Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📚Авторская Комната | Дежа Наник |18+

@authorrom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739698920
TypeChannel
Username@authorrom
Description🪶Мастерская космического масштаба — пишем фантастично, читаем эстетично | 18+ 📌Здесь вы найдете: 🟤Закулисье творческого процесса 🟤Интересные факты о создании миров 🟤Общение с единомышленниками 🟤Вдохновляющие истории @NikiDina
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/authorrom

Growth

2136 Aug 2026, 13:07 — 213 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 213 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:077 Aug 2026, 03:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 212–214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:32213no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:07213first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.4%
avg views ÷ 213 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,969
Reactions total261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
951
Videos
43
Links
325

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52540072337667939228231.4%
custom 52536558066577311795922.6%
custom 52537808245657809543714.2%
custom 52697743636531018082710.3%
😁114.21%
custom 5249205507574497798103.83%
😭93.45%
🗿83.07%
custom 524940314049462371772.68%
custom 524903129511104070962.30%
👀20.766%
🤔20.766%
😍10.383%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC33 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы думали, что я люблю своих персонажей, то только посмотрите, как я над ними издеваюсь... Ну, конечно, люблю, но мне это не мешает.

🗿8custom 52494031404946237175custom 52536558066577311794😁1

5 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC48 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✍️ Я зашла в давно забытый писательский чат, и нашла там два старых варианта аннотаций «Проклятия дара». 🤍 Первый вариант пришелся на не совсем трезвую голову: После того, как Император совершает ряд чудовищных дел, Исталита убеждается, что это надо прекратить. Являясь ярым идеалистом, она присоединяется к восстанию. И берёт на себя самое сложное задание. Идти туда, не знаю куда, и найти то, не зная что. В этом ей п

😁10custom 52492055075744977984custom 52536558066577311792

4 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC91 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52536558066577311798custom 52540072337667939225custom 52537808245657809544

4 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC56 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Моя жизнь никогда не станет как прежде!

😭9custom 52697743636531018085custom 52536558066577311792custom 52537808245657809542

1 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC108 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не теряем! Поменяла аватар👆 А сегодня еще и др канала! Создала канал в далеком 2022 году 1 августа🌳 Хотя и не стабильно его вела

custom 525400723376679392212custom 52536558066577311797custom 52537808245657809541

1 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC105 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52697743636531018088custom 52536558066577311795custom 52540072337667939223

31 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC322 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 525400723376679392215custom 52537808245657809545custom 52536558066577311793custom 52697743636531018081

30 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC138 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52540072337667939228custom 52537808245657809547custom 52536558066577311795

29 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @it_is_fantasy_babyPhoto

Ах, какую бы книгу прочитать? 👩‍❤️‍👨 🌿🌿🌿🌿 Команда сообщества 🍃🍃🍃 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 ищет авторов для публикации ваших произведений! ✨И чтобы наша пламенная любовь к фэнтези не остыла, мы решили разбавить другими жанрами. Ну саааамую малость 🤏 ✨Пишете только детектив? Спортивный роман? Что-то совершенно другое? Отлично! 🌿🌿🌿🌿 Если вы: ✨ сетевой автор; ✨ ваша книга ещё в процессе, но уже выкладывается

👀2custom 52540072337667939222😍1custom 52537808245657809541

29 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC76 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Взяла писательское бинго у Бэймин. Вышло как-то так. У кого больше?)

custom 52697743636531018087custom 52540072337667939226custom 52536558066577311792

28 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC73 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Из-под пера вам выдергиваю диалог героев: — Вы сказали, что ему помогли. Кто? — Служанка. Кажется, его личная гувернантка. Она еще раз кивнула, лишь потом вспомнив, что собеседник этого не видел. Стыд разлился жаром на щеках. — Хорошо. Надо искать информацию про гувернантку, — озвучила она свои мысли, неловко заёрзав на месте, и вернула свое внимание еде. Появились первые неловкие моменты. #Проклятие_дара

custom 52540072337667939228custom 52536558066577311795

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @authorrom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 564,784 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📚Авторская Комната | Дежа Наник |18+” (@authorrom), 213 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/authorrom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.