Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AVANGERS DOOMSDAY 2026

Channel

AVANGERS DOOMSDAY 2026

@avangers_doomsday_2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

494subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526957602
TypeChannel
Username@avangers_doomsday_2026
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/avangers_doomsday_2026

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4845565208 August 2026 — 485 subscribers8 August 2026 — 484 subscribers16 August 2026 — 556 subscribers23 August 2026 — 547 subscribers29 August 2026 — 534 subscribers7 September 2026 — 534 subscribers8 September 2026 — 512 subscribers15 September 2026 — 494 subscribers4948 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 473–567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:41494-18
8 Sept 2026, 21:37512-22
7 Sept 2026, 14:22534no change
29 Aug 2026, 16:37534-13
23 Aug 2026, 16:23547-9
16 Aug 2026, 22:02556+72
8 Aug 2026, 19:23484-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:31485first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 494 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.595%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held15 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total168
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1350.0%
1246.2%
👎13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC168 views1 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Aktyor Nuh Jupe Qasoskorlar: Maxfiy Urushlar filmining aktyorlar tarkibi qo'shildi✅ Premyera 2027-Yil 17-Dekabr☑️

1

Signed Ogabek

21 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC634 views6 reactionsread 7 September 2026

https://youtu.be/X1aFkAkFASk?si=hJ9rz2Y-_t7fBwRI

6

Signed Ogabek

17 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC752 views0 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Marvel Qasoskorlar: Qiyomat Kuni filmidan oldin ko'rish kerak bo'lgan protektlarning ro'yxatini taqdim etdi✅ 🔹X-Odamlar 🔹X-Odamlar 2 🔹Kapitan Amerika: Birinchi Qasoskor 🔹Qasoskorlar 🔹Qasoskorlar: Abadiyat Jangi 🔹Qasoskorlar: Final 🔹Loki 🔹Shang-Chi 🔹O'rgimchak odam: Uyga Yo'l Yo'q 🔹Qora Pantera: Vakanda Boqiy 🔹Kapitan Amerika 4 🔹Deadpool va Rosomaxa 🔹Doktor Strenj: Aqlsiz Multiolam 🔹Momaqaldiroqlar* 🔹Fantastik To‘rtl

Signed Ogabek

16 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC751 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

O'rgimchak Odam: Yangi Kun filmining kassa yig'imlari 2 mlrd $ dan oshdi✅ Byudjet: 225 mln $☑️

Signed Ogabek

15 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC803 viewsread 7 September 2026

Sizlarga yana bitta insayd Tom Holland Oʻrgimchak odami ushbu kinoda chiqmasligi aniqroq sababi u 2027-yilgi Qasoskorlar Maxfiy Urushlar filmida asosiy rolda boʻlishi kutilmoqda va Venom koʻrinishi ham boʻlishi kutilmoqda

Signed Ogabek

15 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC791 viewsread 7 September 2026

Eski va yangi Qasoskorlar: Tor (Kris Hemsvort), Kapitan Amerika (Sem Uilson), Doktor Strenj, Doktor Dumga qarshi yangi jamoa tuzishga majbur bo‘lishadi.O‘tmishdagi afsonalar: Insaydlarga ko‘ra, Tobey Maguayrning O‘rgimchak-odami, shuningdek, Dedpul va Rosmaxa (Wolverine) ham multikoinotlar urushida muhim rol o‘ynaydi.4. Kutilayotgan kutilmagan burilishlar (Spoilerlar)Hiyonat: Tarqalgan ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra, qahramonla

Signed Ogabek

15 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC679 viewsread 7 September 2026

2. Filmning syujeti: Multikoinotlar to‘qnashuvi (Incursions)Koinotlar halokati: Rasmiy ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra, filmda uchta alohida koinot (universes) bir-biri bilan halokatli tarzda to‘qnashadi (Incursion) va mavjudlik xavf ostida qoladi.Dumning rejasi: Doktor Dum vaziyatdan foydalanib, multikoinotlarni parchalaydi va barcha olamlardan omon qolgan bo‘laklarni yig‘ib, o‘zining shaxsiy dunyosi — Battleworld (Jang maydoni

Signed Ogabek

15 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC614 viewsread 7 September 2026

Filmning jahon premyerasi 2026-yil 18-dekabrga belgilangan. Kinoda nimalar yuz berishi va tarqalgan eng ishonchli insayd xabarlar bilan tanishing: 1. Bosh yovuz qahramon: Doktor Dum (Doctor Doom)Eng katta kutilmagan voqea — aktyor Robert Dauni kichigi (Robert Downey Jr.) Marvelga qaytmoqda. Ammo u Temir odam (Iron Man) emas, balki koinotning eng daxshatli yovuz qahramoni — Viktor fon Dum (Doktor Dum) rolini ijro etad

Signed Ogabek

9 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC814 views0 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

O'rgimchak Odam: Yangi Kun filmining kassa yig'imlari 1,67 mlrd $ ga yetdi✅ Byudjet: 225 mln $☑️

Signed Ogabek

9 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC771 views5 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Boris va Latveriya Jodugarlarining Qasoskorlar: Qiyomat Kuni filmidagi ko'rinishi✅ Premyera 18-Dekabr☑️

5

Signed Ogabek

7 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,010 views5 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Deadline nashrining xabar berishicha: Kit Konnor MKOning yangi X-Odamlar filmida Siklop rolini ijro etadi✅

🔥4👎1

Signed Ogabek

7 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC825 views4 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

O'rgimchak Odam: Yangi Kun filmining kassa yig'imlari 1,15 mlrd $ ga yetdi✅ Byudjet: 225 mln $☑️

🔥4

Signed Ogabek

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @avangers_doomsday_2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AVANGERS DOOMSDAY 2026” (@avangers_doomsday_2026), 494 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avangers_doomsday_2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.