Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шея Омон

@aumont_neck

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001548595727
TypeChannel
Username@aumont_neck
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aumont_neck

Growth

747574.56 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers13 August 2026 — 74 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:0474-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:1575no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:1875first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 74 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 June 20257 August 2026)
Views total25
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1642.1%
🔥1334.2%
718.4%
💩12.63%
🤮12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Такой он был, Pre-Code Hollywood Of Human Bondage (John Cromwell, 1934)

3

17 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC192 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А еще у Ламберто, кажется, есть определенный фетиш на глаза

🔥5💩1🤮1

17 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC166 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В Graveyard Disturbance нас знакомят с героями под непрекращающийся неймдропинг из их уст, явно рассчитанный на американскую аудиторию. Тут клипы AC/DC, Апокалипсис сегодня, Джон Уэйн, Вуди Аллен и даже какие-то дешевые американские бэшки. Что интересно, имена и названия звучат из уст разных персонажей и, видимо, призваны в какой-тостепени раскрыть их характеры. Это не тупые болванчики-подростки. Они начитаны, насмот

👍2🔥1

17 Jan 2026, 11:28 UTC112 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В период 87-88 гг режиссер Ламберто Бава снял для телевидения серию из 4-х фильмов, известную как Brivido Giallo Series. Увы, сами картины получились не настолько яркими и интересными, чтобы останавливаться на них подробно. Чуть ниже я накидаю пару коротких мыслей по каждой. Гораздо интереснее для меня было узнать из комментариев факт, который вроде и лежит на поверхности, но на который я как-то совсем не обращал вни

👍2

31 Dec 2025, 17:21 UTC153 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В этом году не написал ничего значимого сюда. Это не так страшно само по себе. Но если перечитать прошлый предновогодний пост, то можно увидеть как много планов было, как много идей хотелось реализовать, с каким энтузиазмом я смотрел в будущее. Ничего из этого я не сделал, увы. Но что-то удавалось писать во второй канал (спасибо каналу chacun_son_cinema), и в целом я доволен. До сих пор учусь находить баланс между ст

2

27 Oct 2025, 06:28 UTC239 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

The Glamorous Life of Sachiko Hanai (Mitsuru Meike, 2003)

2

27 Sept 2025, 14:37 UTC254 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Во времена моей юности много сидел на форуме, посвященном trance музыке, и был там персонаж с ником Dr. Acula. Для носителей языка этот каламбур, вероятно, очевиден, но меня тогда, помню, поразила эта игра слов, и я все думал, как этот парень до этого додумался?! Лишь через пару лет, встретившись с ним вживую, я узнал, что он подсмотрел это в "Клинике". С тех пор прошло уже много времени. Я забыл эту историю и его са

🔥5

22 Jun 2025, 18:55 UTC339 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#дайджест La noche de los mil gatos aka The Night of a Thousand Cats (Rene Cardona Jr., 1972, Mexico) Хьюго Штиглиц летает на вертолете, высматривает и пикапит женщин, спит с ними, убивает, а затем скармливает их частями тысячам кошек, которых держит в клетке в подвале своего готического особняка. Конечно же, ему прислуживает пугающего вида помощник, который прекрасно готовит и "специализируется на мясе" (понятно к

👍3🔥2

22 Jun 2025, 18:55 UTC233 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Начинаю вкатываться в режим постинга после длительного перерыва, связанного с участием в рубрике #альтернативная_история_кино, нехваткой времени и некоторой усталости от кино. Небольшой дайджест всякого разного, давно просмотренного и ждущего, чтобы остаться в истории канала #дайджест

👍6

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @aumont_neck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,034,379 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шея Омон” (@aumont_neck), 74 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aumont_neck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.