Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Australians for Safe Technology (official)

Channel

Australians for Safe Technology (official)

@australiansforsafetechnology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432322863
TypeChannel
Username@australiansforsafetechnology
DescriptionThis channel is committed to promoting the deployment of technologies that are safe for all life on Earth.
Created11 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/australiansforsafetechnology

Growth

2286 Aug 2026, 23:05 — 228 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 228 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:057 Aug 2026, 03:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:01228no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:05228first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
315
Videos
127
Links
786

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁233.3%
🤡233.3%
116.7%
🤣116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Stop5G_Stay_Connected_but_ProtecPhoto

🌊🐚 June 8 – World Ocean Day 🐚🌊 📡 With the rise of 5G underwater and the so-called Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT), wireless technology is being introduced into marine ecosystems under the name of “Smart Oceans.” But there is nothing smart about polluting the silence of the seas. These technologies risk disrupting delicate ecosystems, affecting marine life that relies on natural electromagnetic and acoustic sig

4 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

15 May 2026, 01:17 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

15 Feb 2026, 06:51 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @disclosetvVideo

NEW - Zuckerberg and his wife expand their existing Biohub initiative with AI-powered biology to cure or prevent disease, "The next decade is going to be really exciting, and we think that some of humanity's biggest dreams are finally coming within reach." @disclosetv

🤡2

29 Dec 2025, 03:56 UTC136 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NationalResidentsAssociationVideo

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38889394/ https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2024-0017/html

29 Dec 2025, 03:56 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Stop5G_Stay_Connected_but_Protec

The journal Bioelectromagnetics presents a special issue (out of order) dedicated to assessing human exposure to 5G and 6G technologies. All contributions in this issue are open access. Table of Contents: - 5G EMF Exposure at 3.6 GHz in Greece Using Data From Frequency-Selective Monitoring Sensors - Dual Evaluation and Spatial Analysis of RF-EMF Exposure in 5G: Theoretical Extrapolations and Direct Measurements -

29 Dec 2025, 03:55 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Stop5G_Stay_Connected_but_ProtecPhoto

Exposure to 2.4 GHz electromagnetic fields emitted by Wi-Fi devices could have an indirect impact on the regulation of genes involved in Alzheimer’s disease, particularly those related to oxidative stress and cellular homeostasis. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12531076/pdf/fneur-16-1616435.pdf

29 Dec 2025, 03:54 UTC61 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMRAustralia

High fields from electric and hybrid cars Do you have an electric or hybrid car or are you thinking about getting one? Then here’s something you should know. Electric and hybrid cars can emit pulses of extremely high magnetic fields, according to new research from Germany.1 Researchers measured magnetic fields in 14 models of cars produced between 2019 and 2021.These included 11 electric cars, two hybrid cars and

22 Nov 2025, 12:59 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://reclaimthenet.org/australia-facial-recognition-network-ndlfrs-privacy-concerns

30 Oct 2025, 08:18 UTC142 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.choice.com.au/electronics-and-technology/phones/mobile-phones/articles/advocates-call-to-scrap-the-tcp-code

23 Oct 2025, 20:42 UTC115 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Useful tips from Leigh Erin Connealy in What Doctors Don't Tell You

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @australiansforsafetechnology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Australians for Safe Technology (official)” (@australiansforsafetechnology), 228 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/australiansforsafetechnology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.