Channel photo updated

Channel
آویترون
@avitron_test
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004493024453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avitron_test |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avitron_test |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 39 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 41 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 45 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 89.7%
- avg views ÷ 39 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.86%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 84.1% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
یازدهمیهای عزیز 🌱 خسته نباشید، بالاخره امتحانات نهایی هم تموم شد. امیدوارم بهخوبی پشت سر گذاشته باشید. اگر هم احساس میکنید جایی کمکاری کردید، اشکالی نداره؛ هنوز فرصت جبران دارید. از تجربههای امسالتون درس بگیرید و دوازدهم رو با قدرت شروع کنید. با آرزوی بهترینها برای کنکوریهای جدیدمون. 🫶💚 تیمAvitron 🔗 https://t.me/avitron_test
😇1
سلام بچهها 👋🌸 این چند روز درگیر بررسی نتایج نظرسنجی و برنامهریزی برای ادامه مسیر آویترون بودیم. ممنون از همراهی و انرژی خوبتون. 💙 همچنان در تلاشیم تعداد شرکتکنندههای نظرسنجی رو به ۱۰۰ نفر برسونیم تا نتایجش از نظر آماری قابل استناد باشه. 🌱 اگر دوست داشتید در این مسیر کنار ما باشید، خوشحال میشیم کانال آویترون رو به دوستاتون معرفی کنید. 🫶 تیمAvitron 🔗 https://t.me/avitron_test
❤1
📊 بررسی و تحلیل پاسخهای شما فیزیک و شیمی | حفظ کردن مطالب و فرمولها اگر احساس میکنید مطالب یا فرمولها را زود فراموش میکنید، این چند روش میتواند کمککننده باشد: ✅ ابتدا مفهوم را یاد بگیرید، سپس فرمول را بهصورت مفهومی به خاطر بسپارید. ✅ معنی، کاربرد و ارتباط پارامترهای هر فرمول را با یکدیگر درک کنید؛ فقط حفظ کردن فرمول کافی نیست. ✅ بررسی واحد کمیتها در فرمولها را تمرین کنید؛ این کار کمک میکند ارتباط بین …
❤3
📊 بررسی و تحلیل پاسخهای شما سؤال ۴ | ارتباط دادن فصلها اگر در ارتباط دادن فصلهای مختلف زیست مشکل دارید، این چند روش میتواند کمککننده باشد: ✅ بعد از مطالعه هر فصل، ارتباط آن را با سایر فصلها پیدا کنید. ✅ برای مباحث مرتبط، یک نقشه ذهنی یا نمودار ساده رسم کنید. ✅ نکات و ارتباطهای جدیدی را که یاد میگیرید، در همان نمودار یا دفترچه خود یادداشت کنید. ✅ تستهای ترکیبی بزنید و سؤالها و گزینهها را تحلیل کنید؛ ب…
❤4
📊 بررسی و تحلیل پاسخهای شما سؤال ۴ | حفظ کردن مطالب اگر احساس میکنید مطالب زیست رو زود فراموش میکنید،یادگیری فقط به دیدن درس یا تدریس خوب محدود نمیشه؛ برای ماندگاری مطالب، مرور و تمرین مستمر هم ضروریه. برای تثبیت بهتر مطالب: ✅ تست آموزشی بزنید، نه فقط تست زماندار. ✅ بعد از هر تست، پاسخها و گزینهها رو کامل تحلیل کنید. ✅ سؤالهای غلط یا نزده رو چند روز بعد دوباره حل کنید. ✅ نکات جدیدی که یاد میگیرید خلاصهنو…
❤4
سلام بچه ها 👋 خوشحال میشیم کانال ما رو با دوستانتون به اشتراک بزارید تا بتونیم با شناخت بهتر نیاز های دانش آموزها محصول بهتری طراحی کنیم. 🫶🌻 تیم Avitron https://t.me/avitron_test
❤2
دایرکت چنل منتظر انتقادها و پیشنهادهای شما هستیم 😇 تیمAvitron
❤5
سلام بچهها 👋 اگر هنوز فرصت نکردید، لطفاً در هر ۱۰ نظرسنجی شرکت کنید. 🙏 پاسخ دادن به همه آنها حدود ۱ دقیقه زمان میبره و نظر هر کدوم از شما برای شناخت بهتر نیازهای دانشآموزها و طراحی آویترون واقعاً ارزشمنده🌱💚 https://t.me/avitron_test
❤2
✅ پایان نظرسنجیها از همه کسانی که در نظرسنجیها شرکت کردند، صمیمانه سپاسگزاریم. 🌱 نظرات و بازخوردهای شما برای ما بسیار ارزشمند است و در مسیر طراحی و توسعه آویترون نقش مهمی خواهد داشت. 💎 از همراهی شما ممنونیم. 💚 تیمAvitron https://t.me/avitron_test
❤3
10. اگر چنین پلتفرمی در دسترس باشد، چقدر احتمال دارد از آن استفاده کنید؟
- قطعاً استفاده میکنم38%
- احتمالاً استفاده میکنم38%
- مطمئن نیستم15%
- احتمالاً استفاده نمیکنم4%
- اصلاً استفاده نمیکنم4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
9. مهمترین دلیلی که باعث میشود از چنین ابزاری استفاده کنید چیست؟
- فهم بهتر مطالب51%
- صرفهجویی در زمان33%
- آمادگی برای کنکور51%
- جذابتر شدن یادگیری51%
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avitron_test. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
10. اگر چنین پلتفرمی در دسترس باشد، چقدر احتمال دارد از آن استفاده کنید؟
- قطعاً استفاده میکنم38%
- احتمالاً استفاده میکنم38%
- مطمئن نیستم15%
- احتمالاً استفاده نمیکنم4%
- اصلاً استفاده نمیکنم4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
9. مهمترین دلیلی که باعث میشود از چنین ابزاری استفاده کنید چیست؟
- فهم بهتر مطالب51%
- صرفهجویی در زمان33%
- آمادگی برای کنکور51%
- جذابتر شدن یادگیری51%
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⁉️ فکر میکنید مشاهده و انجام مجازی آزمایشهای فیزیک و شیمی چقدر به درک بهتر مفاهیم و کاربرد فرمولها کمک میکند؟ ⭐ از ۱ تا ۵
- ۱9%
- ۲11%
- ۳18%
- ۴22%
- ۵⭐️40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓️ در مدرسه شما چه میزان از آزمایشهای فیزیک و شیمی بهصورت عملی اجرا میشود؟
- همه یا تقریباً همه9%
- بیشتر از نصف3%
- کمتر از نصف29%
- تقریباً هیچکدام59%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓️ اگر بتوانید مفاهیم فیزیک و شیمی را از طریق شبیهسازیهای سهبعدی و آزمایشهای تعاملی یاد بگیرید، چقدر برایتان جذاب است؟ ⭐ از ۱ تا ۵
- ۱8%
- ۲3%
- ۳12%
- ۴10%
- ۵⭐️66%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓️ بزرگترین چالش شما در یادگیری فیزیک و شیمی چیست؟
- درک مفاهیم35%
- تصور پدیدهها و فرآیندها26%
- کمبود فرصت برای مشاهده و انجام آزمایشها34%
- ارتباط دادن مباحث به یکدیگر32%
- حفظ کردن مطالب و فرمولها45%
The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,086,237 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آویترون” (@avitron_test), 39 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avitron_test.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.