Channel
@aufbruch1996
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
483subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001456979247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aufbruch1996 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aufbruch1996 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 483 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 482 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 482 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 599 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
32 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 40.6% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇩🇪 Hier eine Hörprobe von befreundeten Bands. Die CD wird am Donnerstag bei One-Eight erscheinen 🇪🇸 Aquí tienen una muestra de audio de bandas amigas. El CD saldrá a la venta el jueves al sello One-Eight. 🇮🇹 Ecco un assaggio musicale di alcune band amiche. Il CD uscirà giovedì per la One-Eight.
❤1
+++ Behörden-Willkür in Thüringen: Familie wegen legaler Musik kriminalisiert und Kleinkinder entzogen +++ Was wie ein schlechter Film klingt, ist für eine Familie aus der Glockenstadt Apolda bittere, existenzvernichtende Realität. Weil die Eltern im eigenen Haushalt Musik des patriotischen Musikprojekts „Der Michel“ hörten, setzten die lokalen Behörden (Ordnungsamt und Jugendamt Weimarer Land) eine beispiellose Sch…
Und nochmal Aufbruch. Als dieses Album damals rauskam, ist es in der damaligen Sturm und Drang Zeit voll an mir vorbeigegangen. Doch vor einiger Zeit gab es dann glücklicherweise eine Nachpressung des Albums, dass musikalisch voll in den 90ern liegt und einen krassen Gegensatz zum neueren Album "Im Nebel der Zeit" bildet. Die Steigerung und Entwicklung einer Gruppe in über 20 Jahren, kann man sich mit beiden Alben …
❤3🔥1
Bei Aufbruch ist es eigentlich egal, ob man sich nun die ganz alten, oder die neuen Veröffentlichungen anhört. Die Klänge vom damals spiegelten bestens den typischen Sound der 90er Jahre wieder, während "Im Nebel der Zeit" von der Qualität her weit nach vorne geschossen ist. Es ist auch zugleich eine sehr unterschätzte Gruppe - das war damals so und so ist es auch noch heute. Musik und Texte die nicht langweilig werd…
🔥1
File, posted without a caption
✅ Neue Sendung am Start. Unser Manuellsen ist wieder wach, Uschi's Inventur ist beendet und meine Wenigkeit ist vom Unfall wieder genesen. Also ran ans Werk. Zum Inhalt: + Der AfD Parteitag und das Maulheldentum der Antifa. + Das AfD Verbotsverfahren. Alles nur heiße Luft? + CD-Besprechung der neuen Fürstenbund. + Die Vinyl-Ecke: Störkraft, Siegeszug und Lunikoff. + Landtagswahl im September. Um was wetten wir…
👍2❤1
Guten Morgen
❤1
Denkt bei diesen Temperaturen auch an die Tiere in eurer Umgebung. 🦔 🦅 🐈⬛ 🐕
❤5
Mai-Sendung - Teil 2 Frauen trinken Sprudel... Jingle, Einleitung, Korrekturen und Ergänzungen RE LP 10:35 Sturm 18 - Ein Mensch wie du | 2008 Frontfeuer - Unbeugsam (20 Jahre) | 2026 Disturbed Mother Fucker - From times gone by | 2026 Neuheiten ● Hulduvolk - Hulduvolk 13:28 ● Oidoxie - Gesichert rechtsextrem 31:20 ● Ingo24 - Von der Straße in die Fresse 50:21 ● Stahlkappenglanz - Zieh die Stiefel endlich an 1:11:…
👏1
Wieder so ein „bedauerlicher Einzelfall“. Wieder in Frankreich. Wieder würde ich mich bei der offenen Benennung der Täter wahrscheinlich der Volksverhetzung schuldig machen. Bald auch in deiner Stadt! Wappnet euch. Treibt Sport. Bildet Banden. Seid vorbereitet. Wehrt euch.
#Kurztipp Datenschutz Man sollte Passwörter nicht von einer KI erstellen lassen. Von einer KI erstellte Passwörter wirken zwar manchmal komplex, beinhalten jedoch wiederholbare Muster, vorhersehbare Strategien oder sogar schwer erkennbar schwache Zusammensetzungen. Zudem können KI-generierte Passwörter in seltenen Fällen Ähnlichkeiten zu bereits bekannten oder häufig verwendeten Varianten aufweisen, was das Risiko …
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aufbruch1996. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 550,609 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aufbruch (Offiziell)” (@aufbruch1996), 483 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aufbruch1996.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.