𐙚 manda cornelia i don't think we've properly sat down and yapped our little hearts out yet, but somehow you've always been one of those people who make every shared space feel a bit brighter. every time our paths cross in the group, you're always so easy to interact with, so welcoming, and somehow conversations just naturally flow around you. you've got this effortlessly friendly energy that makes it feel like …

Channel
Petals of Mozaa
@aveecamours
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001565537128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aveecamours |
| Description | belongs to @alluringpetals |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aveecamours |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 4 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 415.3%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.6
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 299 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 158
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Manda💽 Mandaaa, my baby, my sweetest daughter!! You're always so kind and so sweet, and that's one of the things I love most about you. Every time I see your account, I'm reminded of how aesthetic it is. Everything is just so pretty! And your current muse? Girl... it suits you so well. It feels like it was made just for you. Also... can we talk about your Jungkook obsession for a second nakkk? You love that man so m…
𐙚 poppy wildora my love, my sistorrr, my other half. i still think it's a little ridiculous how much of myself i find in you. every time we discover another thing we both adore, another habit we somehow share, or another thought that lands exactly the same, it makes me wonder if the universe accidentally duplicated one tiny little soul and decided to let us grow in different directions. if i'm being completely h…
Poppy💽 Hiiiii, Poppy!! First of all...nama kamuuu lucu bangett lhooo It's literally the cutest! It's so unique, so pretty, and I absolutely love it. We haven't interacted before, but from what I've seen, I already like your vibe so much. And your profile picture?? HELLOOO?? It's so cool, I was lowkey staring at it for a minute. Sooo... don't you think we should be friends? I'd genuinely love to get to know you bet…
𐙚 karlo hellour! we don't really know each other yet, but from the little glimpses i've caught here and there, you give off that oddly comforting calm guy who somehow survives everyone's chaos without saying much kind of energy. whether i'm completely right or hilariously wrong... only future-us will know. you've got this quiet little vibe that's strangely intriguing. not loud, not trying too hard, just existing…
Karlo💽 Hellooo, Karlo! We haven't really met or talked before, but I have to say... I noticed something. You really love Bernadya, don't you? I mean, your channel is full of her songs, and even your manip requests are about Bernadya. I was like, "Yep... nii orang bucin bernadya bgt." Also, your muse suits you so well! It fits your whole vibe perfectlyyy. Sooo... how about we become friends after this? Then maybe nex…
𐙚 eya r. halsey you genuinely have one of those absurd little superpowers where you somehow manage to make every person around you feel seen. your heart is embarrassingly huge, and i swear if affection were a competitive sport, you'd already have seventeen shiny little trophies lined up on a shelf. you love your people so loudly, so sincerely, and somehow still have room for every new soul that wanders into your…
Eya R. Halsey💽 There she is... my pretty girl, Eyicaw<3 I've known this sweetheart for such a long time. Back then we didn't really talk much because she had a habit of disappearing :3. But look who's back the OG is finally here! I seriously love this girl so much. She's the definition of a girl's girl: always supportive, always hyping people up, and she never lets anyone cross her boundaries. We love a queen who kn…
𐙚 titi nanas sometimes i genuinely wonder how one tiny human managed to be this soft without immediately dissolving into glitter. you're my favorite hooman, my professionally licensed 911, one of the family i'll run to before my brain even remembers how to form a proper sentence. you're just... ridiculously easy to love. always so gentle, always so cheerful, always carrying the silliest little spark that somehow…
Anastasia 💽 Hiiiii, Anastasiaaa! I know we haven't talked a lot yet we mostly interact because of content, but every single interaction has been so nice. You're always so kind, cheerful, and easy to like. Also, your account is literally chef's kiss. It's so soft, aesthetic, and eye catching. Every time I see it, I'm like, "Yep, that's so Anastasia." I absolutely adore your vibe muahh 😘 Text me if you want the origin…
𐙚 kathrine mylchreest dearest kathrine!! you're genuinely one of those delightfully sunshine-infested little humans whose presence somehow sneaks confetti into ordinary conversations. your cheerfulness feels effortless, your kindness arrives without announcing itself, and your support has always been one of those quiet little things people remember long after the moment has passed. and goodness gracious, you and…
Katherine💽 HALLOWWW Katherine, my baby!! I swear you're always the one who ends up getting my content :v. And this time, you got content from both me and Chamy?? Girl, you're so lucky!! I also have to say this, I absolutely love how consistent you are with every muse you portray. You always stay true to your vibe, and it's honestly so satisfying to see. And don't even get me started on how sweet and friendly you are…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aveecamours. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 601,491 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Petals of Mozaa” (@aveecamours), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aveecamours.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.