Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Уютный домик автора Wolk💜

@avtor_Wolk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002442104332
TypeChannel
Username@avtor_Wolk
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avtor_Wolk

Growth

1928 Aug 2026, 13:30 — 192 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 09:52 — 192 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:309 Aug 2026, 09:52
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 09:52192no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:30192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.0%
avg views ÷ 192 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,833
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53484094681765719189941.6%
custom 53460270584074156479339.1%
🔥3113.0%
😈72.94%
🤣62.52%
😘20.84%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 ФФ "Тёплые лапки" ❤️Пейринги: Юнги+Чимин Тэхен+Сокджин ❤️💀💀 ❤️Описание: Ну и что из того что он не правильный? Я его и таким люблю! 🙏Огромное спасибо всем кто дождался #волчица@avtor_Wolk #лапки@avtor_Wolk

custom 53484094681765719182custom 53460270584074156471

8 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC24 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика: автор спешит когда пишет, а гамма потом страдает 😂

🤣6

3 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC72 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mini_yoonminiVideo

Я не знаю, кто и какими способами уговорил его надеть такую футболку, но... Спасибо. Серьёзно. Спасибо!

😈7custom 53460270584074156473custom 53484094681765719182

31 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC108 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Обидно, но не по зависящим от меня причинам не успею допроверить/отбетить текст в срок челленджа... Зато завтра помимо этой работы порадую вас еще одним завершенным процессником. ❤️

custom 534602705840741564710custom 53484094681765719183

30 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC165 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Юнги 🤩🤩Тёплый голос в голове 🤩🤩 милашки Rina_Frost🤩 #волчица@avtor_Wolk

custom 534840946817657191813

30 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC138 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Тэхён 🤩🤩 Тёплый голос в голове 🤩🤩 милашки Rina_Frost 🤩 #волчица@avtor_Wolk

custom 53460270584074156478custom 53484094681765719184

30 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC114 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍍🥥🍐🍏🎂 🍅🍏🍎🥥🥕🍏 Тёплый голос в голове 💜Пейринг: Юнги/Тэхён 🔥Описание: Представьте мир, где вы слышите песни своей второй половинки. Тэхён часто напевает что-то нелепое, думая, что его соулмейт мертв. А Юнги слушает его каждый день и боится ответить.Но судьба уже готовит сценарий, в котором этим двоим больше не удастся прятаться друг от друга... 💡Работа написана для челленджа: Soulmate summer challengehttps://t.me/

custom 53484094681765719188custom 53460270584074156472

28 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC84 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Каждый день я возвращаюсь к тому, что было тогда К прошлому себе, который лишь сдавался Но в мире есть несколько истин неизменных Время мчится вперёд и нет никаких "если" "но" или "может быть" Почти забытые воспоминания возвращаются" ©BTS: Outro - Ego 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 💙💙💙💙

custom 53460270584074156479custom 53484094681765719185

26 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC103 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DiViNeee_fairyPhoto

°❀⋆.ೃ࿔wolk Закат — это способ природы сказать «до завтра» самым красивым образом. Link: https://ficbook.net/authors/397307 #интерактив

custom 53460270584074156478custom 53484094681765719186

26 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC102 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С праздником вас 🖤 🩷Один из самых масштабных праздников в моем городе. Жалко только парад кораблей отменен в этом году...

custom 534840946817657191812

25 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC96 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Комплекс "милого мальчика" был моим недугом Но я всё равно был вежливым ко всем И в этом моя проблема За моей спиной они говорили гадости, В лицо любезности Я закрыл глаза на то, Что школа превратила­сь в поле битвы" ©SUGA & RM & Jin: 학교의눈물 (School of Tears) 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗

custom 53460270584074156479custom 53484094681765719185

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avtor_Wolk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 637,975 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уютный домик автора Wolk💜” (@avtor_Wolk), 192 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avtor_Wolk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.