Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рассказы из сети ❤️‍🔥

Channel

Рассказы из сети ❤️‍🔥

@avtor_seti

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6,674subscribers

-297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002057493226
TypeChannel
Username@avtor_seti
Description🌐 Самое интересное из интернета в одном месте 💛 Трогательные истории о любви и семье 😂 Смешные случаи из жизни 😲 Рассказы, которые разлетелись по всей сети Нижний Новгород, мы уже отобрали лучшее. Осталось только читать!
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/avtor_seti

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@avtor_seti/8919 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC@mini_packaz/1118410 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC1.0024 hours
@mini_packaz/1120111 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC@avtor_seti/8955 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC1.0015 minutes
@avtor_seti/8918 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC@mini_packaz/1122412 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC1.003 days
@mini_packaz/1134117 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC@avtor_seti/9150 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC1.003 days
@avtor_seti/8896 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC@mini_packaz/1142521 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC1.0013 days
@avtor_seti/8871 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC@mini_packaz/1153626 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC1.0019 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mini_packaz6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 172 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,6746,9716,822.57 August 2026 — 6,971 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,971 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,969 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,965 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,913 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,893 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,881 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,862 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,844 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,867 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,838 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,828 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,814 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,796 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,788 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,764 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,752 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,741 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,789 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,775 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,727 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,699 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,682 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,674 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,629–7,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:346,674-8
6 Nov 2026, 10:466,682-17
3 Nov 2026, 17:106,699-28
31 Oct 2026, 14:286,727-28
28 Oct 2026, 05:516,755-20
25 Oct 2026, 01:096,775-14
22 Oct 2026, 07:176,789+48
18 Oct 2026, 17:456,741-11
16 Oct 2026, 04:286,752-12
12 Oct 2026, 23:376,764-24
6 Oct 2026, 11:576,788-8
29 Sept 2026, 02:376,796-18
19 Sept 2026, 13:206,814-14
15 Sept 2026, 06:206,828-10
11 Sept 2026, 11:406,838-29
6 Sept 2026, 16:386,867+23
2 Sept 2026, 04:336,844-18
30 Aug 2026, 06:566,862-19
27 Aug 2026, 03:156,881-10
24 Aug 2026, 06:486,891first reading

Engagement

241 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.51%
avg views ÷ 6,674 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.244%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 241 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held241 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total46,366
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,870
Videos
≈2
Links
≈4,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 73 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3332.0%
❤3130.1%
🔥2019.4%
👏98.74%
🤔54.85%
🤬21.94%
👎10.971%
😁10.971%
🥰10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 241 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 241 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 126 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC80 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

- Дианка, я тебя люблю! - крикнул какой-то парень, вытянув вверх над головой большого игрушечного медведя После той встречи на велосипедах Ваня встретился с девушкой еще пару раз, а потом она улетела в другой город - на гастроли. Ваня, конечно, переживал, он впервые поймал себя на мысли, что... Думает, как там будет Диана. К тому же он не понимал, в каких отношениях они находятся и находятся ли вообще. Ведь они об э…

14 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC97 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Лежит женщина в реанимации, уже почти умирает… Вдруг слышит голос Бога: — Даю тебе еще 10 лет жизни!!! Вскочила женщина с койки и бегом к пластическому хирургу. Сделала себе ринопластику, подтяжку лица, блефаропластику, липосакцию, в общем все! Ну думает, хоть 10 лет поживу в свое удовольствие. Только выходит из клиники, вдруг БАЦ грузовик ее переезжает. Душа женщины отлетает и вопрошает: — Господи, ну как же так? Т…

14 Nov 2026, 09:35 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

В выходные парочка арендовала велосипеды и пошла кататься. Время они провели просто замечательно! Каждый раз Ваня стирал сообщение и набирал его заново. Он очень хотел пригласить Диану куда-то, но словно... боялся чего-то. Это звучало довольно странно, но видимо он боялся отказа?.. А с другой стороны - почему? Ему и самому данный факт был совсем непонятен. Ведь он привык, что девушки гроздьями вешались ему на шею, …

👍1

14 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC166 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🥹 Она ушла… из-за меня С детства я была «не такой». Уши торчали, волосы — пакля, прыщи на лбу, а мама каждый день повторяла: «Ты моё наказание». Она могла говорить это и подругам по телефону, растягивая слова: «Если бы не этот цирк с Веркой и её отцом, я бы карьеру сделала!». Я верила, что всё правда — и что именно я испортила маме жизнь. Папа был мягкий, добрый. Но наивный. Он верил маме всегда. Даже когда она вод…

14 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

- Что ты смотришь? Это линзы! - засмеялась Диана, вытаскивая линзу из зрачка и демонстрируя свой натуральный цвет глаз Ване повезло, что вместе с ним переехали и некоторые другие члены его команды. Например, парень, который играл на барабанах и еще один человек. Как-то со знакомыми людьми он чувствовал в новом городе себя свободнее и проще. Яна тоже сделала им предложение, правда вот снимать квартиру им не стала, по…

👍1

14 Nov 2026, 05:30 UTC241 viewsread 14 November 2026

Муж моей подруги ум@р от рака. Его дети долго писали ему СМС-сообщения о том, как они поживают. Номер передали другому абоненту, и он начал отвечать. Отвечал на каждое сообщение, так как понял, что к чему . Подбадривал их, писал в ответ очень хорошие слова. Когда их мама узнала, то решила позвонить. Говорили они по телефону до утра. Встретились. Спустя почти пять лет она выходит замуж, дети его называют папа-два, он…

14 Nov 2026, 00:35 UTC344 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

- Иногда можно, - ответил Ваня, шумно выдыхая дым В "Валлете" было шумно и накурено. Хотя народу было еще не так много - основная масса людей подтягивалась после 8 вечера. Ваня со своими музыкантами оглянулся, ища столик с Яной и ее мужем. Женщина замахала ему рукой. - Ваня, садись! - сказала она. Ваня, увидев женщину, подошел за столик. - Привет, парень! - Валера пожал ему руку. Ваня присел рядом. Читать продол…

13 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC484 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Девчушка протянула ему листочек и ручку, - распишитесь, пожалуйста! Время пролетело довольно быстро. Уладив все вопросы с учёбой и все остальные дела, а также повидав родителей, Ваня улетел в Москву. Татьяна Михайловна плакала и переживала за сына, все причитая: - И как ты там будешь, мой родненький... - говорила она, гладя его по голове и прижимая к себе. - Прекрати, Тань, он уже взрослый мужик да и отдельно от н…

❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 241 posts we hold for @avtor_seti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рассказы из сети ❤️‍🔥” (@avtor_seti), 6,674 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avtor_seti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.