Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шепот сквозь грохот 📝

Channel

Шепот сквозь грохот 📝

@avanesian45

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

788subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002444416417
TypeChannel
Username@avanesian45
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avanesian45

Growth

787788787.56 August 2026 — 787 subscribers7 August 2026 — 787 subscribers13 August 2026 — 788 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 787–788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:25788+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:42787no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:48787first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.8%
avg views ÷ 788 subscribers
Avg views / post
322
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held12 (12 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total965
Reactions total115
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

371 reactions across 12 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11831.8%
👍7821.0%
4913.2%
💯318.36%
💔236.20%
❤‍🔥205.39%
😱92.43%
👏71.89%
🏆51.35%
🥴51.35%
🕊41.08%
😨41.08%
🤯41.08%
🤔30.809%
🎉20.539%
🤣20.539%
🆒10.27%
👌10.27%
🗿10.27%
😁10.27%
3 further kinds30.809%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC197 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Ну что ж. Верховный Суд нас сбрил. В передаче кассационной жалобы по делу о приговоре, написанном с помощью ИИ, отказано. Без лишних человеческих движений. Автоматизация. Везде автоматизация. Сходим в Конституционный Суд, че. #приговорGPT@avanesian45

💯5🥴5😨4🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC351 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Правоприменительное брожение по дебрям ИИ https://t.me/kondrat_advokat/221

👍73💯2😱2

22 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC417 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Ну что ж. Вчера Краснодарский краевой суд оставил без изменения оправдательный приговор Динского районного суда по делу 91-летнего дедушки, обвинявшегося по ч. 3 ст. 135 УК РФ. Оправдос устоял. Но этот пост прежде всего об Алексее Аванесяне @avanesian45. Защиту на предварительном следствии по этому делу вел он. Вступил в дело с самого начала, изучил обстоятельства, собрал документы, сформировал позицию, привлек спец

🔥45💔2315🕊3

5 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC480 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Эта неделя не задалась на процессуальные казусы, поэтому продолжаю лирически отступать. Верните мне мой 2019-й. Ни коронавируса, ни СВО, ни очередей за бензином. Друзья рядом. Адвокатское сообщество еще напоминало сообщество, а не список выживших, уехавших и промолчавших. Как раз в июле с @avanesian45 ездили в Москву на конференцию по защите профессиональных прав адвокатов. Обсуждали независимость адвокатуры, давле

15🔥10👍9💯3👏2❤‍🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC488 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

«Школа жизни» с выпускным через 20 лет. Сегодня оглашен приговор по #делоосекте, в котором мы Алексеем @avanesian45 представляли потерпевших. «Учитель» этой школы Олег Гармаш не работал, жил за счет последователей и пользовался их трудом. Под видом «очищения от демонов» вступал в половую связь с зависимыми от него женщинами. Две из них были несовершеннолетними. 20 лет колонии строгого режима. Теперь «учитель» прой

👍13🔥10💯5🤬1😱1

14 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC582 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Отдых отдыхом, праздники праздниками, дегустации дегустациями, матрешки матрешками. Странный кровавый медведь не в счет. А жалоба в Верховный Суд РФ по #приговорGPT подана в срок. Вместе с ходатайством о направлении запроса в Конституционный Суд РФ. Страна отдыхает, процессуальные сроки - нет. И мы тоже. Просто делали вид, что гуляем. #приговорGPT@avanesian45

9👍6🏆5🔥3

11 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC610 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Оправдательный приговор по #делообохоте обжалован. Причем, как прокурором, так и защитой. Интрига, однако. А СМИ, опубликовавшее статью, упомянутую в предыдущем посте на эту тему (@kondrat_advokat/156), так и не изменило упоминание о вступлении приговора в силу 🤷🏽‍♂️ #делообохоте@avanesian45

😱5🤯4🔥3💯1🤔1😭1🙏1

3 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC743 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Друзья, отличная новость с грустным послевкусием. Только вчера вспоминал о #делообохоте. А сегодня Юлия @captainu_lyalya прислала мне публикацию «Кавказского узла»* об оправдании дедушки судом.** Дело, которое мой друг Алексей @avanesian45 пропустил сквозь себя с присущими ему профессионализмом и эмпатией. О котором он переживал ежедневно, возмущаясь несправедливостью, перелопачивая документы и формируя тактику за

🔥22👍14❤‍🔥43🎉2👌1🕊1😱1

2 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC545 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Есть в уголовном законе одна проблема, о которой неудобно говорить. Потому что статья тяжелая. Потому что потерпевшие - дети. И потому что любое обсуждение сразу воспринимается как попытка кого-то оправдать. Но проблема от этого не исчезает. У меня сейчас параллельно идут несколько дел по ст. 132 УК РФ. Два - заслуживают внимания. Первое - то самое #делоосекте. Там «гуру», малолетние потерпевшие, которых я представл

💯14❤‍🔥5🔥5🤔2

1 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC446 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Дождались, кароч. Свежий Пленум Верховного суда о подготовке гражданских дел к судебному разбирательству официально пустил ИИ в процесс.* Пока не через парадный вход, а через пункт 42. Теперь лица, участвующие в гражданском деле, если представляют в суд сведения о фактах, полученные с использованием технологий ИИ, должны сообщать об этом суду. Сам по себе подход правильный. Суд должен понимать происхождение информац

🔥7❤‍🔥6👍5🤣21💯1🗿1😁1

29 May 2026, 14:24 UTC508 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Пятничный дайджест. Новость первая. Верховный суд впервые решил системно изучить судебные дела, связанные с искусственным интеллектом. Посмотрят все: дипфейки, чат-боты, распознавание лиц, видеоаналитику, мошенничества, обучение нейросетей на чужих произведениях, документы, созданные с помощью ИИ. И отдельно - случаи, когда судьи сами пользовались нейросетями при вынесении решений. Ну чудно же. Эту тему, как известн

👍12🔥5👏31

12 May 2026, 16:05 UTC661 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kondrat_advokatPhoto

Вести с полей. Правовых. Апелляция по #делоосироте. Напомню, опекуна осудили за присвоение денег опекаемых. Мы с @avanesian45 представляем потерпевшую. Слухи тревожные. Якобы в апелляции ожидается оправдос. Ну хоть со стороны увижу. В предвкушении пригласил с собой журналиста «Российской газеты», чтобы вместе порадоваться. Обманули. Оставили приговор без изменения. Решили журналиста не радовать. Не иначе. После зас

👍12🔥7❤‍🔥42👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @avanesian45. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,774 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шепот сквозь грохот 📝” (@avanesian45), 788 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avanesian45.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.