Channel
@mysterium_dark_sol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001867862904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mysterium_dark_sol |
| Description | Интересюусь магическими мирами |
| Created | 7 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mysterium_dark_sol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 10 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
25 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 48.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 26 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ладно, все же есть интересные элементы: кальций для костей, кислород для воздуха или вместе с водородом это уже вода. Золото какое-нибудь, медь и прочее. Ведь можно представить такой интересный мир: маги могли бы чувствовать, где хорошая земля для растений, помогать лечить кости, очень эпично и красиво готовить еду. Мне кажется, что у такого мира очень интересный потенциал. А еще я выяснил, что около трети всех эле…
🔥2🐳1
Недавно я вновь задумался о магическом мире, где маги могли бы управлять именно химическими элементами, и я понял, что это может быть очень интересный мир. Во всех мирах там маги огня пуляют фаерболами, колдуют всякое. Или вот в аватаре все воюют струей огня, пуляют камушки или воду. Самые крутые могут бить электричеством (и заряжать электростанции во втором сериале!), управлять растениями, кровью, металлами и так д…
👻2🤯1
Магия черного солнца — тут я рассуждаю о магии в разных мирах. А вот мои каналы по другим темам: ● Пивная сущность — мой личный блог: мысли и закулисье проектов ● Avysmorfias — мой творческий хаб: фотография и разное ● Avysstekton — моя Sci-fi вселенная ● Avysscriptum — пишу про свое айти ● Avysslingva — про языки и лингвистику ● Мансийская тетрадь — изучаю культуру и язык своего народа ● Esperanto kodlibro — мой бл…
❤🔥1🔥1
Интересно при современном отношении к текстам и изображениям, сделанным при помощи нейросетей смотреть как я раньше создавал небольшие статьи про магов и прочее магическое. Нравится рассматривать это как эксперимент первых работ с нейросетями. Давно тут особо ничего не публиковал, но тут даже остались люди, а еще недавно я снова задумался о всяком магическом и подумал, что раз у меня еще есть такой канал изначально …
🥰2😁1
Channel photo updated
Кстати, я тут недавно создал свой собственный сайт, где я собрал все свои проекты и ссылки на все аккаунты в одном месте: https://www.beeressence.ru/
🔥4
Нейросети - достаточно крутая штука. С их помощью, как минимум в этом проекте, я придумал множество необычных имен, также она помогла мне придумать события и некоторые описания. Нейросети не заменят полностью человек, но они очень крутой инструмент. Далее я буду работать с проектом Avysstekton и с помощью нейросетей я планирую придумать особенности формирования некоторых стран и их названия.
🔥2
Я давненько не писал статьи про магов. Интерес к этому занятию у меня немного поутих, но недавно мне захотелось написать еще одну статью, задействовав нейросетки. Привычная мне Stable Diffusion Online сейчас работает как-то странно и я нашел другую нейросеть - DreamStudio. С ней получилось даже круче: https://vk.com/@-216403638-pepelnaya-pustosh
Наконец-то я смог приступить к знакомству с Stable Diffusion. Ранее я касался лишь ее веб-версии, а сейчас я попробовал мобильную. Я взял свои пиксельные рисунки космических столиц и пропустил их через нейронку, дав ей направление на реализм и вот что она выплюнула
История о том как некая сущность попыталась захватить мир людей https://vk.com/@mysterium_dark_sol-decline-of-hrantir
🔥3
Что-то в последнее время мне так лень мучаться с нейросетью, что я пишу статьи сам
👍3
А какой сегодня ты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @mysterium_dark_sol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какой сегодня ты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 26 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,541,709 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тайна черного солнца” (@mysterium_dark_sol), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysterium_dark_sol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.