2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:02
10
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:55
10
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 4 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
68
Links
11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
12
48.0%
👍
3
12.0%
❤
2
8.00%
👻
2
8.00%
🥰
2
8.00%
❤🔥
1
4.00%
🐳
1
4.00%
😁
1
4.00%
🤯
1
4.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 26 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ладно, все же есть интересные элементы: кальций для костей, кислород для воздуха или вместе с водородом это уже вода. Золото какое-нибудь, медь и прочее.
Ведь можно представить такой интересный мир: маги могли бы чувствовать, где хорошая земля для растений, помогать лечить кости, очень эпично и красиво готовить еду.
Мне кажется, что у такого мира очень интересный потенциал. А еще я выяснил, что около трети всех эле…
Недавно я вновь задумался о магическом мире, где маги могли бы управлять именно химическими элементами, и я понял, что это может быть очень интересный мир.
Во всех мирах там маги огня пуляют фаерболами, колдуют всякое. Или вот в аватаре все воюют струей огня, пуляют камушки или воду. Самые крутые могут бить электричеством (и заряжать электростанции во втором сериале!), управлять растениями, кровью, металлами и так д…
Магия черного солнца — тут я рассуждаю о магии в разных мирах.
А вот мои каналы по другим темам:
● Пивная сущность — мой личный блог: мысли и закулисье проектов
● Avysmorfias — мой творческий хаб: фотография и разное
● Avysstekton — моя Sci-fi вселенная
● Avysscriptum — пишу про свое айти
● Avysslingva — про языки и лингвистику
● Мансийская тетрадь — изучаю культуру и язык своего народа
● Esperanto kodlibro — мой бл…
Интересно при современном отношении к текстам и изображениям, сделанным при помощи нейросетей смотреть как я раньше создавал небольшие статьи про магов и прочее магическое. Нравится рассматривать это как эксперимент первых работ с нейросетями.
Давно тут особо ничего не публиковал, но тут даже остались люди, а еще недавно я снова задумался о всяком магическом и подумал, что раз у меня еще есть такой канал изначально …
Нейросети - достаточно крутая штука. С их помощью, как минимум в этом проекте, я придумал множество необычных имен, также она помогла мне придумать события и некоторые описания. Нейросети не заменят полностью человек, но они очень крутой инструмент.
Далее я буду работать с проектом Avysstekton и с помощью нейросетей я планирую придумать особенности формирования некоторых стран и их названия.
Я давненько не писал статьи про магов. Интерес к этому занятию у меня немного поутих, но недавно мне захотелось написать еще одну статью, задействовав нейросетки. Привычная мне Stable Diffusion Online сейчас работает как-то странно и я нашел другую нейросеть - DreamStudio. С ней получилось даже круче: https://vk.com/@-216403638-pepelnaya-pustosh
Наконец-то я смог приступить к знакомству с Stable Diffusion. Ранее я касался лишь ее веб-версии, а сейчас я попробовал мобильную.
Я взял свои пиксельные рисунки космических столиц и пропустил их через нейронку, дав ей направление на реализм и вот что она выплюнула
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @mysterium_dark_sol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 26 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mysterium_dark_sol named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@avysscriptum named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@avysslingva named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тайна черного солнца” (@mysterium_dark_sol), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysterium_dark_sol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.