Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

авы от пиздатого

@avspizdatt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

255subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002676416986
TypeChannel
Username@avspizdatt
Created25 July 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avspizdatt

Growth

2552592577 Aug 2026, 19:38 — 259 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 259 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:37 — 255 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:388 Aug 2026, 17:37
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 254–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:37255-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:16259no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:38259first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 25 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546093929925393635510921.5%
custom 52738057831658623749518.7%
custom 52918679846613440358817.4%
custom 52739646368262716757414.6%
custom 52021398214258567547214.2%
custom 53035473837186344106412.6%
custom 527624374833698908440.789%
custom 527410533136495603710.197%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Mar 2026, 18:38 UTC≈27,300 views197 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩸 avspizdatt 🩸 буст|сс

custom 529186798466134403563custom 546093929925393635555custom 520213982142585675439custom 527380578316586237427custom 52739646368262716758custom 53035473837186344104custom 52741053313649560371

Signed q1ww #iloved1rww

22 Mar 2026, 16:39 UTC≈14,000 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩸 avspizdatt 🩸 буст|сс

custom 527380578316586237437custom 527396463682627167527custom 546093929925393635521custom 529186798466134403514custom 530354738371863441014custom 52021398214258567541

Signed q1ww #iloved1rww

16 Mar 2026, 06:57 UTC≈12,700 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩸 avspizdatt 🩸 буст|сс

custom 530354738371863441029custom 527396463682627167515custom 527380578316586237413custom 54609392992539363557custom 52021398214258567544custom 52918679846613440354

Signed авы от пиздатого

11 Mar 2026, 17:49 UTC≈8,410 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩸 avspizdatt 🩸 буст|сс

custom 527396463682627167524custom 546093929925393635517custom 527380578316586237413custom 53035473837186344105custom 52021398214258567544custom 52918679846613440353

Signed авы от пиздатого

7 Mar 2026, 15:35 UTC≈9,550 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩸 avspizdatt 🩸 буст|сс

custom 520213982142585675424custom 530354738371863441012custom 54609392992539363559custom 52738057831658623745custom 52762437483369890844custom 52918679846613440354

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @avspizdatt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 867,189 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“авы от пиздатого” (@avspizdatt), 255 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avspizdatt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.