Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52402027622008347371custom 54430519458770697021

Channel
@aurora_lullaby
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003619419851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aurora_lullaby |
| Description | 🤍 тут про жизнь флористки где пряжа становятся теплом, цветы настроением, а обычные дни розовой эстетикой как коментарии можете писать в сообщения каналу, я обязательно вам отвечу🤍 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 17 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aurora_lullaby |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 14 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
51 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5359325651545374547 | 14 | 27.5% | |
| custom 5454322464047778890 | 13 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5443051945877069702 | 12 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5352955643814756571 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| custom 5240202762200834737 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5818682329521984073 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5469828013245874144 | 2 | 3.92% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52402027622008347371custom 54430519458770697021
звезда от звезды разнится в славе ✨
custom 53593256515453745472custom 54430519458770697021
🍦
custom 53593256515453745472custom 54430519458770697021
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54430519458770697022custom 54543224640477788901
🤍
custom 53593256515453745475custom 54543224640477788903custom 53529556438147565712
🎀🌸🌸 я люблю флористку за: -за то что я по сути обязана быть красивой на работе - за то, как я люблю взаимодействие с цветами - за запах - за энергетику самого процесса - за внутреннее спокойствие - за то как красиво смотрится букет в упаковке - за то что я творю 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
custom 53593256515453745475custom 54543224640477788903custom 53529556438147565712custom 54698280132458741441
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 58186823295219840733custom 52402027622008347372
🌸
custom 54430519458770697024
Sticker, posted without a caption
я создала четкое портфолио наконец🍦 как вам?🍡
custom 54543224640477788904custom 54430519458770697023custom 54698280132458741441
🦌
custom 54543224640477788902
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @aurora_lullaby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 690,322 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₊‧ aurora ˚⋅” (@aurora_lullaby), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aurora_lullaby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.