2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 658–660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:57
659
no change
16 Sept 2026, 09:22
659
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 659 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
20 (11 September 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
2,246
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 49m
Average length
27m 24s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7
53.8%
👏
2
15.4%
😢
2
15.4%
🥰
2
15.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 XULOSA QILIB AYTGANDA ORZULARIMIZ AMALGA ISHMASLIGI VA 21 KUNGA ETIB BOROLMASDAN TASLIM BOʻLISHIMIZ ONG OSTIMIZDAGI DASTURLARIMIZ BIZNI BOSHQARISHI TUFAYLI SODIR BOʻLADI.
Tasavvur qiling a qancha neyronlarni fikrlarimiz va bir xil yashab oʻtgan tajribalarimiz orqali qalinlashtirganmiz.
Bu salbiy qarashlarni uzish uchun bizga ong ostidan oʻsha ildizni anglab uni zararsizlantirish orqali yangi odat va qarashlarimizn…
O‘TMISHDAGI XOTIRALAR VA NEYRON ZANJIRLARI
🔹 "Biz xotiralar quliga aylanamiz"
"Biz har kuni ertalab ko‘zimizni ochganimizda, miyamiz darhol o‘tmishdagi barcha xotira va muammolarni faollashtiradi.
Har bir muammo miyangizdagi ma’lum bir kishilar, joylar va vaqtlar bilan bog‘langan neyron zanjiridir.
Demak, siz uyg‘onishingiz bilanoq o‘tmishda fikrlay boshlaysiz. Fikrlaringiz esa his-tuyg‘ularingizni belgilaydi.
Nat…
✨ Nega ba’zilarning orzulari tez amalga oshadi, ba’zilarniki esa yillab qog‘ozda qolib ketadi?
Sehr-jodu yo‘q, barchasining ortida miyamiz va biologiyamizning aniq qonuniyatlari yotadi!
Jo Dispenza ta’kidlaganidek, miya real voqea bilan tasavvur qilingan hodisa o‘rtasidagi farqni ajrata olmaydi.
Agar orzuingiz tezroq reallikka aylanishini xohlasangiz, miyangizda unga mos yangi neyron yo‘llarini qurishingiz kerak.
…
Assalomu aleykum azizlar!
✅ Ko’pincha biz umumiy qilib maqsad qo’yamiz, shuning hisobiga ular amalga oshishi sekinlashadi. Har bir istak, orzu va maqsadlarni aniq-tiniq qilib yozib olishga va shunday orzu qilishga harakat qiling. Shunda ular tezroq amalga oshadi.
Bugungi boshlagan kuningiz mazmunli o'tsin ❤️😘
https://t.me/avroragipnolog
🧠 NIYATLAR VA MAQSADLARNI QO‘LDA YOZISH VA TASAVVUR QILISH MIYADA QANDAY O‘ZGARISHLAR YUZ BERADI?
Niyatlar va maqsadlarni qo‘lda yozish hamda ularni ko‘z oldiga keltirish shunchaki psixologik mashq emas — bu neyrobiologik jarayon.
Qo‘lga qalam olib, maqsadni qog‘ozga tushirganimizda va uni tasavvur qilganimizda miyada quyidagi o‘zgarishlar yuz beradi:
🔹 Somatic motorika va xotira ulanishi
Qo‘l bilan yozish paytida …
🧠 Katta yoshli odamda taxminan 87.000.000.000 milliard neyron mavjud. Har bir neyron esa videodagi kabi boshqa neyronlar bilan 1000 dan 5000 gacha aloqa o‘rnatishi mumkin.
Biror narsani shunchaki eslab qolding deb o‘ylaysan. Aslida esa shu paytda boshingdagi milliardlab hujayralar tarmog‘i jismonan o‘zgaradi.
Neyronlar bir-biriga ulanadi, mavjud aloqalarni mustahkamlaydi va yangilarini hosil qiladi - axborot qayta…
🎬 “Men aslida kim bo‘la olaman” (turk filmi)
Bu kino — qayta-qayta muhabbatga ishonib, qayta-qayta singan ayol hikoyasi…
Muhabbat deb ishonadi…
Bor mehrini beradi…
Lekin oxiri yana… 💔
Ko‘rar ekansiz:
— ba’zi joylarida kulasiz 😄
— ba’zi joylarida esa ichingiz achiydi…
Dam olish kuningiz maroqli oʻtsin! filmni ko‘rib, fikrlaringizni yozib qoldiring 🥹👇
❤️🔥 Reaksiya bosishni ham unutmang!
🪑 QAYSI STULGA O‘TIRARDINGIZ?
Siz tanlagan stul xarakteringiz va ichki ehtiyojlaringiz haqida nimalarnidir aytib berishi mumkin.
👑 1️⃣ OLTIN TOJLI STUL
Siz e’tiborli, katta maqsadlari bor va o‘z qadrini bilishni xohlaydigan insonsiz.
Siz uchun muvaffaqiyat va natija muhim.
💫 Ichki ehtiyojingiz — qadrlanish va o‘z salohiyatingizni ko‘rsatish.
🌸 2️⃣ GULLARDAN YASALGAN STUL
Siz nozik didli, mehr va go‘zallikni qadrlayd…
🪑 Tasavvur qiling...
Oldingizda 8 ta noodatiy stul turibdi. Siz faqat BITTASINI tanlab o‘tirishingiz mumkin! 👀
Qaysi biri sizni birinchi bo‘lib o‘ziga tortdi?
👑 1️⃣ — Oltin tojli stul
🌿 2️⃣ — Gullardan yasalgan stul
🔥 3️⃣ — Olov rangli stul
🌙 4️⃣ — Oy shaklidagi stul
🪞 5️⃣ — Oynali stul
🌊 6️⃣ — Dengiz to‘lqinli stul
🖤 7️⃣ — Qora sirli stul
🪽 8️⃣ — Qanotli oq stul
🧠 Ko‘p o‘ylamang! Birinchi tanlovingiz ichki dunyongiz…
TEST NATIJALARI👆👇
0–4 ball.
Stressdan o'zini boshqara olishning yuqori darajasi. Odam stressli vaziyatlarda o'zini bosiq tuta oladi va hissiyotlarini boshqara oladi. Bundaylar bo'layotgan hodisalarda o'zini va boshqalarni odatda aybdor qilib ko'rsatmaydilar.
5–7 ball.
Stressdan o'zini boshqara olishning o'rta darajasi. Odam stressli vaziyatlarda har doim ham o'zini to'g'ri tutolmaydi. U ba'zida o'zini boshqara ola…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avroragipnolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
7-Savol.
Atrofda shu darajada ko'p o'zgarishlar sodir bo'lyaptiki, boshim aylanib ketyapti. Hammasi bunchalik tez o'zgarmasa yaxshi bo'lar edi.
Ha38%
Yo'q62%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 15 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Гаджеты и Техника | Новости ИТ | IT NEWS @it_gadjet_news · 20,590 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 September 2026
Новости Технологий | IT Новинки @techno_novinki · 24,393 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐆𝐈𝐏𝐍𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆_𝐀𝐕𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐀” (@avroragipnolog), 659 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avroragipnolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.