:33 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:0212 Aug 2026, 14:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:338no change
12 Aug 2026, 10:028first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.5%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
28.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held14 (3 November 202522 July 2026)
Views total7
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
79
Videos
5
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 14 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥610.7%
👾58.93%
🔥47.14%
👀35.36%
👨‍💻35.36%
😁35.36%
23.57%
23.57%
🏆23.57%
💅23.57%
💋23.57%
🕊23.57%
11.79%
11.79%
🍌11.79%
🍓11.79%
🍾11.79%
🎅11.79%
👌11.79%
👍11.79%
12 further kinds1221.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Mar 2026, 00:03 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У некоторых приложений есть онлайн-функции, но еще это и оффлайн мессенджеры. Они могут работать по Bluetooth. Они бесполезны на большом расстоянии, но если вы недалеко, а интернета нет вообще, то они могут пригодится. Можете посмотреть эти приложения, посоветовать их друзьям и вместе проверить, вдруг какое-то приложение реально окажется полезным для вас. Они могут пригодится если вы не далеко по учебе, в походе или

11🍌1🤔1🤝1🫡1😁1

29 Mar 2026, 00:03 UTC22 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bitchat Максимальное простое приложение с зелено-хакерским дизайном. Появилось в 2025 году. Работает по Bluetooth, можно выбирать себе имя, есть только общий чат. Регистрации нет вообще. Можно отправлять картинки и голосовые! Каналы связи: Bluetooth Официальная страница: https://bitchat.free/ Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bitchat.droid App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/bitc

👾21👌1👨‍💻1👻1🕊1

29 Mar 2026, 00:03 UTC8 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bridgefy Создан в 2014 году, самый популярный. Очень простое приложение. Онлайн регистрация с помощью Google-аккаунта, но далее оффлайн. Есть личные сообщения и сообщения всем вокруг. Только текст, копировать текст сообщений нельзя. Для работы нужен Bluetooth и геопозиция. Может потребоваться перезапустить приложение, чтобы были видны люди, иногда есть с этим проблемы. Каналы связи: Bluetooth Официальная страница

1❤‍🔥1🍓1🎅1💊1💋1💯1

29 Mar 2026, 00:03 UTC5 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Briar Разрабатывается с 2015г. Минималистичный дизайн, нужно вводить свой пароль при входе, так что сохраните его недалеко. Очень качественное приложение. Чтобы написать человеку отсканируйте QR код на его телефоне или отправьте специальную ссылку. Можно сохранять людей в контакты и знакомить эти контакты между собой, чтобы они могли общаться без верификации по QR коду вживую. Есть смайлики, можно отправлять изобр

❤‍🔥21🏆1👀1💅1🦄1

29 Mar 2026, 00:02 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет! В связи с проблемами с тг и необходимостью дальше общаться с людьми я решил изучить тему оффлайн-мессенджеров и нашел несколько приложений, которыми хочу поделиться с вами. Для их работы нужен Bluetooth и можно обмениваться сообщениями на небольшом расстоянии друг от друга, или если между вами есть люди с такими же приложениями и потому чем больше людей в толпе их имеют, тем по идее лучше они должны раб

🔥21❤‍🔥1👨‍💻1💘1🙏1

11 Feb 2026, 12:41 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strangedalleVideo

Проверял, насколько плотно Genie 3 обучен на геймплее существующих игр. Так вот — весьма плотно. Если вы играли в Человека-паука на PS, то знаете, что у него очень классно реализована механика полета на паутине, с инерцией и всеми делами. Собственно, в симуляции — просто один в один, включая ползание по стенам.

🤯1

10 Feb 2026, 00:29 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strangedalleVideo

Хроники нейро-слопа №2 😅 Взлетел формат коротких эксплейнеров, где мультяшные предметы объясняют свою пользу. Формат ок, но реализация некоторых МЯГКО говоря абсолютно проклята. 😑

🤪1

26 Jan 2026, 18:38 UTC12 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как заработать миллиард за 1 секунду

😁2🍾1👨‍💻1😱1

2 Dec 2025, 21:47 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решил с помощью нейронки попробовать сделать приложение под себя, чтобы посмотреть как нейросети справляются с таким И вот что у меня получилось 😁😁😁

🏆1👍1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @avysscriptum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,800 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Avysscriptum” (@avysscriptum), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avysscriptum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.